Advanced search
1 file | 323.13 KB Add to list

Developmental screening in South Africa : comparing the national developmental checklist to a standardized tool

(2015) AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES. 15(1). p.188-196
Author
Organization
Abstract
Background: Worldwide, more than 200 million children in low- and middle-income countries have developmental delays and/or disabilities. In South Africa the only nationally implemented developmental 'screening' tool is integrated as part of 'The Road to Health Booklet (RTHB). Method: The study employed a comparative cross-sectional within-subject design to evaluate the accuracy of the RTHB developmental checklist against a standardized international tool i.e. the PEDS tools, consisting of the PEDS and PEDS: DM. A total of 201 participants were included through convenience sampling at primary health care facilities in Tshwane, South Africa. Results: Sensitivity of the RTHB developmental checklist is low, but specificity is high. The RTHB developmental checklist failed to identify more than half the infants at risk of delays or disorders. The nationally implemented developmental checklist is ineffective to identify at-risk infants. It should be adapted and validated or replaced in order to improve identification of at-risk infants.
Keywords
early identification, developmental screening, developmental delays or disorders, at-risk infants, PRIMARY-CARE, CHILDREN, DENVER

Downloads

  • Afr Health Sci 2015 van der Linde.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 323.13 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
van der Linde, Jeannie et al. “Developmental Screening in South Africa : Comparing the National Developmental Checklist to a Standardized Tool.” AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES 15.1 (2015): 188–196. Print.
APA
van der Linde, J., Swanepoel, D. W., Glascoe, F. P., Louw, E., & Vinck, B. (2015). Developmental screening in South Africa : comparing the national developmental checklist to a standardized tool. AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 15(1), 188–196.
Chicago author-date
van der Linde, Jeannie, De Wet Swanepoel, Frances Page Glascoe, EM Louw, and Bart Vinck. 2015. “Developmental Screening in South Africa : Comparing the National Developmental Checklist to a Standardized Tool.” African Health Sciences 15 (1): 188–196.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
van der Linde, Jeannie, De Wet Swanepoel, Frances Page Glascoe, EM Louw, and Bart Vinck. 2015. “Developmental Screening in South Africa : Comparing the National Developmental Checklist to a Standardized Tool.” African Health Sciences 15 (1): 188–196.
Vancouver
1.
van der Linde J, Swanepoel DW, Glascoe FP, Louw E, Vinck B. Developmental screening in South Africa : comparing the national developmental checklist to a standardized tool. AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES. 2015;15(1):188–96.
IEEE
[1]
J. van der Linde, D. W. Swanepoel, F. P. Glascoe, E. Louw, and B. Vinck, “Developmental screening in South Africa : comparing the national developmental checklist to a standardized tool,” AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 188–196, 2015.
@article{7142348,
  abstract     = {{Background: Worldwide, more than 200 million children in low- and middle-income countries have developmental delays and/or disabilities. In South Africa the only nationally implemented developmental 'screening' tool is integrated as part of 'The Road to Health Booklet (RTHB). 
Method: The study employed a comparative cross-sectional within-subject design to evaluate the accuracy of the RTHB developmental checklist against a standardized international tool i.e. the PEDS tools, consisting of the PEDS and PEDS: DM. A total of 201 participants were included through convenience sampling at primary health care facilities in Tshwane, South Africa. 
Results: Sensitivity of the RTHB developmental checklist is low, but specificity is high. The RTHB developmental checklist failed to identify more than half the infants at risk of delays or disorders. The nationally implemented developmental checklist is ineffective to identify at-risk infants. It should be adapted and validated or replaced in order to improve identification of at-risk infants.}},
  author       = {{van der Linde, Jeannie and Swanepoel, De Wet and Glascoe, Frances Page and Louw, EM and Vinck, Bart}},
  issn         = {{1680-6905}},
  journal      = {{AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES}},
  keywords     = {{early identification,developmental screening,developmental delays or disorders,at-risk infants,PRIMARY-CARE,CHILDREN,DENVER}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{188--196}},
  title        = {{Developmental screening in South Africa : comparing the national developmental checklist to a standardized tool}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v15i1.25}},
  volume       = {{15}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: