Advanced search
1 file | 92.68 KB Add to list

Response to comment on Rubins v. Latvia: adjucation is not erroneous at all

Dirk Voorhoof (UGent)
(2015)
Author
Organization
Keywords
academic speech, Freedom of expression, whistleblowing, employment relation, blackmail, HRC

Downloads

  • Rubins comment
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • text/html
    • |
    • 92.68 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Voorhoof, Dirk. Response to Comment on Rubins v. Latvia: Adjucation Is Not Erroneous at All. no. Strasbourg Observers Blog 14 April 2015, Strasbourg Observers, 2015.
APA
Voorhoof, D. (2015). Response to comment on Rubins v. Latvia: adjucation is not erroneous at all. Ghent, Belgium: Strasbourg Observers.
Chicago author-date
Voorhoof, Dirk. 2015. “Response to Comment on Rubins v. Latvia: Adjucation Is Not Erroneous at All.” Ghent, Belgium: Strasbourg Observers.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Voorhoof, Dirk. 2015. “Response to Comment on Rubins v. Latvia: Adjucation Is Not Erroneous at All.” Ghent, Belgium: Strasbourg Observers.
Vancouver
1.
Voorhoof D. Response to comment on Rubins v. Latvia: adjucation is not erroneous at all. Ghent, Belgium: Strasbourg Observers; 2015.
IEEE
[1]
D. Voorhoof, “Response to comment on Rubins v. Latvia: adjucation is not erroneous at all,” no. Strasbourg Observers Blog 14 April 2015. Strasbourg Observers, Ghent, Belgium, 2015.
@misc{6962759,
  author       = {{Voorhoof, Dirk}},
  keywords     = {{academic speech,Freedom of expression,whistleblowing,employment relation,blackmail,HRC}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{Strasbourg Observers Blog 14 April 2015}},
  pages        = {{6}},
  publisher    = {{Strasbourg Observers}},
  title        = {{Response to comment on Rubins v. Latvia: adjucation is not erroneous at all}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}