Euratom as the 'outsider whitin': the specificity of the European Atomic Energy Community examined in the light of the health and safety and the safeguards regimes
(2015)
- Author
- Ilina Cenevska (UGent)
- Promoter
- Inge Govaere (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- The thesis focuses on the radiation protection and nuclear safety (health and safety) and the nuclear safeguards regimes devised under the Euratom Treaty and the Euratom secondary legislation. The fields of nuclear safeguards, on the one hand, and radiation protection and nuclear safety, on the other, are arguably the two most prominent fields covered by the Euratom Treaty that can be credited for the remarkable endurance of the Euratom project to the present day and are, ultimately, the two fields where the specificity of the Euratom Community predominantly lies. The thesis explores the following research questions: How do the Euratom safeguards and health and safety regimes interact with the Union’s environmental policy and the Union’s non-proliferation policy as their respective proxies developed under the Union framework stricto sensu (i.e. the framework created under the Union Treaties)? What are the inconsistencies or lacunae underlying this interaction? Do the two Euratom-devised regimes and the corresponding Union policies they most commonly interact with and are most immediately linked to in terms of their respective subject matter fully complement each other or are there any problematic issues or issues of conflict that characterise their relationship? Are such differences reconcilable and surmountable, and in what way?
Downloads
-
CenevskaThesis-FINAL2015.pdf
- full text
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 2.75 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-7208075
- MLA
- Cenevska, Ilina. Euratom as the “Outsider Whitin”: The Specificity of the European Atomic Energy Community Examined in the Light of the Health and Safety and the Safeguards Regimes. Ghent University. Faculty of Law, 2015.
- APA
- Cenevska, I. (2015). Euratom as the “outsider whitin”: the specificity of the European Atomic Energy Community examined in the light of the health and safety and the safeguards regimes. Ghent University. Faculty of Law, Ghent, Belgium.
- Chicago author-date
- Cenevska, Ilina. 2015. “Euratom as the ‘Outsider Whitin’: The Specificity of the European Atomic Energy Community Examined in the Light of the Health and Safety and the Safeguards Regimes.” Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. Faculty of Law.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Cenevska, Ilina. 2015. “Euratom as the ‘Outsider Whitin’: The Specificity of the European Atomic Energy Community Examined in the Light of the Health and Safety and the Safeguards Regimes.” Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. Faculty of Law.
- Vancouver
- 1.Cenevska I. Euratom as the “outsider whitin”: the specificity of the European Atomic Energy Community examined in the light of the health and safety and the safeguards regimes. [Ghent, Belgium]: Ghent University. Faculty of Law; 2015.
- IEEE
- [1]I. Cenevska, “Euratom as the ‘outsider whitin’: the specificity of the European Atomic Energy Community examined in the light of the health and safety and the safeguards regimes,” Ghent University. Faculty of Law, Ghent, Belgium, 2015.
@phdthesis{7208075,
abstract = {{The thesis focuses on the radiation protection and nuclear safety (health and safety) and the nuclear safeguards regimes devised under the Euratom Treaty and the Euratom secondary legislation. The fields of nuclear safeguards, on the one hand, and radiation protection and nuclear safety, on the other, are arguably the two most prominent fields covered by the Euratom Treaty that can be credited for the remarkable endurance of the Euratom project to the present day and are, ultimately, the two fields where the specificity of the Euratom Community predominantly lies. The thesis explores the following research questions: How do the Euratom safeguards and health and safety regimes interact with the Union’s environmental policy and the Union’s non-proliferation policy as their respective proxies developed under the Union framework stricto sensu (i.e. the framework created under the Union Treaties)? What are the inconsistencies or lacunae underlying this interaction? Do the two Euratom-devised regimes and the corresponding Union policies they most commonly interact with and are most immediately linked to in terms of their respective subject matter fully complement each other or are there any problematic issues or issues of conflict that characterise their relationship? Are such differences reconcilable and surmountable, and in what way?}},
author = {{Cenevska, Ilina}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{313}},
publisher = {{Ghent University. Faculty of Law}},
school = {{Ghent University}},
title = {{Euratom as the 'outsider whitin': the specificity of the European Atomic Energy Community examined in the light of the health and safety and the safeguards regimes}},
year = {{2015}},
}