Advanced search
1 file | 385.56 KB

Who is leading the campaign charts? Comparing individual popularity on old and new media

Author
Organization
Keywords
SOCIAL MEDIA, ELECTION CAMPAIGN, POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, PUBLIC SPHERE, TWITTER, INTERNET, ONLINE, NEWS, NEWSPAPERS, NETWORKING

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 385.56 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Van Aelst, Peter, Patrick van Erkel, Evelien D’heer, and Raymond A. Harder. 2017. “Who Is Leading the Campaign Charts? Comparing Individual Popularity on Old and New Media.” Information Communication & Society 20 (5): 715–732.
APA
Van Aelst, P., van Erkel, P., D’heer, E., & A. Harder, R. (2017). Who is leading the campaign charts? Comparing individual popularity on old and new media. INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 20(5), 715–732.
Vancouver
1.
Van Aelst P, van Erkel P, D’heer E, A. Harder R. Who is leading the campaign charts? Comparing individual popularity on old and new media. INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY. 2017;20(5):715–32.
MLA
Van Aelst, Peter et al. “Who Is Leading the Campaign Charts? Comparing Individual Popularity on Old and New Media.” INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY 20.5 (2017): 715–732. Print.
@article{8038446,
  author       = {Van Aelst, Peter and van Erkel, Patrick and D'heer, Evelien and A. Harder, Raymond},
  issn         = {1369-118X},
  journal      = {INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY},
  keywords     = {SOCIAL MEDIA,ELECTION CAMPAIGN,POLITICAL COMMUNICATION,PUBLIC SPHERE,TWITTER,INTERNET,ONLINE,NEWS,NEWSPAPERS,NETWORKING},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {5},
  pages        = {715--732},
  title        = {Who is leading the campaign charts? Comparing individual popularity on old and new media},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1203973},
  volume       = {20},
  year         = {2017},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: