Advanced search
Add to list

Deciding how to decide on agri-environmental schemes : the political economy of subsidiarity, decentralisation and participation in the European Union

Author
Organization
Abstract
Since 1992 the provision of agri-environmental schemes (AESs) has been obligatory for member states of the European Union. However, decisions concerning the actual design of schemes and measures are left to member states who have to integrate this policy within their administrative structures and to comply with the general rules laid down in the EU rural development regulations. Over time, the respective council regulations have increasingly encouraged member states to design agri-environmental policy in a sub-national, decentralised and participatory way. However, the response to these opportunities has been quite diverse amongst the member states. This paper presents the results of a unique expert survey in nine different member states, focusing on decentralisation and participation. The results show that the way in which decisions are made affects the environmental effectiveness of AES. In particular, the involvement of actors at a local level and the participation of environmental NGOs have a positive effect on the environmental effectiveness of AES. Therefore, it is not surprising that most actors involved in decision making surrounding AESs are in favour of further decentralisation and participation in order to tackle agri-environmental problems. However, actors from the agricultural administration and agricultural associations, which are the most influential groups in terms of the design of AESs, oppose extending participation to the local level and to environmental associations.
Keywords
public transaction costs, agri-environmental policy, political economy, EU member states, European Union, interest groups, levels of decision, decentralisation, participation

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Beckmann, Volker, Jörg Eggers, and Evy Mettepenningen. “Deciding How to Decide on Agri-environmental Schemes : the Political Economy of Subsidiarity, Decentralisation and Participation in the European Union.” JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 52.5 (2009): 689–716. Print.
APA
Beckmann, V., Eggers, J., & Mettepenningen, E. (2009). Deciding how to decide on agri-environmental schemes : the political economy of subsidiarity, decentralisation and participation in the European Union. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 52(5), 689–716.
Chicago author-date
Beckmann, Volker, Jörg Eggers, and Evy Mettepenningen. 2009. “Deciding How to Decide on Agri-environmental Schemes : the Political Economy of Subsidiarity, Decentralisation and Participation in the European Union.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52 (5): 689–716.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Beckmann, Volker, Jörg Eggers, and Evy Mettepenningen. 2009. “Deciding How to Decide on Agri-environmental Schemes : the Political Economy of Subsidiarity, Decentralisation and Participation in the European Union.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52 (5): 689–716.
Vancouver
1.
Beckmann V, Eggers J, Mettepenningen E. Deciding how to decide on agri-environmental schemes : the political economy of subsidiarity, decentralisation and participation in the European Union. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT. 2009;52(5):689–716.
IEEE
[1]
V. Beckmann, J. Eggers, and E. Mettepenningen, “Deciding how to decide on agri-environmental schemes : the political economy of subsidiarity, decentralisation and participation in the European Union,” JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 689–716, 2009.
@article{714281,
  abstract     = {Since 1992 the provision of agri-environmental schemes (AESs) has been obligatory for member states of the European Union. However, decisions concerning the actual design of schemes and measures are left to member states who have to integrate this policy within their administrative structures and to comply with the general rules laid down in the EU rural development regulations. Over time, the respective council regulations have increasingly encouraged member states to design agri-environmental policy in a sub-national, decentralised and participatory way. However, the response to these opportunities has been quite diverse amongst the member states. This paper presents the results of a unique expert survey in nine different member states, focusing on decentralisation and participation. The results show that the way in which decisions are made affects the environmental effectiveness of AES. In particular, the involvement of actors at a local level and the participation of environmental NGOs have a positive effect on the environmental effectiveness of AES. Therefore, it is not surprising that most actors involved in decision making surrounding AESs are in favour of further decentralisation and participation in order to tackle agri-environmental problems. However, actors from the agricultural administration and agricultural associations, which are the most influential groups in terms of the design of AESs, oppose extending participation to the local level and to environmental associations.},
  author       = {Beckmann, Volker and Eggers, Jörg and Mettepenningen, Evy},
  issn         = {0964-0568},
  journal      = {JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT},
  keywords     = {public transaction costs,agri-environmental policy,political economy,EU member states,European Union,interest groups,levels of decision,decentralisation,participation},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {5},
  pages        = {689--716},
  title        = {Deciding how to decide on agri-environmental schemes : the political economy of subsidiarity, decentralisation and participation in the European Union},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640560902958289},
  volume       = {52},
  year         = {2009},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: