Advanced search
1 file | 707.88 KB Add to list

Comparison of detailed and succinct cohort modelling approaches in a multi-regional evaluation of cervical cancer vaccination

(2008) Vaccine. 26. p.F16-F28
Author
Organization
Abstract
Mathematical models have been used extensively in the evaluation of chronic diseases and in exploring the health economics of vaccination. In this study, we examine the value of having two different cohort models based on similar assumptions, one comprehensive and one simplified, which can be used to evaluate the impact of cervical cancer vaccination. To compare models, we ran cost-effectiveness analyses in four geographical regions (Italy, the UK, Taiwan and Canada). We show that the models produce comparable results and therefore can be used independently. However, as they require different complexities of data inputs, they are more suited to different circumstances depending on the level of data inputs available or the complexity of the research question asked. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 707.88 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Debicki, D., et al. “Comparison of Detailed and Succinct Cohort Modelling Approaches in a Multi-Regional Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Vaccination.” Vaccine, vol. 26, 2008, pp. F16–28, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.02.040.
APA
Debicki, D., Ferko, N., Demarteau, N., Gallivan, S., Bauch, C., Anonychuk, A., … Annemans, L. (2008). Comparison of detailed and succinct cohort modelling approaches in a multi-regional evaluation of cervical cancer vaccination. Vaccine, 26, F16–F28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.02.040
Chicago author-date
Debicki, D, N Ferko, N Demarteau, S Gallivan, C Bauch, A Anonychuk, L Mantovani, et al. 2008. “Comparison of Detailed and Succinct Cohort Modelling Approaches in a Multi-Regional Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Vaccination.” Vaccine 26: F16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.02.040.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Debicki, D, N Ferko, N Demarteau, S Gallivan, C Bauch, A Anonychuk, L Mantovani, S Capri, CY Chou, B Standaert, and Lieven Annemans. 2008. “Comparison of Detailed and Succinct Cohort Modelling Approaches in a Multi-Regional Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Vaccination.” Vaccine 26: F16–F28. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.02.040.
Vancouver
1.
Debicki D, Ferko N, Demarteau N, Gallivan S, Bauch C, Anonychuk A, et al. Comparison of detailed and succinct cohort modelling approaches in a multi-regional evaluation of cervical cancer vaccination. Vaccine. 2008;26:F16–28.
IEEE
[1]
D. Debicki et al., “Comparison of detailed and succinct cohort modelling approaches in a multi-regional evaluation of cervical cancer vaccination,” Vaccine, vol. 26, pp. F16–F28, 2008.
@article{693777,
  abstract     = {{Mathematical models have been used extensively in the evaluation of chronic diseases and in exploring the health economics of vaccination. In this study, we examine the value of having two different cohort models based on similar assumptions, one comprehensive and one simplified, which can be used to evaluate the impact of cervical cancer vaccination. To compare models, we ran cost-effectiveness analyses in four geographical regions (Italy, the UK, Taiwan and Canada). We show that the models produce comparable results and therefore can be used independently. However, as they require different complexities of data inputs, they are more suited to different circumstances depending on the level of data inputs available or the complexity of the research question asked. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.}},
  author       = {{Debicki, D and Ferko, N and Demarteau, N and Gallivan, S and Bauch, C and Anonychuk, A and Mantovani, L and Capri, S and Chou, CY and Standaert, B and Annemans, Lieven}},
  issn         = {{0264-410X}},
  journal      = {{Vaccine}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{F16--F28}},
  title        = {{Comparison of detailed and succinct cohort modelling approaches in a multi-regional evaluation of cervical cancer vaccination}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.02.040}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2008}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: