Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

The construct validity of the Dutch personality inventory for DSM-5 personality disorders (PID-5) in a clinical sample

Tim Bastiaens, Laurence Claes, Smits Dirk, Barbara De Clercq UGent, Filip De Fruyt UGent, Gina Rossi, Dominique Vanwalleghem, Rudi Vermote, Benedicte Lowyck, Stephan Claes, et al. (2016) ASSESSMENT. 23(1). p.42-51
abstract
The factor structure and the convergent validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), a self-report questionnaire designed to measure personality pathology as advocated in the fifth edition, Section III of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), are already demonstrated in general population samples, but need replication in clinical samples. In 240 Flemish inpatients, we examined the factor structure of the PID-5 by means of exploratory structural equation modeling. Additionally, we investigated differences in PID-5 higher order domain scores according to gender, age and educational level, and explored convergent and discriminant validity by relating the PID-5 with the Dimensional Assessment of Personality PathologyBasic Questionnaire and by comparing PID-5 scores of inpatients with and without a DSM-IV categorical personality disorder diagnosis. Our results confirmed the original five-factor structure of the PID-5. The reliability and the convergent and discriminant validity of the PID-5 proved to be adequate. Implications for future research are discussed.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
PATHOLOGICAL PERSONALITY, TRAIT MODEL, PSYCHOPATHOLOGY-5 PSY-5, GENERAL PERSONALITY, DIMENSIONAL MODELS, MALADAPTIVE TRAITS, FIT INDEXES, IV, CULTURES, AGE, PID-5, personality disorders, personality traits, DSM-5, assessment
journal title
ASSESSMENT
volume
23
issue
1
pages
42 - 51
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000368592900005
JCR category
PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
JCR impact factor
3.062 (2016)
JCR rank
22/121 (2016)
JCR quartile
1 (2016)
ISSN
1073-1911
DOI
10.1177/1073191115575069
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
7280701
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-7280701
date created
2016-06-23 17:28:49
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:42:32
@article{7280701,
  abstract     = {The factor structure and the convergent validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), a self-report questionnaire designed to measure personality pathology as advocated in the fifth edition, Section III of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), are already demonstrated in general population samples, but need replication in clinical samples. In 240 Flemish inpatients, we examined the factor structure of the PID-5 by means of exploratory structural equation modeling. Additionally, we investigated differences in PID-5 higher order domain scores according to gender, age and educational level, and explored convergent and discriminant validity by relating the PID-5 with the Dimensional Assessment of Personality PathologyBasic Questionnaire and by comparing PID-5 scores of inpatients with and without a DSM-IV categorical personality disorder diagnosis. Our results confirmed the original five-factor structure of the PID-5. The reliability and the convergent and discriminant validity of the PID-5 proved to be adequate. Implications for future research are discussed.},
  author       = {Bastiaens, Tim and Claes, Laurence and Dirk, Smits and De Clercq, Barbara and De Fruyt, Filip and Rossi, Gina and Vanwalleghem, Dominique and Vermote, Rudi and Lowyck, Benedicte and Claes, Stephan and De Hert, Marc},
  issn         = {1073-1911},
  journal      = {ASSESSMENT},
  keyword      = {PATHOLOGICAL PERSONALITY,TRAIT MODEL,PSYCHOPATHOLOGY-5 PSY-5,GENERAL PERSONALITY,DIMENSIONAL MODELS,MALADAPTIVE TRAITS,FIT INDEXES,IV,CULTURES,AGE,PID-5,personality disorders,personality traits,DSM-5,assessment},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {42--51},
  title        = {The construct validity of the Dutch personality inventory for DSM-5 personality disorders (PID-5) in a clinical sample},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191115575069},
  volume       = {23},
  year         = {2016},
}

Chicago
Bastiaens, Tim, Laurence Claes, Smits Dirk, Barbara De Clercq, Filip De Fruyt, Gina Rossi, Dominique Vanwalleghem, et al. 2016. “The Construct Validity of the Dutch Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample.” Assessment 23 (1): 42–51.
APA
Bastiaens, T., Claes, L., Dirk, S., De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., Rossi, G., Vanwalleghem, D., et al. (2016). The construct validity of the Dutch personality inventory for DSM-5 personality disorders (PID-5) in a clinical sample. ASSESSMENT, 23(1), 42–51.
Vancouver
1.
Bastiaens T, Claes L, Dirk S, De Clercq B, De Fruyt F, Rossi G, et al. The construct validity of the Dutch personality inventory for DSM-5 personality disorders (PID-5) in a clinical sample. ASSESSMENT. 2016;23(1):42–51.
MLA
Bastiaens, Tim, Laurence Claes, Smits Dirk, et al. “The Construct Validity of the Dutch Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample.” ASSESSMENT 23.1 (2016): 42–51. Print.