Advanced search
1 file | 586.46 KB

Shoes in Buddhist monasteries from India to China : from practical attire to symbol of respect

Ann Heirman (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
One of the most visible identity markers of Buddhist monasticism is clothing. The robes of monks and nuns have been paid considerable attention by researchers. By contrast, other pieces of monastic clothing have attracted far less attention, and this is particularly the case with footwear. Although shoes certainly play a secondary role compared to robes, they still present the monastic community with a number of complex issues. Shoes touch the ground, so they inevitably get dirty. Hence, wearing shoes could be considered disrespectful when meeting someone or paying homage, but so could showing one's naked feet. Meanwhile, shoes protect the feet from dirt and injury on difficult roads, so they may be viewed as essential attire. Additional issues relate to the material and the shape of the footwear, and which shoes are the most appropriate in various situations. This study discusses early Buddhist disciplinary (vinaya) texts' guidelines on issues relating to footwear, and explores how these guidelines were later received within China. It also provides a detailed picture of early Indian and Chinese Buddhist communities' attitudes to shoes, a problematic element of monastic clothing.
Keywords
material culture, shoe, vinaya, Buddhist monasteries

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 586.46 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Heirman, Ann. 2016. “Shoes in Buddhist Monasteries from India to China : from Practical Attire to Symbol of Respect.” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 69 (4): 411–439.
APA
Heirman, Ann. (2016). Shoes in Buddhist monasteries from India to China : from practical attire to symbol of respect. ACTA ORIENTALIA ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE, 69(4), 411–439.
Vancouver
1.
Heirman A. Shoes in Buddhist monasteries from India to China : from practical attire to symbol of respect. ACTA ORIENTALIA ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE. 2016;69(4):411–39.
MLA
Heirman, Ann. “Shoes in Buddhist Monasteries from India to China : from Practical Attire to Symbol of Respect.” ACTA ORIENTALIA ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE 69.4 (2016): 411–439. Print.
@article{8152157,
  abstract     = {One of the most visible identity markers of Buddhist monasticism is clothing. The robes of monks and nuns have been paid considerable attention by researchers. By contrast, other pieces of monastic clothing have attracted far less attention, and this is particularly the case with footwear. Although shoes certainly play a secondary role compared to robes, they still present the monastic community with a number of complex issues. Shoes touch the ground, so they inevitably get dirty. Hence, wearing shoes could be considered disrespectful when meeting someone or paying homage, but so could showing one's naked feet. Meanwhile, shoes protect the feet from dirt and injury on difficult roads, so they may be viewed as essential attire. Additional issues relate to the material and the shape of the footwear, and which shoes are the most appropriate in various situations. This study discusses early Buddhist disciplinary (vinaya) texts' guidelines on issues relating to footwear, and explores how these guidelines were later received within China. It also provides a detailed picture of early Indian and Chinese Buddhist communities' attitudes to shoes, a problematic element of monastic clothing.},
  author       = {Heirman, Ann},
  issn         = {1588-2667},
  journal      = {ACTA ORIENTALIA ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE},
  keyword      = {material culture,shoe,vinaya,Buddhist monasteries},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {411--439},
  title        = {Shoes in Buddhist monasteries from India to China : from practical attire to symbol of respect},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/062.2016.69.4.5},
  volume       = {69},
  year         = {2016},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: