Advanced search
1 file | 2.43 MB Add to list

Penile reconstruction: is the radial forearm flap really the standard technique?

Stan Monstrey (UGent) , Piet Hoebeke (UGent) , Gennaro Selvaggi (UGent) , Peter Ceulemans, Koenraad Van Landuyt (UGent) , Phillip Blondeel (UGent) , Moustapha Hamdi (UGent) , Nathalie Roche (UGent) , Steven Weyers (UGent) and GRETA DE CUYPERE (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
Background: The ideal goals in penile reconstruction are well described, but the multitude of flaps used for phalloplasty only demonstrates that none of these techniques is considered ideal. Still, the radial forearm flap is the most frequently used flap and universally considered as the standard technique. Methods: In this article, the authors describe the largest series to date of 287 radial forearm phalloplasties performed by the same surgical team. Many different outcome parameters have been described separately in previously published articles, but the main purpose of this review is to critically evaluate to what degree this supposed standard technique has been able to meet the ideal goals in penile reconstruction. Results: Outcome parameters such as number of procedures, complications, aesthetic outcome, tactile and erogenous sensation, voiding, donor-site morbidity, scrotoplasty, and sexual intercourse are assessed. Conclusions: In the absence of prospective randomized studies, it is not possible to prove whether the radial forearm flap truly is the standard technique in penile reconstruction. However, this large study demonstrates that the radial forearm phalloplasty is a very reliable technique for the creation, mostly in two stages, of a normal-appearing penis and scrotum, always allowing the patient to void while standing and in most cases also to experience sexual satisfaction. The relative disadvantages of this technique are the rather high number of initial fistulas, the residual scar on the forearm, and the potential long-term urologic complications. Despite the lack of actual data to support this statement, the authors feel strongly that a multidisciplinary approach with close cooperation between the reconstructive/plastic surgeon and the urologist is an absolute requisite for obtaining the best possible results.
Keywords
TOTAL PHALLOPLASTY, FIBULA FLAP, FEMALE TRANSSEXUALS, TO-MALE TRANSSEXUALS, SEX REASSIGNMENT SURGERY, CONSTRUCTION, EXPERIENCE

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.43 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Monstrey, Stan et al. “Penile Reconstruction: Is the Radial Forearm Flap Really the Standard Technique?” PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 124.2 (2009): 510–518. Print.
APA
Monstrey, S., Hoebeke, P., Selvaggi, G., Ceulemans, P., Van Landuyt, K., Blondeel, P., Hamdi, M., et al. (2009). Penile reconstruction: is the radial forearm flap really the standard technique? PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 124(2), 510–518.
Chicago author-date
Monstrey, Stan, Piet Hoebeke, Gennaro Selvaggi, Peter Ceulemans, Koenraad Van Landuyt, Phillip Blondeel, Moustapha Hamdi, Nathalie Roche, Steven Weyers, and GRETA DE CUYPERE. 2009. “Penile Reconstruction: Is the Radial Forearm Flap Really the Standard Technique?” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 124 (2): 510–518.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Monstrey, Stan, Piet Hoebeke, Gennaro Selvaggi, Peter Ceulemans, Koenraad Van Landuyt, Phillip Blondeel, Moustapha Hamdi, Nathalie Roche, Steven Weyers, and GRETA DE CUYPERE. 2009. “Penile Reconstruction: Is the Radial Forearm Flap Really the Standard Technique?” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 124 (2): 510–518.
Vancouver
1.
Monstrey S, Hoebeke P, Selvaggi G, Ceulemans P, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel P, et al. Penile reconstruction: is the radial forearm flap really the standard technique? PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY. 2009;124(2):510–8.
IEEE
[1]
S. Monstrey et al., “Penile reconstruction: is the radial forearm flap really the standard technique?,” PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 510–518, 2009.
@article{732061,
  abstract     = {Background: The ideal goals in penile reconstruction are well described, but the multitude of flaps used for phalloplasty only demonstrates that none of these techniques is considered ideal. Still, the radial forearm flap is the most frequently used flap and universally considered as the standard technique.
Methods: In this article, the authors describe the largest series to date of 287 radial forearm phalloplasties performed by the same surgical team. Many different outcome parameters have been described separately in previously published articles, but the main purpose of this review is to critically evaluate to what degree this supposed standard technique has been able to meet the ideal goals in penile reconstruction.
Results: Outcome parameters such as number of procedures, complications, aesthetic outcome, tactile and erogenous sensation, voiding, donor-site morbidity, scrotoplasty, and sexual intercourse are assessed.
Conclusions: In the absence of prospective randomized studies, it is not possible to prove whether the radial forearm flap truly is the standard technique in penile reconstruction. However, this large study demonstrates that the radial forearm phalloplasty is a very reliable technique for the creation, mostly in two stages, of a normal-appearing penis and scrotum, always allowing the patient to void while standing and in most cases also to experience sexual satisfaction. The relative disadvantages of this technique are the rather high number of initial fistulas, the residual scar on the forearm, and the potential long-term urologic complications. Despite the lack of actual data to support this statement, the authors feel strongly that a multidisciplinary approach with close cooperation between the reconstructive/plastic surgeon and the urologist is an absolute requisite for obtaining the best possible results.},
  author       = {Monstrey, Stan and Hoebeke, Piet and Selvaggi, Gennaro and Ceulemans, Peter and Van Landuyt, Koenraad and Blondeel, Phillip and Hamdi, Moustapha and Roche, Nathalie and Weyers, Steven and DE CUYPERE, GRETA},
  issn         = {0032-1052},
  journal      = {PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY},
  keywords     = {TOTAL PHALLOPLASTY,FIBULA FLAP,FEMALE TRANSSEXUALS,TO-MALE TRANSSEXUALS,SEX REASSIGNMENT SURGERY,CONSTRUCTION,EXPERIENCE},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {510--518},
  title        = {Penile reconstruction: is the radial forearm flap really the standard technique?},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aeeb06},
  volume       = {124},
  year         = {2009},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: