Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Setup accuracy for prone and supine whole breast irradiation

THOMAS MULLIEZ, AKOS GULYBAN UGent, TOM VERCAUTEREN, ANNICK VAN GREVELING, Bruno Speleers UGent, Wilfried De Neve UGent and Liv Veldeman UGent (2016) STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE. 192(4). p.254-259
abstract
Purpose: To evaluate cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) based setup accuracy and margins for prone and supine whole breast irradiation (WBI). Methods: Setup accuracy was evaluated on 3559 CBCT scans of 242 patients treated with WBI and uncertainty margins were calculated using the van Herk formula. Uni- and multivariate analysis on individual margins was performed for age, body mass index (BMI) and cup size. Results: The population-based margin in vertical (VE), lateral (LA) and longitudinal (LO) directions was 10.4/9.4/9.4 mm for the 103 supine and 10.5/22.4/13.7 mm for the 139 prone treated patients, being significantly (p < 0.01) different for the LA and LO directions. Multivariate analysis identified a significant (p < 0.05) correlation between BMI and the LO margin in supine position and the VE/LA margin in prone position. Conclusion: In this series, setup accuracy is significantly worse in prone compared to supine position for the LA and LO directions. However, without proper image-guidance, uncertainty margins of about 1 cm are also necessary for supine WBI. For patients with a higher BMI, larger margins are required.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
CAVITY, CLIPS, GUIDANCE, POSITION, Supine position, Breast radiotherapy, Prone position, Setup accuracy, Cone-beam computed tomography, BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY, CORRECTION PROTOCOL, PRECISION, CANCER PATIENTS, IMRT
journal title
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
Strahlenther. Onkol.
volume
192
issue
4
pages
254 - 259
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000374382200008
JCR category
RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
JCR impact factor
2.735 (2016)
JCR rank
35/126 (2016)
JCR quartile
2 (2016)
ISSN
0179-7158
DOI
10.1007/s00066-016-0943-6
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
7137567
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-7137567
date created
2016-03-07 13:25:01
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:42:08
@article{7137567,
  abstract     = {Purpose: To evaluate cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) based setup accuracy and margins for prone and supine whole breast irradiation (WBI). 
Methods: Setup accuracy was evaluated on 3559 CBCT scans of 242 patients treated with WBI and uncertainty margins were calculated using the van Herk formula. Uni- and multivariate analysis on individual margins was performed for age, body mass index (BMI) and cup size. 
Results: The population-based margin in vertical (VE), lateral (LA) and longitudinal (LO) directions was 10.4/9.4/9.4 mm for the 103 supine and 10.5/22.4/13.7 mm for the 139 prone treated patients, being significantly (p {\textlangle} 0.01) different for the LA and LO directions. Multivariate analysis identified a significant (p {\textlangle} 0.05) correlation between BMI and the LO margin in supine position and the VE/LA margin in prone position. 
Conclusion: In this series, setup accuracy is significantly worse in prone compared to supine position for the LA and LO directions. However, without proper image-guidance, uncertainty margins of about 1 cm are also necessary for supine WBI. For patients with a higher BMI, larger margins are required.},
  author       = {MULLIEZ, THOMAS and GULYBAN, AKOS and VERCAUTEREN, TOM and VAN GREVELING, ANNICK and Speleers, Bruno and De Neve, Wilfried and Veldeman, Liv},
  issn         = {0179-7158},
  journal      = {STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE},
  keyword      = {CAVITY,CLIPS,GUIDANCE,POSITION,Supine position,Breast radiotherapy,Prone position,Setup accuracy,Cone-beam computed tomography,BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY,IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY,CORRECTION PROTOCOL,PRECISION,CANCER PATIENTS,IMRT},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {254--259},
  title        = {Setup accuracy for prone and supine whole breast irradiation},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-016-0943-6},
  volume       = {192},
  year         = {2016},
}

Chicago
MULLIEZ, THOMAS, AKOS GULYBAN, TOM VERCAUTEREN, ANNICK VAN GREVELING, Bruno Speleers, Wilfried De Neve, and Liv Veldeman. 2016. “Setup Accuracy for Prone and Supine Whole Breast Irradiation.” Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie 192 (4): 254–259.
APA
MULLIEZ, T., GULYBAN, A., VERCAUTEREN, T., VAN GREVELING, A., Speleers, B., De Neve, W., & Veldeman, L. (2016). Setup accuracy for prone and supine whole breast irradiation. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 192(4), 254–259.
Vancouver
1.
MULLIEZ T, GULYBAN A, VERCAUTEREN T, VAN GREVELING A, Speleers B, De Neve W, et al. Setup accuracy for prone and supine whole breast irradiation. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE. 2016;192(4):254–9.
MLA
MULLIEZ, THOMAS, AKOS GULYBAN, TOM VERCAUTEREN, et al. “Setup Accuracy for Prone and Supine Whole Breast Irradiation.” STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE 192.4 (2016): 254–259. Print.