- Author
- Sarah Van Hoof (UGent) and Jürgen Jaspers
- Organization
- Abstract
- We argue in this article that the 1950s through the 1980s mark an exceptional period in Flemish linguistic history that is best described as an era of hyperstandardisation. These decades witnessed a propagandistic, large-scale and highly mediatised linguistic standardisation campaign that has thoroughly ideologised and hierarchised language use in all corners of Flemish society. We will substantiate this by discursively analysing the available sources from this period, proposing that the Flemish ‘intermediate variety’ (tussentaal) should probably be seen as a side effect of hyperstandardisation rather than as the symptom of a transitional stage on the road to full standardisation or the result of a recent decline in standardisation efforts.
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 1.31 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-6962515
- MLA
- Van Hoof, Sarah, and Jürgen Jaspers. “Hyperstandaardisering.” TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR NEDERLANDSE TAAL-EN LETTERKUNDE, vol. 128, no. 1, 2012, pp. 97–125.
- APA
- Van Hoof, S., & Jaspers, J. (2012). Hyperstandaardisering. TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR NEDERLANDSE TAAL-EN LETTERKUNDE, 128(1), 97–125.
- Chicago author-date
- Van Hoof, Sarah, and Jürgen Jaspers. 2012. “Hyperstandaardisering.” TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR NEDERLANDSE TAAL-EN LETTERKUNDE 128 (1): 97–125.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Van Hoof, Sarah, and Jürgen Jaspers. 2012. “Hyperstandaardisering.” TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR NEDERLANDSE TAAL-EN LETTERKUNDE 128 (1): 97–125.
- Vancouver
- 1.Van Hoof S, Jaspers J. Hyperstandaardisering. TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR NEDERLANDSE TAAL-EN LETTERKUNDE. 2012;128(1):97–125.
- IEEE
- [1]S. Van Hoof and J. Jaspers, “Hyperstandaardisering,” TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR NEDERLANDSE TAAL-EN LETTERKUNDE, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 97–125, 2012.
@article{6962515,
abstract = {{We argue in this article that the 1950s through the 1980s mark an exceptional period in Flemish linguistic history that is best described as an era of hyperstandardisation. These decades witnessed a propagandistic, large-scale and highly mediatised linguistic standardisation campaign that has thoroughly ideologised and hierarchised language use in all corners of Flemish society. We will substantiate this by discursively analysing the available sources from this period, proposing that the Flemish ‘intermediate variety’ (tussentaal) should probably be seen as a side effect of hyperstandardisation rather than as the symptom of a transitional stage on the road to full standardisation or the result of a recent decline in standardisation efforts.}},
author = {{Van Hoof, Sarah and Jaspers, Jürgen}},
issn = {{0040-7550}},
journal = {{TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR NEDERLANDSE TAAL-EN LETTERKUNDE}},
language = {{dut}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{97--125}},
title = {{Hyperstandaardisering}},
url = {{https://www.tntl.nl/index.php/tntl/article/view/253/252}},
volume = {{128}},
year = {{2012}},
}