Advanced search
1 file | 97.24 KB Add to list

Een extra positie?

(2016) NEDERLANDSE TAALKUNDE. 21(2). p.285-296
Author
Organization
Abstract
An extra position? The present paper discusses the VP-topicalization and the mirror effect. According to the Syntax of Dutch (Broekhuis & Corver 2016), these two tests can make a reliable, non-intuitive distinction between the postfield and the afterthought, as well as between the middle field and the postfield, which is often not noticeable in main clauses with only a finite verb. Although these tests seem valuable indeed, even to non-generative studies, there are also some limitations, and especially for prepositional phrases (PPs) which can be either placed in the middle field or in the postfield. Furthermore, this paper also aims at refining the motivations of extraposition, and more particularly extraposition of PPs. We therefore rely on empirical corpus-based research, which can fine-tune the theoretical framework of extraposition in the Syntax of Dutch
Keywords
mirror effect, Dutch, PP placement, VP-topicalization, extraposition

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 97.24 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Willems, Annelore. “Een Extra Positie?” NEDERLANDSE TAALKUNDE, vol. 21, no. 2, 2016, pp. 285–96.
APA
Willems, A. (2016). Een extra positie? NEDERLANDSE TAALKUNDE, 21(2), 285–296.
Chicago author-date
Willems, Annelore. 2016. “Een Extra Positie?” NEDERLANDSE TAALKUNDE 21 (2): 285–96.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Willems, Annelore. 2016. “Een Extra Positie?” NEDERLANDSE TAALKUNDE 21 (2): 285–296.
Vancouver
1.
Willems A. Een extra positie? NEDERLANDSE TAALKUNDE. 2016;21(2):285–96.
IEEE
[1]
A. Willems, “Een extra positie?,” NEDERLANDSE TAALKUNDE, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 285–296, 2016.
@article{8134532,
  abstract     = {{An extra position?
The present paper discusses the VP-topicalization and the mirror effect. According to the Syntax of Dutch (Broekhuis & Corver 2016), these two tests can make a reliable, non-intuitive distinction between the postfield and the afterthought, as well as between the middle field and the postfield, which is often not noticeable in main clauses with only a finite verb. Although these tests seem valuable indeed, even to non-generative studies, there are also some limitations, and especially for prepositional phrases (PPs) which can be either placed in the middle field or in the postfield. Furthermore, this paper also aims at refining the motivations of extraposition, and more particularly extraposition of PPs. We therefore rely on empirical corpus-based research, which can fine-tune the theoretical framework of extraposition in the Syntax of Dutch}},
  author       = {{Willems, Annelore}},
  issn         = {{1384-5845}},
  journal      = {{NEDERLANDSE TAALKUNDE}},
  keywords     = {{mirror effect,Dutch,PP placement,VP-topicalization,extraposition}},
  language     = {{dut}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{285--296}},
  title        = {{Een extra positie?}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}