Advanced search
1 file | 565.33 KB Add to list

Whoever has the stick guides the Buffalo': neutrality, party politics and authority formation in community mediation in the central and West Terai, Nepal

Author
Organization
Abstract
This article examines the relationship between the concept of neutrality in community mediation and partisan party politics in Nepal. Focusing on one donor-sponsored, US model-based community mediation programme in the Terai, this article contributes to a growing literature on authority formation and the role of party politicians in post-conflict Nepal. It argues that both neutrality and bias in dispute settlement are constitutive of building (Weberian) authority, allowing for the legitimate exercise of power by politicians. Neutrality is not only highly valued in mediation ideology, but is also a crucial legitimizing register in dispute settlement in Nepal. Although resolving disputes neutrally enhances the local legitimacy of (political) mediators, our research finds that there are cases when showing political favouritism also helps maintain power. We find that these contradictory incentives and the need to balance them guide the arena in which politicians choose to resolve disputes and how they choose to resolve them. These strategic decisions made by politicians in order to balance neutrality and bias thus guide outcomes of dispute settlement, and mediation in particular. This raises questions about the proclaimed ability of community mediation to overcome power imbalances and provide justice to disadvantaged communities.
Keywords
DELUSIONS, CONFLICT-MANAGEMENT, CONSENSUS, ILLUSIONS, ELSEWHERE, CRITIQUE, AFRICA, POWER, mediation, party-politics, neutrality, post-conflict, Nepal

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 565.33 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Suykens, Bert, and Danielle Stein. “Whoever Has the Stick Guides the Buffalo’: Neutrality, Party Politics and Authority Formation in Community Mediation in the Central and West Terai, Nepal.” JOURNAL OF SOUTH ASIAN DEVELOPMENT 11.1 (2016): 88–112. Print.
APA
Suykens, Bert, & Stein, D. (2016). Whoever has the stick guides the Buffalo’: neutrality, party politics and authority formation in community mediation in the central and West Terai, Nepal. JOURNAL OF SOUTH ASIAN DEVELOPMENT, 11(1), 88–112.
Chicago author-date
Suykens, Bert, and Danielle Stein. 2016. “Whoever Has the Stick Guides the Buffalo’: Neutrality, Party Politics and Authority Formation in Community Mediation in the Central and West Terai, Nepal.” Journal of South Asian Development 11 (1): 88–112.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Suykens, Bert, and Danielle Stein. 2016. “Whoever Has the Stick Guides the Buffalo’: Neutrality, Party Politics and Authority Formation in Community Mediation in the Central and West Terai, Nepal.” Journal of South Asian Development 11 (1): 88–112.
Vancouver
1.
Suykens B, Stein D. Whoever has the stick guides the Buffalo’: neutrality, party politics and authority formation in community mediation in the central and West Terai, Nepal. JOURNAL OF SOUTH ASIAN DEVELOPMENT. 2016;11(1):88–112.
IEEE
[1]
B. Suykens and D. Stein, “Whoever has the stick guides the Buffalo’: neutrality, party politics and authority formation in community mediation in the central and West Terai, Nepal,” JOURNAL OF SOUTH ASIAN DEVELOPMENT, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 88–112, 2016.
@article{7180381,
  abstract     = {This article examines the relationship between the concept of neutrality in community mediation and partisan party politics in Nepal. Focusing on one donor-sponsored, US model-based community mediation programme in the Terai, this article contributes to a growing literature on authority formation and the role of party politicians in post-conflict Nepal. It argues that both neutrality and bias in dispute settlement are constitutive of building (Weberian) authority, allowing for the legitimate exercise of power by politicians. Neutrality is not only highly valued in mediation ideology, but is also a crucial legitimizing register in dispute settlement in Nepal. Although resolving disputes neutrally enhances the local legitimacy of (political) mediators, our research finds that there are cases when showing political favouritism also helps maintain power. We find that these contradictory incentives and the need to balance them guide the arena in which politicians choose to resolve disputes and how they choose to resolve them. These strategic decisions made by politicians in order to balance neutrality and bias thus guide outcomes of dispute settlement, and mediation in particular. This raises questions about the proclaimed ability of community mediation to overcome power imbalances and provide justice to disadvantaged communities.},
  author       = {Suykens, Bert and Stein, Danielle},
  issn         = {0973-1741},
  journal      = {JOURNAL OF SOUTH ASIAN DEVELOPMENT},
  keywords     = {DELUSIONS,CONFLICT-MANAGEMENT,CONSENSUS,ILLUSIONS,ELSEWHERE,CRITIQUE,AFRICA,POWER,mediation,party-politics,neutrality,post-conflict,Nepal},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {88--112},
  title        = {Whoever has the stick guides the Buffalo': neutrality, party politics and authority formation in community mediation in the central and West Terai, Nepal},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0973174116629252},
  volume       = {11},
  year         = {2016},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: