Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 539.86 KB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Research in public health and end-of-...

Research in public health and end-of-life care : building on the past and developing the new

Libby Sallnow, Carol Tishelman, Olav Lindqvist, Heather Richardson and Joachim Cohen (UGent)
(2016) PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE. 24(1). p.25-30
Author
Organization
Abstract
Introduction: Public health approaches offer the opportunity to move beyond clinical and health services approaches to end-of-life (EoL) care, to focus on whole populations, individuals and communities rather than patients and carers. They also allow concepts such as capacity, resilience, and wellbeing to come to the fore. Methods: This paper, drawing on the experience of a diverse group of academics and practitioners from three countries in Europe, considers the research challenges related to examining new public health approaches to EoL care and how learning from more traditional or classic public health research can influence a future research agenda. Additional opportunities provided by the new public health approach to broaden learning and participation in research are considered. Results: By bringing together strong traditional methods such as analysis of longitudinal population-level data with participatory approaches that draw on communities' experience and aspirations for care, the authors suggest that new and improved opportunities exist to evaluate the impact of participatory approaches. Discussion: In conclusion, the paper urges researchers from classic and new public health to work in partnership to generate and respond to the emerging research agenda around new public health initiatives. There is much to be learned from both.
Keywords
Public health, Health promotion, End-of-life care, Research methods, DEATH CERTIFICATE DATA, CANCER, PLACE, HOSPITALS, COUNTRIES, NETWORKS, FLANDERS, BELGIUM, EUROPE, HOME, EoLC

Downloads

  • Download
    (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 539.86 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Sallnow, Libby, et al. “Research in Public Health and End-of-Life Care : Building on the Past and Developing the New.” PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE, vol. 24, no. 1, 2016, pp. 25–30, doi:10.1080/09699260.2015.1101260.
APA
Sallnow, L., Tishelman, C., Lindqvist, O., Richardson, H., & Cohen, J. (2016). Research in public health and end-of-life care : building on the past and developing the new. PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE, 24(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2015.1101260
Chicago author-date
Sallnow, Libby, Carol Tishelman, Olav Lindqvist, Heather Richardson, and Joachim Cohen. 2016. “Research in Public Health and End-of-Life Care : Building on the Past and Developing the New.” PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE 24 (1): 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2015.1101260.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Sallnow, Libby, Carol Tishelman, Olav Lindqvist, Heather Richardson, and Joachim Cohen. 2016. “Research in Public Health and End-of-Life Care : Building on the Past and Developing the New.” PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE 24 (1): 25–30. doi:10.1080/09699260.2015.1101260.
Vancouver
1.
Sallnow L, Tishelman C, Lindqvist O, Richardson H, Cohen J. Research in public health and end-of-life care : building on the past and developing the new. PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE. 2016;24(1):25–30.
IEEE
[1]
L. Sallnow, C. Tishelman, O. Lindqvist, H. Richardson, and J. Cohen, “Research in public health and end-of-life care : building on the past and developing the new,” PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2016.
@article{8129890,
  abstract     = {{Introduction: Public health approaches offer the opportunity to move beyond clinical and health services approaches to end-of-life (EoL) care, to focus on whole populations, individuals and communities rather than patients and carers. They also allow concepts such as capacity, resilience, and wellbeing to come to the fore. Methods: This paper, drawing on the experience of a diverse group of academics and practitioners from three countries in Europe, considers the research challenges related to examining new public health approaches to EoL care and how learning from more traditional or classic public health research can influence a future research agenda. Additional opportunities provided by the new public health approach to broaden learning and participation in research are considered. Results: By bringing together strong traditional methods such as analysis of longitudinal population-level data with participatory approaches that draw on communities' experience and aspirations for care, the authors suggest that new and improved opportunities exist to evaluate the impact of participatory approaches. Discussion: In conclusion, the paper urges researchers from classic and new public health to work in partnership to generate and respond to the emerging research agenda around new public health initiatives. There is much to be learned from both.}},
  author       = {{Sallnow, Libby and Tishelman, Carol and Lindqvist, Olav and Richardson, Heather and Cohen, Joachim}},
  issn         = {{0969-9260}},
  journal      = {{PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE}},
  keywords     = {{Public health,Health promotion,End-of-life care,Research methods,DEATH CERTIFICATE DATA,CANCER,PLACE,HOSPITALS,COUNTRIES,NETWORKS,FLANDERS,BELGIUM,EUROPE,HOME,EoLC}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{25--30}},
  title        = {{Research in public health and end-of-life care : building on the past and developing the new}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2015.1101260}},
  volume       = {{24}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}
Altmetric
View in Altmetric