Advanced search
1 file | 1.00 MB Add to list

‘Standard’ versus ‘nose reference’ electrode placement for measuring oVEMPs with air-conducted sound : test–retest reliability and preliminary patient results

(2017) CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY. 128(2). p.312-322
Author
Organization
Keywords
Vestibular, Electrode placement, Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic, potential (oVEMP), Test-retest reliability, Air-conducted stimuli, EVOKED MYOGENIC POTENTIALS, SUPERIOR VESTIBULAR NERVE, VESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX, UTRICULAR FUNCTION, UNILATERAL CENTRIFUGATION, EXTRAOCULAR POTENTIALS, STIMULATION, VIBRATION, NEURITIS, MUSCLES

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.00 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Leyssens, Laura et al. “‘Standard’ Versus ‘Nose Reference’ Electrode Placement for Measuring oVEMPs with Air-conducted Sound : Test–retest Reliability and Preliminary Patient Results.” CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY 128.2 (2017): 312–322. Print.
APA
Leyssens, L., Heinze, B., Vinck, B., Van Ombergen, A., Vanspauwen, R., Wuyts, F. L., & Maes, L. (2017). “Standard” versus “nose reference” electrode placement for measuring oVEMPs with air-conducted sound : test–retest reliability and preliminary patient results. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 128(2), 312–322.
Chicago author-date
Leyssens, Laura, Barbara Heinze, Bart Vinck, Angelique Van Ombergen, Robby Vanspauwen, Floris L Wuyts, and Leen Maes. 2017. “‘Standard’ Versus ‘Nose Reference’ Electrode Placement for Measuring oVEMPs with Air-conducted Sound : Test–retest Reliability and Preliminary Patient Results.” Clinical Neurophysiology 128 (2): 312–322.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Leyssens, Laura, Barbara Heinze, Bart Vinck, Angelique Van Ombergen, Robby Vanspauwen, Floris L Wuyts, and Leen Maes. 2017. “‘Standard’ Versus ‘Nose Reference’ Electrode Placement for Measuring oVEMPs with Air-conducted Sound : Test–retest Reliability and Preliminary Patient Results.” Clinical Neurophysiology 128 (2): 312–322.
Vancouver
1.
Leyssens L, Heinze B, Vinck B, Van Ombergen A, Vanspauwen R, Wuyts FL, et al. “Standard” versus “nose reference” electrode placement for measuring oVEMPs with air-conducted sound : test–retest reliability and preliminary patient results. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY. 2017;128(2):312–22.
IEEE
[1]
L. Leyssens et al., “‘Standard’ versus ‘nose reference’ electrode placement for measuring oVEMPs with air-conducted sound : test–retest reliability and preliminary patient results,” CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 312–322, 2017.
@article{8501135,
  author       = {Leyssens, Laura and Heinze, Barbara and Vinck, Bart and Van Ombergen, Angelique and Vanspauwen, Robby and Wuyts, Floris L and Maes, Leen},
  issn         = {1388-2457},
  journal      = {CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY},
  keywords     = {Vestibular,Electrode placement,Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic,potential (oVEMP),Test-retest reliability,Air-conducted stimuli,EVOKED MYOGENIC POTENTIALS,SUPERIOR VESTIBULAR NERVE,VESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX,UTRICULAR FUNCTION,UNILATERAL CENTRIFUGATION,EXTRAOCULAR POTENTIALS,STIMULATION,VIBRATION,NEURITIS,MUSCLES},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {312--322},
  title        = {‘Standard’ versus ‘nose reference’ electrode placement for measuring oVEMPs with air-conducted sound : test–retest reliability and preliminary patient results},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.11.023},
  volume       = {128},
  year         = {2017},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: