Advanced search
1 file | 315.39 KB Add to list

Conceptualizations of fair play : a factorial survey study of moral judgments by badminton players

Els De Waegeneer (UGent) and Annick Willem (UGent)
(2016) ETHICS & BEHAVIOR. 26(4). p.312-329
Author
Organization
Abstract
There is much discussion in sports on whether certain behavior should be considered Fair Play. This moral judgment on Fair Play is influenced by the conceptualization of the term Fair Play as either "respect for the rules" or "respect for the spirit of the game," as well as by other determinants. To uncover the moral judgment of athletes and which conceptualization of Fair Play dominates in practice, a factorial survey approach is used. The act and the level of the match played a role in the judgment, as well as the gender of the athlete. Our results showed that both conceptualizations "respect for the rules" and "respect for the spirit of the game" were important in this judgment, with the spirit conceptualization being more dominant.
Keywords
ethical decision making, sport ethics, vignette, LEGITIMACY, SOCCER, PERCEPTIONS, ATMOSPHERE, VIGNETTES, EMOTIONS, BEHAVIOR, HOCKEY, SPORTS, RULES

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 315.39 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
De Waegeneer, Els, and Annick Willem. “Conceptualizations of Fair Play : A Factorial Survey Study of Moral Judgments by Badminton Players.” ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, vol. 26, no. 4, 2016, pp. 312–29, doi:10.1080/10508422.2015.1019071.
APA
De Waegeneer, E., & Willem, A. (2016). Conceptualizations of fair play : a factorial survey study of moral judgments by badminton players. ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 26(4), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2015.1019071
Chicago author-date
De Waegeneer, Els, and Annick Willem. 2016. “Conceptualizations of Fair Play : A Factorial Survey Study of Moral Judgments by Badminton Players.” ETHICS & BEHAVIOR 26 (4): 312–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2015.1019071.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
De Waegeneer, Els, and Annick Willem. 2016. “Conceptualizations of Fair Play : A Factorial Survey Study of Moral Judgments by Badminton Players.” ETHICS & BEHAVIOR 26 (4): 312–329. doi:10.1080/10508422.2015.1019071.
Vancouver
1.
De Waegeneer E, Willem A. Conceptualizations of fair play : a factorial survey study of moral judgments by badminton players. ETHICS & BEHAVIOR. 2016;26(4):312–29.
IEEE
[1]
E. De Waegeneer and A. Willem, “Conceptualizations of fair play : a factorial survey study of moral judgments by badminton players,” ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 312–329, 2016.
@article{8503434,
  abstract     = {{There is much discussion in sports on whether certain behavior should be considered Fair Play. This moral judgment on Fair Play is influenced by the conceptualization of the term Fair Play as either "respect for the rules" or "respect for the spirit of the game," as well as by other determinants. To uncover the moral judgment of athletes and which conceptualization of Fair Play dominates in practice, a factorial survey approach is used. The act and the level of the match played a role in the judgment, as well as the gender of the athlete. Our results showed that both conceptualizations "respect for the rules" and "respect for the spirit of the game" were important in this judgment, with the spirit conceptualization being more dominant.}},
  author       = {{De Waegeneer, Els and Willem, Annick}},
  issn         = {{1050-8422}},
  journal      = {{ETHICS & BEHAVIOR}},
  keywords     = {{ethical decision making,sport ethics,vignette,LEGITIMACY,SOCCER,PERCEPTIONS,ATMOSPHERE,VIGNETTES,EMOTIONS,BEHAVIOR,HOCKEY,SPORTS,RULES}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{312--329}},
  title        = {{Conceptualizations of fair play : a factorial survey study of moral judgments by badminton players}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2015.1019071}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: