A combined morphometric and AFLP based diversity study challenges the taxonomy of the European members of the complex Prunus L. section Prunus
- Author
- Leander Depypere (UGent) , Peter Chaerle (UGent) , Peter Breyne (UGent) , Kristine Vander Mijnsbrugge (UGent) and Paul Goetghebeur (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Multivariate analysis of both endocarp and leaf morphometrics is combined with cluster analysis and Bayesian inference of AFLP markers to assess the morphologic and genetic variation of five European members of Prunus section Prunus (P. cerasifera, P. domestica, P. insititia, P. spinosa, and P. x fruticans). Endocarp morphometrics separate most Prunus taxa studied, but overlap remains between P. domestica and P. cerasifera, and P. spinosa and P. x fruticans. Leaf morphometrics yield better separation of P. domestica and P. cerasifera, but do not allow distinction between P. spinosa and P. x fruticans. Both cluster analysis and PCoA of AFLP markers equally produce three distinct clusters. A first consists of all P. cerasifera samples and the sole P. cocomilia; a second cluster includes all individuals of P. domestica and P. insititia; and a third group comprises all P. spinosa and P. x fruticans samples.
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 478.81 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-715795
- MLA
- Depypere, Leander, et al. “A Combined Morphometric and AFLP Based Diversity Study Challenges the Taxonomy of the European Members of the Complex Prunus L. Section Prunus.” Plant Systematics and Evolution, vol. 279, no. 1–4, 2009, pp. 219–31, doi:10.1007/s00606-009-0158-8.
- APA
- Depypere, L., Chaerle, P., Breyne, P., Vander Mijnsbrugge, K., & Goetghebeur, P. (2009). A combined morphometric and AFLP based diversity study challenges the taxonomy of the European members of the complex Prunus L. section Prunus. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 279(1–4), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0158-8
- Chicago author-date
- Depypere, Leander, Peter Chaerle, Peter Breyne, Kristine Vander Mijnsbrugge, and Paul Goetghebeur. 2009. “A Combined Morphometric and AFLP Based Diversity Study Challenges the Taxonomy of the European Members of the Complex Prunus L. Section Prunus.” Plant Systematics and Evolution 279 (1–4): 219–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0158-8.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Depypere, Leander, Peter Chaerle, Peter Breyne, Kristine Vander Mijnsbrugge, and Paul Goetghebeur. 2009. “A Combined Morphometric and AFLP Based Diversity Study Challenges the Taxonomy of the European Members of the Complex Prunus L. Section Prunus.” Plant Systematics and Evolution 279 (1–4): 219–231. doi:10.1007/s00606-009-0158-8.
- Vancouver
- 1.Depypere L, Chaerle P, Breyne P, Vander Mijnsbrugge K, Goetghebeur P. A combined morphometric and AFLP based diversity study challenges the taxonomy of the European members of the complex Prunus L. section Prunus. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2009;279(1–4):219–31.
- IEEE
- [1]L. Depypere, P. Chaerle, P. Breyne, K. Vander Mijnsbrugge, and P. Goetghebeur, “A combined morphometric and AFLP based diversity study challenges the taxonomy of the European members of the complex Prunus L. section Prunus,” Plant Systematics and Evolution, vol. 279, no. 1–4, pp. 219–231, 2009.
@article{715795,
abstract = {{Multivariate analysis of both endocarp and leaf morphometrics is combined with cluster analysis and Bayesian inference of AFLP markers to assess the morphologic and genetic variation of five European members of Prunus section Prunus (P. cerasifera, P. domestica, P. insititia, P. spinosa, and P. x fruticans). Endocarp morphometrics separate most Prunus taxa studied, but overlap remains between P. domestica and P. cerasifera, and P. spinosa and P. x fruticans. Leaf morphometrics yield better separation of P. domestica and P. cerasifera, but do not allow distinction between P. spinosa and P. x fruticans. Both cluster analysis and PCoA of AFLP markers equally produce three distinct clusters. A first consists of all P. cerasifera samples and the sole P. cocomilia; a second cluster includes all individuals of P. domestica and P. insititia; and a third group comprises all P. spinosa and P. x fruticans samples.}},
author = {{Depypere, Leander and Chaerle, Peter and Breyne, Peter and Vander Mijnsbrugge, Kristine and Goetghebeur, Paul}},
issn = {{0378-2697}},
journal = {{Plant Systematics and Evolution}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1-4}},
pages = {{219--231}},
title = {{A combined morphometric and AFLP based diversity study challenges the taxonomy of the European members of the complex Prunus L. section Prunus}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0158-8}},
volume = {{279}},
year = {{2009}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: