Advanced search
1 file | 330.79 KB Add to list

Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations

Peter Vermeir (UGent) , Dominique Vandijck (UGent) , Sophie Degroote (UGent) , Renaat Peleman (UGent) , Rik Verhaeghe (UGent) , Eric Mortier (UGent) , Sabine Van daele (UGent) , Walter Buylaert (UGent) and Dirk Vogelaers (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
aims: Effective and efficient communication is crucial in healthcare. Written communication remains the most prevalent form of communication between specialized and primary care. We aimed at reviewing the literature on the quality of written communication, the impact of communication inefficiencies and recommendations to improve written communication in healthcare. Design: Narrative literature review. Methods:A search was carried out on the databases PubMed, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library by means of the (MeSH)terms ‘communication’, ‘primary health care’, ‘correspondence’, ‘patient safety’, ‘patient handoff’ and ‘continuity of patient care’. Reviewers screened 4609 records and 462 full texts were checked according following inclusion criteria: (1) publication between January 1985 and March 2014, (2) availability as full text in English, (3) categorization as original research, reviews, meta-analyses or letters to the editor. Results:A total of 69 articles were included in this review. It was found that poor communication can lead to various negative outcomes: discontinuity of care, compromise of patient safety, patient dissatisfaction and inefficient use of valuable resources, both in unnecessary investigations and physician worktime as well as economic consequences. Conclusions: There is room for improvement of both content and timeliness of written communication. The delineation of ownership of the communication process should be clear. Peer review, process indicators and follow-up tools are required to measure the impact of quality improvement initiatives. Communication between caregivers should feature more prominently in graduate and postgraduate training, to become engraved as an essential skill and quality characteristic of each caregiver.
Keywords
patient safety, correspondence, patient handoff, communication, continuity of patient care, primary health care

Downloads

  • ResearchDay2016.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 330.79 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Vermeir, Peter et al. “Communication in Healthcare: a Narrative Review of the Literature and Practical Recommendations.” Research Day Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abstracts. 2016. Print.
APA
Vermeir, Peter, Vandijck, D., Degroote, S., Peleman, R., Verhaeghe, R., Mortier, E., Van daeleSabine, et al. (2016). Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations. Research day Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abstracts. Presented at the Research day Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
Chicago author-date
Vermeir, Peter, Dominique Vandijck, Sophie Degroote, Renaat Peleman, Rik Verhaeghe, Eric Mortier, Van daeleSabine, Walter Buylaert, and Dirk Vogelaers. 2016. “Communication in Healthcare: a Narrative Review of the Literature and Practical Recommendations.” In Research Day Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abstracts.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Vermeir, Peter, Dominique Vandijck, Sophie Degroote, Renaat Peleman, Rik Verhaeghe, Eric Mortier, Van daeleSabine, Walter Buylaert, and Dirk Vogelaers. 2016. “Communication in Healthcare: a Narrative Review of the Literature and Practical Recommendations.” In Research Day Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abstracts.
Vancouver
1.
Vermeir P, Vandijck D, Degroote S, Peleman R, Verhaeghe R, Mortier E, et al. Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations. Research day Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abstracts. 2016.
IEEE
[1]
P. Vermeir et al., “Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations,” in Research day Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abstracts, Ghent, Belgium, 2016.
@inproceedings{7095943,
  abstract     = {aims: Effective and efficient communication is crucial in healthcare. Written communication remains the most prevalent form of communication between specialized and primary care. We aimed at reviewing the literature on the quality of written communication, the impact of communication inefficiencies and recommendations to improve written communication in healthcare. 
Design: Narrative literature review. 
Methods:A search was carried out on the databases PubMed, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library by means of the (MeSH)terms ‘communication’, ‘primary health care’, ‘correspondence’, ‘patient safety’, ‘patient handoff’ and ‘continuity of patient care’. Reviewers screened 4609 records and 462 full texts were checked according following inclusion criteria: (1) publication between January 1985 and March 2014, (2) availability as full text in English, (3) categorization as original research, reviews, meta-analyses or letters to the editor. 
Results:A total of 69 articles were included in this review. It was found that poor communication can lead to various negative outcomes: discontinuity of care, compromise of patient safety, patient dissatisfaction and inefficient use of valuable resources, both in unnecessary investigations and physician worktime as well as economic consequences. 
Conclusions: There is room for improvement of both content and timeliness of written communication. The delineation of ownership of the communication process should be clear. Peer review, process indicators and follow-up tools are required to measure the impact of quality improvement initiatives. Communication between caregivers should feature more prominently in graduate and postgraduate training, to become engraved as an essential skill and quality characteristic of each caregiver.},
  author       = {Vermeir, Peter and Vandijck, Dominique and Degroote, Sophie and Peleman, Renaat and Verhaeghe, Rik and Mortier, Eric and Van daele, Sabine and Buylaert, Walter and Vogelaers, Dirk},
  booktitle    = {Research day Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abstracts},
  keywords     = {patient safety,correspondence,patient handoff,communication,continuity of patient care,primary health care},
  language     = {eng},
  location     = {Ghent, Belgium},
  title        = {Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations},
  year         = {2016},
}