Advanced search
1 file | 4.03 MB Add to list

Examining variation in the expression of tense/aspect to classify the Kikongo Language Cluster

Sebastian Dom (UGent) and Koen Bostoen (UGent)
(2015) AFRICANA LINGUISTICA. 21. p.163-211
Author
Organization
Project
  • KONGOKING (Political centralization, economic integration and language evolution in Central Africa: An interdisciplinary approach to the early history of the Kongo kingdom)
Abstract
In this article we examine variation in the expression of tense and aspect (TA) in 23 modern and two historical Bantu language varieties belonging to Guthrie’s B40, H10 and H30 groups in order to shed light on the internal classification of the Kikongo Language Cluster (KLC). We apply the Comparative Method to this specific set of morphological data to test a recent phylogenetic classification of the KLC. We identify eight widespread TA markers as shared retentions dating back to the period before the internal fragmentation of the KLC. Six of these are inherited from Proto‑Bantu. Two other markers go back to Proto‑Kikongoid and Proto‑Kikongo. They confirm that the KLC constitutes a discrete clade within West‑Coastal Bantu. We furthermore distinguish fourteen shared innovations that took place after the break‑up of the last common ancestor of the KLC. These innovations provide corroborating evidence for three phylogenetic subgroups within the KLC, namely East, South and West, and for the fact that the latter subgroup falls apart in two discrete genealogical subunits. They furthermore testify to the horizontal transmission of TA features between subgroups. Such language convergence often correlates with relatively recent historical developments within the Lower Congo region and contributed to the multilayered constitution of the KLC.
Keywords
PREDICATION FOCUS, tense/aspect, Kikongo Language Cluster, language contact, Comparative Method, language classification, SEMANTICS, BANTU, PRAGMATICS

Downloads

  • 2015 Dom Bostoen Examining variation in the expression of TA to classify the Kikongo language cluster.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 4.03 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Dom, Sebastian, and Koen Bostoen. “Examining Variation in the Expression of Tense/Aspect to Classify the Kikongo Language Cluster.” AFRICANA LINGUISTICA, vol. 21, 2015, pp. 163–211, doi:10.2143/AL.21.0.3122580.
APA
Dom, S., & Bostoen, K. (2015). Examining variation in the expression of tense/aspect to classify the Kikongo Language Cluster. AFRICANA LINGUISTICA, 21, 163–211. https://doi.org/10.2143/AL.21.0.3122580
Chicago author-date
Dom, Sebastian, and Koen Bostoen. 2015. “Examining Variation in the Expression of Tense/Aspect to Classify the Kikongo Language Cluster.” AFRICANA LINGUISTICA 21: 163–211. https://doi.org/10.2143/AL.21.0.3122580.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Dom, Sebastian, and Koen Bostoen. 2015. “Examining Variation in the Expression of Tense/Aspect to Classify the Kikongo Language Cluster.” AFRICANA LINGUISTICA 21: 163–211. doi:10.2143/AL.21.0.3122580.
Vancouver
1.
Dom S, Bostoen K. Examining variation in the expression of tense/aspect to classify the Kikongo Language Cluster. AFRICANA LINGUISTICA. 2015;21:163–211.
IEEE
[1]
S. Dom and K. Bostoen, “Examining variation in the expression of tense/aspect to classify the Kikongo Language Cluster,” AFRICANA LINGUISTICA, vol. 21, pp. 163–211, 2015.
@article{7030176,
  abstract     = {{In this article we examine variation in the expression of tense and aspect (TA) in 23 modern and two historical Bantu language varieties belonging to Guthrie’s B40, H10 and H30 groups in order to shed light on the internal classification of the Kikongo Language Cluster (KLC). We apply the Comparative Method to this specific set of morphological data to test a recent phylogenetic classification of the KLC. We identify eight widespread TA markers as shared retentions dating back to the period before the internal fragmentation of the KLC. Six of these are inherited from Proto‑Bantu. Two other markers go back to Proto‑Kikongoid and Proto‑Kikongo. They confirm that the KLC constitutes a discrete clade within West‑Coastal Bantu. We furthermore distinguish fourteen shared innovations that took place after the break‑up of the last common ancestor of the KLC. These innovations provide corroborating evidence for three phylogenetic subgroups within the KLC, namely East, South and West, and for the fact that the latter subgroup falls apart in two discrete genealogical subunits. They furthermore testify to the horizontal transmission of TA features between subgroups. Such language convergence often correlates with relatively recent historical developments within the Lower Congo region and contributed to the multilayered constitution of the KLC.}},
  author       = {{Dom, Sebastian and Bostoen, Koen}},
  issn         = {{0065-4124}},
  journal      = {{AFRICANA LINGUISTICA}},
  keywords     = {{PREDICATION FOCUS,tense/aspect,Kikongo Language Cluster,language contact,Comparative Method,language classification,SEMANTICS,BANTU,PRAGMATICS}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{163--211}},
  title        = {{Examining variation in the expression of tense/aspect to classify the Kikongo Language Cluster}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.2143/AL.21.0.3122580}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: