Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Parameters influencing glenoid loosening

Tannetje Jannetje Adriana Karelse, Alexander Van Tongel UGent, Tom Van Isacker, Bart Berghs and Lieven De Wilde UGent (2016) EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES. 13(8). p.773-784
abstract
Introduction: There is a lack of organization in existing studies on the outcome and complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. As a result, it is difficult to gain substantial evidence regarding the rate and risk factors for the occurrence of glenoid loosening which remains the most common cause of prosthetic failure. To improve the quality of future studies, an agreement should exist on definitions of glenoid loosening and on the potential risk factors. Areas covered: Reviewing the literature, loosening can be defined as the appearance of radiolucent lines, radiological loosening, clinical loosening and revision as the end stage. Three different categories of influencing parameters can be distinguished: implant related, patient related and surgeon related. Expert commentary: The aim of this review is to organize the available knowledge on glenoid failure, as well as to describe the gaps so that it will constructively contribute to the debate on how to prevent glenoid failure in the anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (review)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
Glenoid component, glenoid loosening, total shoulder arthroplasty, radiolucent lines glenoid, glenoid erosion, glenoid plane, inclination, retroversion, surgical experience, glenoid component failure, TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY, 3-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, GLENOHUMERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS, HUMERAL HEAD, CEMENTING TECHNIQUES, COMPONENT INSERTION, RADIOLUCENT LINES, POSTERIOR EROSION, PROSTHETIC DESIGN, PROXIMAL HUMERUS
journal title
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES
Expert Rev. Med. Devices
volume
13
issue
8
pages
773 - 784
Web of Science type
Review
Web of Science id
000381379900009
JCR category
ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
JCR impact factor
2.228 (2016)
JCR rank
32/77 (2016)
JCR quartile
2 (2016)
ISSN
1743-4440
DOI
10.1080/17434440.2016.1205483
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
8038381
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8038381
date created
2016-07-18 14:44:15
date last changed
2017-06-28 11:02:25
@article{8038381,
  abstract     = {Introduction: There is a lack of organization in existing studies on the outcome and complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. As a result, it is difficult to gain substantial evidence regarding the rate and risk factors for the occurrence of glenoid loosening which remains the most common cause of prosthetic failure. To improve the quality of future studies, an agreement should exist on definitions of glenoid loosening and on the potential risk factors.
Areas covered: Reviewing the literature, loosening can be defined as the appearance of radiolucent lines, radiological loosening, clinical loosening and revision as the end stage. Three different categories of influencing parameters can be distinguished: implant related, patient related and surgeon related.
Expert commentary: The aim of this review is to organize the available knowledge on glenoid failure, as well as to describe the gaps so that it will constructively contribute to the debate on how to prevent glenoid failure in the anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.},
  author       = {Karelse, Tannetje Jannetje Adriana and Van Tongel, Alexander and Van Isacker, Tom and Berghs, Bart and De Wilde, Lieven},
  issn         = {1743-4440},
  journal      = {EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES},
  keyword      = {Glenoid component,glenoid loosening,total shoulder arthroplasty,radiolucent lines glenoid,glenoid erosion,glenoid plane,inclination,retroversion,surgical experience,glenoid component failure,TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY,3-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY,GLENOHUMERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS,HUMERAL HEAD,CEMENTING TECHNIQUES,COMPONENT INSERTION,RADIOLUCENT LINES,POSTERIOR EROSION,PROSTHETIC DESIGN,PROXIMAL HUMERUS},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {8},
  pages        = {773--784},
  title        = {Parameters influencing glenoid loosening},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2016.1205483},
  volume       = {13},
  year         = {2016},
}

Chicago
Karelse, Tannetje Jannetje Adriana, Alexander Van Tongel, Tom Van Isacker, Bart Berghs, and Lieven De Wilde. 2016. “Parameters Influencing Glenoid Loosening.” Expert Review of Medical Devices 13 (8): 773–784.
APA
Karelse, T. J. A., Van Tongel, A., Van Isacker, T., Berghs, B., & De Wilde, L. (2016). Parameters influencing glenoid loosening. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 13(8), 773–784.
Vancouver
1.
Karelse TJA, Van Tongel A, Van Isacker T, Berghs B, De Wilde L. Parameters influencing glenoid loosening. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES. 2016;13(8):773–84.
MLA
Karelse, Tannetje Jannetje Adriana, Alexander Van Tongel, Tom Van Isacker, et al. “Parameters Influencing Glenoid Loosening.” EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES 13.8 (2016): 773–784. Print.