Advanced search
Add to list

Clustering of device-related concerns and Type D personality predicts increased distress in ICD patients independent of shocks

Author
Organization
Abstract
Background: This study examined the impact of clustering of device-related concerns and Type D personality on anxiety and depressive symptoms during a six-month period and the clinical relevance of shocks, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) concerns, and Type D. Methods: Consecutively implanted ICD patients (n=176) completed questionnaires at baseline and six months and were divided into four risk groups: (1) No riskfactors (neither ICD concerns nor Type D); (2) ICD concerns only; (3) Type D only; (4) Clustering (both ICD concerns and Type D). Results: The prevalence of Type D and concerns were 21.6% and 34.7%. Analysis of variance for repeated measures showed a reduction in anxiety over time (P < 0.001), with the risk groups exerting a stable (P=0.14) but differential effect (P < 0.001); the highest level was seen in the clustering group. Similar results were found for depression, although depressive symptoms did not decrease (P=0.08) and the impact of clustering was less clear. These results were confirmed in adjusted analysis, with shocks (P=0.024) also being associated with anxiety but not depression. The impact of ICD concerns and Type D personality on anxiety and depression at baseline and six months was large (>= 0.8) compared to negligible to moderate for shocks (0.0 - 0.6). Conclusions: ICD patients with psychosocial risk factor clustering had the highest level of anxiety, whereas the pattern for depression was less consistent. Shocks influenced outcomes, but the impact was smaller compared to ICD concerns and Type D personality. It may be timely to expand the focus beyond shocks when seeking to identify ICD patients at risk for adverse clinical outcome due to their psychological profile.
Keywords
anxiety, clustering, depressive symptoms, ICD concerns, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Type D personality, IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR, QUALITY-OF-LIFE, PSYCHOSOCIAL RISK-FACTORS, SOCIAL INHIBITION, DEPRESSION SCALE, HOSPITAL ANXIETY, HEART-FAILURE, VENTRICULAR-ARRHYTHMIAS, CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE, NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Pedersen, Susanne S et al. “Clustering of Device-related Concerns and Type D Personality Predicts Increased Distress in ICD Patients Independent of Shocks.” PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY 31.1 (2008): 20–27. Print.
APA
Pedersen, Susanne S, Theuns, D. A., Erdman, R. A., & Jordaens, L. (2008). Clustering of device-related concerns and Type D personality predicts increased distress in ICD patients independent of shocks. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 31(1), 20–27.
Chicago author-date
Pedersen, Susanne S, Dominic AMJ Theuns, Ruud AM Erdman, and Luc Jordaens. 2008. “Clustering of Device-related Concerns and Type D Personality Predicts Increased Distress in ICD Patients Independent of Shocks.” Pace-pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 31 (1): 20–27.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Pedersen, Susanne S, Dominic AMJ Theuns, Ruud AM Erdman, and Luc Jordaens. 2008. “Clustering of Device-related Concerns and Type D Personality Predicts Increased Distress in ICD Patients Independent of Shocks.” Pace-pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 31 (1): 20–27.
Vancouver
1.
Pedersen SS, Theuns DA, Erdman RA, Jordaens L. Clustering of device-related concerns and Type D personality predicts increased distress in ICD patients independent of shocks. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY. 2008;31(1):20–7.
IEEE
[1]
S. S. Pedersen, D. A. Theuns, R. A. Erdman, and L. Jordaens, “Clustering of device-related concerns and Type D personality predicts increased distress in ICD patients independent of shocks,” PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 20–27, 2008.
@article{8151252,
  abstract     = {Background: This study examined the impact of clustering of device-related concerns and Type D personality on anxiety and depressive symptoms during a six-month period and the clinical relevance of shocks, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) concerns, and Type D. 
Methods: Consecutively implanted ICD patients (n=176) completed questionnaires at baseline and six months and were divided into four risk groups: (1) No riskfactors (neither ICD concerns nor Type D); (2) ICD concerns only; (3) Type D only; (4) Clustering (both ICD concerns and Type D). 
Results: The prevalence of Type D and concerns were 21.6% and 34.7%. Analysis of variance for repeated measures showed a reduction in anxiety over time (P < 0.001), with the risk groups exerting a stable (P=0.14) but differential effect (P < 0.001); the highest level was seen in the clustering group. Similar results were found for depression, although depressive symptoms did not decrease (P=0.08) and the impact of clustering was less clear. These results were confirmed in adjusted analysis, with shocks (P=0.024) also being associated with anxiety but not depression. The impact of ICD concerns and Type D personality on anxiety and depression at baseline and six months was large (>= 0.8) compared to negligible to moderate for shocks (0.0 - 0.6). 
Conclusions: ICD patients with psychosocial risk factor clustering had the highest level of anxiety, whereas the pattern for depression was less consistent. Shocks influenced outcomes, but the impact was smaller compared to ICD concerns and Type D personality. It may be timely to expand the focus beyond shocks when seeking to identify ICD patients at risk for adverse clinical outcome due to their psychological profile.},
  author       = {Pedersen, Susanne S and Theuns, Dominic AMJ and Erdman, Ruud AM and Jordaens, Luc},
  issn         = {0147-8389},
  journal      = {PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY},
  keywords     = {anxiety,clustering,depressive symptoms,ICD concerns,implantable cardioverter defibrillator,Type D personality,IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR,QUALITY-OF-LIFE,PSYCHOSOCIAL RISK-FACTORS,SOCIAL INHIBITION,DEPRESSION SCALE,HOSPITAL ANXIETY,HEART-FAILURE,VENTRICULAR-ARRHYTHMIAS,CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE,NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {20--27},
  title        = {Clustering of device-related concerns and Type D personality predicts increased distress in ICD patients independent of shocks},
  volume       = {31},
  year         = {2008},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: