Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Bayesian versus frequentist methods f...

Bayesian versus frequentist methods for estimating true prevalence of disease and diagnostic test performance

Moussa Sanogo, Emmanuel Abatih (UGent) and Claude Saegerman
(2014) VETERINARY JOURNAL. 202(2). p.204-207
Author
Organization
Keywords
True prevalence, Diagnostic test performance, Bayesian methods, Frequentist methods, Sensitivity, Specificity, GOLD STANDARD, BOVINE BRUCELLOSIS, TEST ACCURACY, CONDITIONAL DEPENDENCE, STATISTICAL-INFERENCE, SCREENING-TEST, TEST CRITERIA, ERROR RATES, ABSENCE, SPECIFICITY

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Sanogo, Moussa, et al. “Bayesian versus Frequentist Methods for Estimating True Prevalence of Disease and Diagnostic Test Performance.” VETERINARY JOURNAL, vol. 202, no. 2, 2014, pp. 204–07, doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.002.
APA
Sanogo, M., Abatih, E., & Saegerman, C. (2014). Bayesian versus frequentist methods for estimating true prevalence of disease and diagnostic test performance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.002
Chicago author-date
Sanogo, Moussa, Emmanuel Abatih, and Claude Saegerman. 2014. “Bayesian versus Frequentist Methods for Estimating True Prevalence of Disease and Diagnostic Test Performance.” VETERINARY JOURNAL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.002.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Sanogo, Moussa, Emmanuel Abatih, and Claude Saegerman. 2014. “Bayesian versus Frequentist Methods for Estimating True Prevalence of Disease and Diagnostic Test Performance.” VETERINARY JOURNAL. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.002.
Vancouver
1.
Sanogo M, Abatih E, Saegerman C. Bayesian versus frequentist methods for estimating true prevalence of disease and diagnostic test performance. Vol. 202, VETERINARY JOURNAL. 2014. p. 204–7.
IEEE
[1]
M. Sanogo, E. Abatih, and C. Saegerman, “Bayesian versus frequentist methods for estimating true prevalence of disease and diagnostic test performance,” VETERINARY JOURNAL, vol. 202, no. 2. pp. 204–207, 2014.
@misc{6992542,
  author       = {{Sanogo, Moussa and Abatih, Emmanuel and Saegerman, Claude}},
  issn         = {{1090-0233}},
  keywords     = {{True prevalence,Diagnostic test performance,Bayesian methods,Frequentist methods,Sensitivity,Specificity,GOLD STANDARD,BOVINE BRUCELLOSIS,TEST ACCURACY,CONDITIONAL DEPENDENCE,STATISTICAL-INFERENCE,SCREENING-TEST,TEST CRITERIA,ERROR RATES,ABSENCE,SPECIFICITY}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{204--207}},
  series       = {{VETERINARY JOURNAL}},
  title        = {{Bayesian versus frequentist methods for estimating true prevalence of disease and diagnostic test performance}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.002}},
  volume       = {{202}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}
Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: