Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Necessity and feasibility of 3D simulations of steam cracking reactors

Pieter Reyniers UGent, Carl Schietekat, David Van Cauwenberge UGent, Laurien Vandewalle UGent, Kevin Van Geem UGent and Guy Marin UGent (2015) INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH. 54(49). p.12270-12282
abstract
Using detailed kinetic models in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations is extremely challenging because of the large number of species that need to be considered and the stiffness of the associated set of differential equations. The high computational cost associated with using a detail-ea kinetic network in CFD simulations is why one-dimensional simulations are still used, although this leads to substantial differences compared to reference three-dimensional simulations. Therefore, a methodology was developed that,allows one to use, detailed single-event microkinetic Models in CFD simulations by on the fly application of the pseudo-steady-state assumption to the radical reaction intermediates. Depending on the reaction model size, a speed-up factor of More than 50 was obtained compared to the standard ANSYS Fluent routines without losing accuracy. As proof of concept, propane steam cracking in a conventional bare reactor and a helicoidally finned reactor was simulated using a reaction model containing 85 species: 41 radicals and 44 transported species. Next to a drastic speedup of the simulations due to the kinetic network reduction technique, significant differences were observed between the bare and the finned reactor in the three-dimensional simulations. In particular, the ethene selectivity is reduced by 0.20% by application of the helicoidally finned reactor. The one-dimensional simulations were not able to correctly predict the selectivity effect of the different reactor geometry.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
DETAILED MECHANISM GENERATION, REACTION NETWORK GENERATION, COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS, BETA-SCISSION REACTIONS, LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION, GROUP ADDITIVE VALUES, COMPUTER-GENERATION, THERMAL-CRACKING, PREEXPONENTIAL FACTORS, HYDROCARBON RADICALS
journal title
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
volume
54
issue
49
pages
12270 - 12282
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000366878100006
JCR category
ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
JCR impact factor
2.567 (2015)
JCR rank
34/135 (2015)
JCR quartile
2 (2015)
ISSN
0888-5885
DOI
10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02477
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
7016853
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-7016853
date created
2015-12-17 14:08:10
date last changed
2017-03-09 12:52:08
@article{7016853,
  abstract     = {Using detailed kinetic models in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations is extremely challenging because of the large number of species that need to be considered and the stiffness of the associated set of differential equations. The high computational cost associated with using a detail-ea kinetic network in CFD simulations is why one-dimensional simulations are still used, although this leads to substantial differences compared to reference three-dimensional simulations. Therefore, a methodology was developed that,allows one to use, detailed single-event microkinetic Models in CFD simulations by on the fly application of the pseudo-steady-state assumption to the radical reaction intermediates. Depending on the reaction model size, a speed-up factor of More than 50 was obtained compared to the standard ANSYS Fluent routines without losing accuracy. As proof of concept, propane steam cracking in a conventional bare reactor and a helicoidally finned reactor was simulated using a reaction model containing 85 species: 41 radicals and 44 transported species. Next to a drastic speedup of the simulations due to the kinetic network reduction technique, significant differences were observed between the bare and the finned reactor in the three-dimensional simulations. In particular, the ethene selectivity is reduced by 0.20\% by application of the helicoidally finned reactor. The one-dimensional simulations were not able to correctly predict the selectivity effect of the different reactor geometry.},
  author       = {Reyniers, Pieter and Schietekat, Carl and Van Cauwenberge, David and Vandewalle, Laurien and Van Geem, Kevin and Marin, Guy},
  issn         = {0888-5885},
  journal      = {INDUSTRIAL \& ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH},
  keyword      = {DETAILED MECHANISM GENERATION,REACTION NETWORK GENERATION,COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS,BETA-SCISSION REACTIONS,LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION,GROUP ADDITIVE VALUES,COMPUTER-GENERATION,THERMAL-CRACKING,PREEXPONENTIAL FACTORS,HYDROCARBON RADICALS},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {49},
  pages        = {12270--12282},
  title        = {Necessity and feasibility of 3D simulations of steam cracking reactors},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02477},
  volume       = {54},
  year         = {2015},
}

Chicago
Reyniers, Pieter, Carl Schietekat, David Van Cauwenberge, Laurien Vandewalle, Kevin Van Geem, and Guy Marin. 2015. “Necessity and Feasibility of 3D Simulations of Steam Cracking Reactors.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 54 (49): 12270–12282.
APA
Reyniers, P., Schietekat, C., Van Cauwenberge, D., Vandewalle, L., Van Geem, K., & Marin, G. (2015). Necessity and feasibility of 3D simulations of steam cracking reactors. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 54(49), 12270–12282.
Vancouver
1.
Reyniers P, Schietekat C, Van Cauwenberge D, Vandewalle L, Van Geem K, Marin G. Necessity and feasibility of 3D simulations of steam cracking reactors. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH. 2015;54(49):12270–82.
MLA
Reyniers, Pieter, Carl Schietekat, David Van Cauwenberge, et al. “Necessity and Feasibility of 3D Simulations of Steam Cracking Reactors.” INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH 54.49 (2015): 12270–12282. Print.