Advanced search
1 file | 484.98 KB Add to list

What is (good) practitioner research?

(2016) VOCATIONS AND LEARNING. 9(1). p.1-19
Author
Organization
Abstract
This special issue recognizes EAPRIL as being a platform for practitioner and practice-based research and by organizing the 10th annual conference for practitioner research on improving learning in education and professional practice. Papers in this conference and in this special issue are rooted in practice-based research or practitioner research. They reflect the popularity of practitioner research in vocational teacher education and in universities of applied sciences. Reason enough for the authors of the current paper to reflect on the question: "What is practitioner research?" And, more importantly what makes good practitioner research? Reviews show that people use broad interpretations of the concept, which requires that to clarify the epistemological basis of the relation between research and practice the reflections goes back to Aristotle philosophy. The latter, aiming at discovering what kind of knowledge is obtained, what purpose it serve, and how it differs. This yields a theoretical, and two practical kinds of knowledge. Although all three are relevant, the so called 'practitioner knowledge' (the prhonesis and the techne), need more attention in judging the 'goodness' of practitioner research. Five principles of validation are mentioned, e.g. the process of meaning making and negotiation, differing from the correspondence between knowledge and the outside world, e.g. validity. These principles provide a possible angle and sometimes researcher follow them implicitly and unconsciously. The articles in this special issue reflects the realisation of many of these principles within the individual studies. The current paper does not intent to give final answers, but rather to trigger a further conversation on the fundamental question of: What is good practitioner research?
Keywords
Practice based research, Practitioner research, Theoria, Techne, Phronesis, Praxis, Validation principles, Validity, Reliability, EDUCATIONAL-RESEARCH, 5 PRINCIPLES, INQUIRY, GAP

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 484.98 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Heikkinen, Hannu L. T., et al. “What Is (Good) Practitioner Research?” VOCATIONS AND LEARNING, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1–19, doi:10.1007/s12186-016-9153-8.
APA
Heikkinen, H. L. T., de Jong, F., & Vanderlinde, R. (2016). What is (good) practitioner research? VOCATIONS AND LEARNING, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9153-8
Chicago author-date
Heikkinen, Hannu L.T., Frank de Jong, and Ruben Vanderlinde. 2016. “What Is (Good) Practitioner Research?” VOCATIONS AND LEARNING 9 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9153-8.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Heikkinen, Hannu L.T., Frank de Jong, and Ruben Vanderlinde. 2016. “What Is (Good) Practitioner Research?” VOCATIONS AND LEARNING 9 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1007/s12186-016-9153-8.
Vancouver
1.
Heikkinen HLT, de Jong F, Vanderlinde R. What is (good) practitioner research? VOCATIONS AND LEARNING. 2016;9(1):1–19.
IEEE
[1]
H. L. T. Heikkinen, F. de Jong, and R. Vanderlinde, “What is (good) practitioner research?,” VOCATIONS AND LEARNING, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2016.
@article{7105224,
  abstract     = {{This special issue recognizes EAPRIL as being a platform for practitioner and practice-based research and by organizing the 10th annual conference for practitioner research on improving learning in education and professional practice. Papers in this conference and in this special issue are rooted in practice-based research or practitioner research. They reflect the popularity of practitioner research in vocational teacher education and in universities of applied sciences. Reason enough for the authors of the current paper to reflect on the question: "What is practitioner research?" And, more importantly what makes good practitioner research? Reviews show that people use broad interpretations of the concept, which requires that to clarify the epistemological basis of the relation between research and practice the reflections goes back to Aristotle philosophy. The latter, aiming at discovering what kind of knowledge is obtained, what purpose it serve, and how it differs. This yields a theoretical, and two practical kinds of knowledge. Although all three are relevant, the so called 'practitioner knowledge' (the prhonesis and the techne), need more attention in judging the 'goodness' of practitioner research. Five principles of validation are mentioned, e.g. the process of meaning making and negotiation, differing from the correspondence between knowledge and the outside world, e.g. validity. These principles provide a possible angle and sometimes researcher follow them implicitly and unconsciously. The articles in this special issue reflects the realisation of many of these principles within the individual studies. The current paper does not intent to give final answers, but rather to trigger a further conversation on the fundamental question of: What is good practitioner research?}},
  author       = {{Heikkinen, Hannu L.T. and de Jong, Frank and Vanderlinde, Ruben}},
  issn         = {{1874-785X}},
  journal      = {{VOCATIONS AND LEARNING}},
  keywords     = {{Practice based research,Practitioner research,Theoria,Techne,Phronesis,Praxis,Validation principles,Validity,Reliability,EDUCATIONAL-RESEARCH,5 PRINCIPLES,INQUIRY,GAP}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{1--19}},
  title        = {{What is (good) practitioner research?}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9153-8}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: