European Court of Human Rights: Pinto Coelho v. Portugal (no. 2)
- Author
- Dirk Voorhoof (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- In a judgment of 22 March 2016 the European Court of Human Rights found that Portugal has violated a journalist’s right to report about the hearing in a criminal case. The European Court emphasises that the domestic court hearing was public and that the criminal conviction of the journalist for having broadcast unauthorised recordings of statements of witnesses during the hearing was not necessary in a democratic society. Therefore the journalist’s conviction amounted to a breach of Article 10 of the European Convention.
- Keywords
- secret of investigation, open justice, fair trial, Crime and court reporting, freedom of expression, HRC
Downloads
-
IRIS2016.6.PintoCoelho2Portugal.pdf
- full text
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 492.29 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-7249959
- MLA
- Voorhoof, Dirk. “European Court of Human Rights: Pinto Coelho v. Portugal (No. 2).” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 6, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2016, pp. 3–4.
- APA
- Voorhoof, D. (2016). European Court of Human Rights: Pinto Coelho v. Portugal (no. 2). IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), (6), 3–4.
- Chicago author-date
- Voorhoof, Dirk. 2016. “European Court of Human Rights: Pinto Coelho v. Portugal (No. 2).” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 6: 3–4.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Voorhoof, Dirk. 2016. “European Court of Human Rights: Pinto Coelho v. Portugal (No. 2).” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE) (6): 3–4.
- Vancouver
- 1.Voorhoof D. European Court of Human Rights: Pinto Coelho v. Portugal (no. 2). IRIS (ENGLISH ED ONLINE). 2016;(6):3–4.
- IEEE
- [1]D. Voorhoof, “European Court of Human Rights: Pinto Coelho v. Portugal (no. 2),” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 6, pp. 3–4, 2016.
@article{7249959, abstract = {{In a judgment of 22 March 2016 the European Court of Human Rights found that Portugal has violated a journalist’s right to report about the hearing in a criminal case. The European Court emphasises that the domestic court hearing was public and that the criminal conviction of the journalist for having broadcast unauthorised recordings of statements of witnesses during the hearing was not necessary in a democratic society. Therefore the journalist’s conviction amounted to a breach of Article 10 of the European Convention.}}, author = {{Voorhoof, Dirk}}, issn = {{2078-6158}}, journal = {{IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE)}}, keywords = {{secret of investigation,open justice,fair trial,Crime and court reporting,freedom of expression,HRC}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{6}}, pages = {{3--4}}, publisher = {{European Audiovisual Observatory}}, title = {{European Court of Human Rights: Pinto Coelho v. Portugal (no. 2)}}, url = {{http://merlin.obs.coe.int/newsletter.php?year=2016&issue=6&iris_ref=2016+6+1}}, year = {{2016}}, }