Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Flagging false positives following untargeted LCMS characterization of histone PTM combinations

Sander Willems UGent, Maarten Dhaenens UGent, Elisabeth Govaert UGent, Laura De Clerck UGent, Paulien Meert, Christophe Van Neste UGent, Filip Van Nieuwerburgh UGent and Dieter Deforce UGent (2017) JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH. 16(2). p.655-664
abstract
Epigenetic changes can be studied with an untargeted characterization of histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) by LCMS. While prior information about more than twenty types of histone PTMs exists, little is known about histone PTM combinations (PTMCs). Due to the combinatorial explosion it is intrinsically impossible to consider all potential PTMCs in a database search. Consequentially, high-scoring false positives with unconsidered but correct alternative isobaric PTMCs can occur. Current quality controls can neither estimate the amount of unconsidered alternatives nor flag potential false positives. Here, we propose a conceptual workflow that provides such options. In this workflow, an in silico modelling of all candidate isoforms with known-to-exist PTMs is made. The most frequently occurring PTM sets of these candidate isoforms are determined and used in several database searches. This suppresses the combinatorial explosion while considering as many candidate isoforms as possible. Finally, annotations can be classified as unique or ambiguous, the latter implying false positives. This workflow was evaluated on an LCMS dataset containing 44 histone extracts. We were able to consider 60% of all candidate isoforms. Importantly, 40% of all annotations were classified as ambiguous. This highlights the need for a more thorough evaluation of modified peptide annotations.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
combinatorial explosion, histone, mass spectrometry (MS), post-translational modification (PTM), quality control, MASS-SPECTROMETRY ANALYSIS, DATABASE SEARCH, QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT, PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION, SIDE REACTIONS, MS/MS SPECTRA, DATA SETS, PROTEOMICS, PROPIONYLATION, PERFORMANCE
journal title
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
J. Proteome Res.
volume
16
issue
2
pages
655 - 664
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000393539600027
ISSN
1535-3893
DOI
10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00724
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
8149732
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8149732
date created
2016-11-10 14:27:28
date last changed
2018-01-10 08:04:06
@article{8149732,
  abstract     = {Epigenetic changes can be studied with an untargeted characterization of histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) by LCMS. While prior information about more than twenty types of histone PTMs exists, little is known about histone PTM combinations (PTMCs). Due to the combinatorial explosion it is intrinsically impossible to consider all potential PTMCs in a database search. Consequentially, high-scoring false positives with unconsidered but correct alternative isobaric PTMCs can occur. Current quality controls can neither estimate the amount of unconsidered alternatives nor flag potential false positives. Here, we propose a conceptual workflow that provides such options. In this workflow, an in silico modelling of all candidate isoforms with known-to-exist PTMs is made. The most frequently occurring PTM sets of these candidate isoforms are determined and used in several database searches. This suppresses the combinatorial explosion while considering as many candidate isoforms as possible. Finally, annotations can be classified as unique or ambiguous, the latter implying false positives. This workflow was evaluated on an LCMS dataset containing 44 histone extracts. We were able to consider 60\% of all candidate isoforms. Importantly, 40\% of all annotations were classified as ambiguous. This highlights the need for a more thorough evaluation of modified peptide annotations.},
  author       = {Willems, Sander and Dhaenens, Maarten and Govaert, Elisabeth and De Clerck, Laura and Meert, Paulien and Van Neste, Christophe and Van Nieuwerburgh, Filip and Deforce, Dieter},
  issn         = {1535-3893},
  journal      = {JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH},
  keyword      = {combinatorial explosion,histone,mass spectrometry (MS),post-translational modification (PTM),quality control,MASS-SPECTROMETRY ANALYSIS,DATABASE SEARCH,QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT,PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION,SIDE REACTIONS,MS/MS SPECTRA,DATA SETS,PROTEOMICS,PROPIONYLATION,PERFORMANCE},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {655--664},
  title        = {Flagging false positives following untargeted LCMS characterization of histone PTM combinations},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00724},
  volume       = {16},
  year         = {2017},
}

Chicago
Willems, Sander, Maarten Dhaenens, Elisabeth Govaert, Laura De Clerck, Paulien Meert, Christophe Van Neste, Filip Van Nieuwerburgh, and Dieter Deforce. 2017. “Flagging False Positives Following Untargeted LCMS Characterization of Histone PTM Combinations.” Journal of Proteome Research 16 (2): 655–664.
APA
Willems, Sander, Dhaenens, M., Govaert, E., De Clerck, L., Meert, P., Van Neste, C., Van Nieuwerburgh, F., et al. (2017). Flagging false positives following untargeted LCMS characterization of histone PTM combinations. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 16(2), 655–664.
Vancouver
1.
Willems S, Dhaenens M, Govaert E, De Clerck L, Meert P, Van Neste C, et al. Flagging false positives following untargeted LCMS characterization of histone PTM combinations. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH. 2017;16(2):655–64.
MLA
Willems, Sander, Maarten Dhaenens, Elisabeth Govaert, et al. “Flagging False Positives Following Untargeted LCMS Characterization of Histone PTM Combinations.” JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH 16.2 (2017): 655–664. Print.