Advanced search
1 file | 15.08 MB Add to list

The diachronic development of zero complementation : a multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe

Author
Organization
Abstract
This corpus-based study examines the diachronic development of the that/zero alternation with three verbs of cognition, viz. think, believe, and suppose by means of a stepwise logistic regression analysis. The data comprised a total of (n = 9,720) think, (n = 4,767) believe, and (n = 4,083) suppose tokens from both spoken and written corpora from 1560 to 2012. We test the effect of 11 structural features that have been claimed to predict the presence of the zero complementizer form. Taking our cue from previous research suggesting that there has been a diachronic increase in zero use and applying a rigorous quantitative method to a large set of diachronic data, we examine (i) whether there is indeed a diachronic trend toward more zero use, (ii) whether the conditioning factors proposed in the literature indeed predict the zero form, (iii) to what extent these factors interact, and (iv) whether the predictive power of the conditioning factors becomes stronger or weaker over time. The analysis shows that, contrary to the aforementioned belief that the zero form has been on the increase, there is in fact a steady decrease in zero use. The extent of this decrease is not the same for all verbs. Also, the analysis of interactions with verb type indicates differences between verbs in terms of the predictive power of the conditioning factors. Additional significant interactions emerged, notably with verb, mode (i.e., spoken or written data), and period. The interactions with period show that certain factors that are good predictors of the zero form overall lose predictive power over time.
Keywords
zero complementation, that/zero alternation, multifactorial analysis, logistic regression, verbs of cognition, I-THINK, ENGLISH, CLAUSE, CORPUS, USAGE

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 15.08 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Shank, Christopher, et al. “The Diachronic Development of Zero Complementation : A Multifactorial Analysis of the That/Zero Alternation with Think, Suppose, and Believe.” CORPUS LINGUISTICS AND LINGUISTIC THEORY, vol. 12, no. 1, 2016, pp. 31–72, doi:10.1515/cllt-2015-0074.
APA
Shank, C., Van Bogaert, J., & Plevoets, K. (2016). The diachronic development of zero complementation : a multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe. CORPUS LINGUISTICS AND LINGUISTIC THEORY, 12(1), 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2015-0074
Chicago author-date
Shank, Christopher, Julie Van Bogaert, and Koen Plevoets. 2016. “The Diachronic Development of Zero Complementation : A Multifactorial Analysis of the That/Zero Alternation with Think, Suppose, and Believe.” CORPUS LINGUISTICS AND LINGUISTIC THEORY 12 (1): 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2015-0074.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Shank, Christopher, Julie Van Bogaert, and Koen Plevoets. 2016. “The Diachronic Development of Zero Complementation : A Multifactorial Analysis of the That/Zero Alternation with Think, Suppose, and Believe.” CORPUS LINGUISTICS AND LINGUISTIC THEORY 12 (1): 31–72. doi:10.1515/cllt-2015-0074.
Vancouver
1.
Shank C, Van Bogaert J, Plevoets K. The diachronic development of zero complementation : a multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe. CORPUS LINGUISTICS AND LINGUISTIC THEORY. 2016;12(1):31–72.
IEEE
[1]
C. Shank, J. Van Bogaert, and K. Plevoets, “The diachronic development of zero complementation : a multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe,” CORPUS LINGUISTICS AND LINGUISTIC THEORY, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 31–72, 2016.
@article{8504074,
  abstract     = {{This corpus-based study examines the diachronic development of the that/zero alternation with three verbs of cognition, viz. think, believe, and suppose by means of a stepwise logistic regression analysis. The data comprised a total of (n = 9,720) think, (n = 4,767) believe, and (n = 4,083) suppose tokens from both spoken and written corpora from 1560 to 2012. We test the effect of 11 structural features that have been claimed to predict the presence of the zero complementizer form. Taking our cue from previous research suggesting that there has been a diachronic increase in zero use and applying a rigorous quantitative method to a large set of diachronic data, we examine (i) whether there is indeed a diachronic trend toward more zero use, (ii) whether the conditioning factors proposed in the literature indeed predict the zero form, (iii) to what extent these factors interact, and (iv) whether the predictive power of the conditioning factors becomes stronger or weaker over time. The analysis shows that, contrary to the aforementioned belief that the zero form has been on the increase, there is in fact a steady decrease in zero use. The extent of this decrease is not the same for all verbs. Also, the analysis of interactions with verb type indicates differences between verbs in terms of the predictive power of the conditioning factors. Additional significant interactions emerged, notably with verb, mode (i.e., spoken or written data), and period. The interactions with period show that certain factors that are good predictors of the zero form overall lose predictive power over time.}},
  author       = {{Shank, Christopher and Van Bogaert, Julie and Plevoets, Koen}},
  issn         = {{1613-7027}},
  journal      = {{CORPUS LINGUISTICS AND LINGUISTIC THEORY}},
  keywords     = {{zero complementation,that/zero alternation,multifactorial analysis,logistic regression,verbs of cognition,I-THINK,ENGLISH,CLAUSE,CORPUS,USAGE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{31--72}},
  title        = {{The diachronic development of zero complementation : a multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2015-0074}},
  volume       = {{12}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: