Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Reducing antimicrobial usage in pig production without jeopardizing production parameters

Merel Postma UGent, Wannes Vanderhaeghen, Steven Sarrazin UGent, Dominiek Maes UGent and Jeroen Dewulf UGent (2017) ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH. 64(1). p.63-74
abstract
Antimicrobial usage (AMU) has been described to be high in pig production. Although farmers are aware of the high usage, little is known about intervention to improve the situation. This study evaluated the extent to which AMU could be reduced in pig production by the optimization of herd management, biosecurity status, vaccination strategy, anthelmintic therapy and advice on prudent AMU. Furthermore, the effects of these interventions on the herd production results were explored. This intervention study was conducted on 61 Flemish pig herds and included three visits per herd. During the initial visit, information was gathered on herd management, biosecurity status (quantified by means of the Biocheck.UGent risk-based scoring system), vaccination strategy, anthelmintic therapy and AMU. This info was then translated into a herd-specific action plan which was discussed with the farmer and herd veterinarian/other advisors during the second visit. In the final herd visit (+/- 8months later), comparable data were obtained to evaluate the progress. Overall, a significant improvement of 2.4 points external and 7 points internal biosecurity on the herds was obtained, combined with additional vaccination, anthelmintic therapy and prudent AMU. This was accompanied by a significant reduction in the AMU with a decrease of 52% for the pigs from birth till slaughter and 32% for breeding animals, based on treatment incidences (TIs) and included an important reduction in the use of critically important antimicrobials. More importantly, the increased biosecurity levels and decreased AMU were combined with significantly improved technical results such as the number of weaned piglets per sow per year (+1.1), daily weight gain (+5.9g/day) and mortality in the finisher period (-0.6%). Guided interventions as a team effort of farmer and herd veterinarian/other advisors have shown to be a promising method in the reduction of AMU in pig production.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
Antimicrobial reduction, pig production, biosecurity, vaccination, herd optimization, team effort, FOOD ANIMALS, BIOSECURITY, HERDS, MANAGEMENT, RESISTANCE, FARMERS, PERCEPTIONS, PERSPECTIVE, SWEDISH, BELGIUM
journal title
ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Zoonoses Public Health
volume
64
issue
1
pages
63 - 74
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000394425300007
ISSN
1863-1959
DOI
10.1111/zph.12283
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
8507095
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8507095
date created
2017-02-02 13:53:17
date last changed
2018-03-08 10:39:19
@article{8507095,
  abstract     = {Antimicrobial usage (AMU) has been described to be high in pig production. Although farmers are aware of the high usage, little is known about intervention to improve the situation. This study evaluated the extent to which AMU could be reduced in pig production by the optimization of herd management, biosecurity status, vaccination strategy, anthelmintic therapy and advice on prudent AMU. Furthermore, the effects of these interventions on the herd production results were explored. This intervention study was conducted on 61 Flemish pig herds and included three visits per herd. During the initial visit, information was gathered on herd management, biosecurity status (quantified by means of the Biocheck.UGent risk-based scoring system), vaccination strategy, anthelmintic therapy and AMU. This info was then translated into a herd-specific action plan which was discussed with the farmer and herd veterinarian/other advisors during the second visit. In the final herd visit (+/- 8months later), comparable data were obtained to evaluate the progress. Overall, a significant improvement of 2.4 points external and 7 points internal biosecurity on the herds was obtained, combined with additional vaccination, anthelmintic therapy and prudent AMU. This was accompanied by a significant reduction in the AMU with a decrease of 52\% for the pigs from birth till slaughter and 32\% for breeding animals, based on treatment incidences (TIs) and included an important reduction in the use of critically important antimicrobials. More importantly, the increased biosecurity levels and decreased AMU were combined with significantly improved technical results such as the number of weaned piglets per sow per year (+1.1), daily weight gain (+5.9g/day) and mortality in the finisher period (-0.6\%). Guided interventions as a team effort of farmer and herd veterinarian/other advisors have shown to be a promising method in the reduction of AMU in pig production.},
  author       = {Postma, Merel and Vanderhaeghen, Wannes and Sarrazin, Steven and Maes, Dominiek and Dewulf, Jeroen},
  issn         = {1863-1959},
  journal      = {ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH},
  keyword      = {Antimicrobial reduction,pig production,biosecurity,vaccination,herd optimization,team effort,FOOD ANIMALS,BIOSECURITY,HERDS,MANAGEMENT,RESISTANCE,FARMERS,PERCEPTIONS,PERSPECTIVE,SWEDISH,BELGIUM},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {63--74},
  title        = {Reducing antimicrobial usage in pig production without jeopardizing production parameters},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zph.12283},
  volume       = {64},
  year         = {2017},
}

Chicago
Postma, Merel, Wannes Vanderhaeghen, Steven Sarrazin, Dominiek Maes, and Jeroen Dewulf. 2017. “Reducing Antimicrobial Usage in Pig Production Without Jeopardizing Production Parameters.” Zoonoses and Public Health 64 (1): 63–74.
APA
Postma, Merel, Vanderhaeghen, W., Sarrazin, S., Maes, D., & Dewulf, J. (2017). Reducing antimicrobial usage in pig production without jeopardizing production parameters. ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 64(1), 63–74.
Vancouver
1.
Postma M, Vanderhaeghen W, Sarrazin S, Maes D, Dewulf J. Reducing antimicrobial usage in pig production without jeopardizing production parameters. ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH. 2017;64(1):63–74.
MLA
Postma, Merel, Wannes Vanderhaeghen, Steven Sarrazin, et al. “Reducing Antimicrobial Usage in Pig Production Without Jeopardizing Production Parameters.” ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH 64.1 (2017): 63–74. Print.