Advanced search
1 file | 116.72 KB Add to list

Tail docking in horses: a review of the issues

(2007) ANIMAL. 1(8). p.1167-1178
Author
Organization
Abstract
Routinely performed painful procedures are of increasing interest and, in 2001 (Royal Order, May 17), Belgium prohibited docking in several vertebrates including horses. In 2004, opponents to this decision submitted a Bill (Doc51 09691001) to Parliament, intending to obtain derogation for Belgian draught horses, which were traditionally docked. The Animal Welfare Council of Belgium, an official body advising the Minister of Public Health, was asked to evaluate this complex question, including biological, ethical and socio-economic aspects, on the basis of the available peer-reviewed studies. In this context, this study reviews legal aspects (overview of the European legislation), zootechnic aspects (uses of the Belgian draught horse) and biological aspects (pain potentially related to docking; horses' welfare linked to insect harassment and hygiene communication and reproduction) of tail docking in draught horses. We conclude that (1) there is no benefit for horses in tail docking, including Belgian draught horses, (2) potential advantages of docking are essentially in favour of humans and these advantages could be scrupulously re-evaluated, taking into account practices of other countries. Therefore, there is no need to dock any horse other than for veterinary reasons.
Keywords
MERINO SHEEP, DAIRY-CATTLE, NEUROMA FORMATION, POSTOPERATIVE PAIN, ACUTE PAIN, BREECH STRIKE, FLY-AVOIDANCE BEHAVIORS, FARM-ANIMAL WELFARE, GASTEROPHILUS-INTESTINALIS, NEONATAL CIRCUMCISION

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 116.72 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Lefebvre, Denis et al. “Tail Docking in Horses: a Review of the Issues.” ANIMAL 1.8 (2007): 1167–1178. Print.
APA
Lefebvre, D., Lips, D., Odberg, F., & Giffroy, J.-M. (2007). Tail docking in horses: a review of the issues. ANIMAL, 1(8), 1167–1178.
Chicago author-date
Lefebvre, Denis, Dirk Lips, Frank Odberg, and Jean-Marie Giffroy. 2007. “Tail Docking in Horses: a Review of the Issues.” Animal 1 (8): 1167–1178.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Lefebvre, Denis, Dirk Lips, Frank Odberg, and Jean-Marie Giffroy. 2007. “Tail Docking in Horses: a Review of the Issues.” Animal 1 (8): 1167–1178.
Vancouver
1.
Lefebvre D, Lips D, Odberg F, Giffroy J-M. Tail docking in horses: a review of the issues. ANIMAL. 2007;1(8):1167–78.
IEEE
[1]
D. Lefebvre, D. Lips, F. Odberg, and J.-M. Giffroy, “Tail docking in horses: a review of the issues,” ANIMAL, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 1167–1178, 2007.
@article{672672,
  abstract     = {Routinely performed painful procedures are of increasing interest and, in 2001 (Royal Order, May 17), Belgium prohibited docking in several vertebrates including horses. In 2004, opponents to this decision submitted a Bill (Doc51 09691001) to Parliament, intending to obtain derogation for Belgian draught horses, which were traditionally docked. The Animal Welfare Council of Belgium, an official body advising the Minister of Public Health, was asked to evaluate this complex question, including biological, ethical and socio-economic aspects, on the basis of the available peer-reviewed studies. In this context, this study reviews legal aspects (overview of the European legislation), zootechnic aspects (uses of the Belgian draught horse) and biological aspects (pain potentially related to docking; horses' welfare linked to insect harassment and hygiene communication and reproduction) of tail docking in draught horses. We conclude that (1) there is no benefit for horses in tail docking, including Belgian draught horses, (2) potential advantages of docking are essentially in favour of humans and these advantages could be scrupulously re-evaluated, taking into account practices of other countries. Therefore, there is no need to dock any horse other than for veterinary reasons.},
  author       = {Lefebvre, Denis and Lips, Dirk and Odberg, Frank and Giffroy, Jean-Marie},
  issn         = {1751-7311},
  journal      = {ANIMAL},
  keywords     = {MERINO SHEEP,DAIRY-CATTLE,NEUROMA FORMATION,POSTOPERATIVE PAIN,ACUTE PAIN,BREECH STRIKE,FLY-AVOIDANCE BEHAVIORS,FARM-ANIMAL WELFARE,GASTEROPHILUS-INTESTINALIS,NEONATAL CIRCUMCISION},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {8},
  pages        = {1167--1178},
  title        = {Tail docking in horses: a review of the issues},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107000420},
  volume       = {1},
  year         = {2007},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: