Abstract representations of number: what interactions with number form do not prove and priming effects do
- Author
- Seppe Santens (UGent) , Wim Fias (UGent) and Tom Verguts (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- We challenge the arguments of Cohen Kadosh & Walsh (CK&W) on two grounds. First, interactions between number form (e.g., notation, format, modality) and an experimental factor do not show that the notations/formats/modalities are processed separately. Second, we discuss evidence that numbers are coded abstractly, also when riot required by task demands and processed unintentionally, thus challenging the authors' dual-code account
- Keywords
- KUNDE, MODEL
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-791130
- MLA
- Santens, Seppe, et al. “Abstract Representations of Number: What Interactions with Number Form Do Not Prove and Priming Effects Do.” BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, vol. 32, no. 3–4, 2009, pp. 351–52, doi:10.1017/S0140525X09990872.
- APA
- Santens, S., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Abstract representations of number: what interactions with number form do not prove and priming effects do. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09990872
- Chicago author-date
- Santens, Seppe, Wim Fias, and Tom Verguts. 2009. “Abstract Representations of Number: What Interactions with Number Form Do Not Prove and Priming Effects Do.” BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09990872.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Santens, Seppe, Wim Fias, and Tom Verguts. 2009. “Abstract Representations of Number: What Interactions with Number Form Do Not Prove and Priming Effects Do.” BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09990872.
- Vancouver
- 1.Santens S, Fias W, Verguts T. Abstract representations of number: what interactions with number form do not prove and priming effects do. Vol. 32, BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES. 2009. p. 351–2.
- IEEE
- [1]S. Santens, W. Fias, and T. Verguts, “Abstract representations of number: what interactions with number form do not prove and priming effects do,” BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, vol. 32, no. 3–4. pp. 351–352, 2009.
@misc{791130, abstract = {{We challenge the arguments of Cohen Kadosh & Walsh (CK&W) on two grounds. First, interactions between number form (e.g., notation, format, modality) and an experimental factor do not show that the notations/formats/modalities are processed separately. Second, we discuss evidence that numbers are coded abstractly, also when riot required by task demands and processed unintentionally, thus challenging the authors' dual-code account}}, author = {{Santens, Seppe and Fias, Wim and Verguts, Tom}}, issn = {{0140-525X}}, keywords = {{KUNDE,MODEL}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{3-4}}, pages = {{351--352}}, series = {{BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES}}, title = {{Abstract representations of number: what interactions with number form do not prove and priming effects do}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09990872}}, volume = {{32}}, year = {{2009}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: