Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters

Marcus Clauss UGent, R Frey, B Kiefer, M Lechner-Doll, W Loehlein, C Polster, GE Rössner and W Jürgen Streich (2003) OECOLOGIA. 136(1). p.14-27
abstract
An oft-cited nutritional advantage of large body size is that larger animals have lower relative energy requirements and that, due to their increased gastrointestinal tract (GIT) capacity, they achieve longer ingesta passage rates, which allows them to use forage of lower quality. However, the fermentation of plant material cannot be optimized endlessly; there is a time when plant fibre is totally fermented, and another when energy losses due to methanogenic bacteria become punitive. Therefore, very large herbivores would need to evolve adaptations for a comparative acceleration of ingesta passage. To our knowledge, this phenomenon has not been emphasized in the literature to date. We propose that, among the extant herbivores, elephants, with their comparatively fast passage rate and low digestibility coefficients, are indicators of a trend that allowed even larger hindgut fermenting mammals to exist. The limited existing anatomical data on large hindgut fermenters suggests that both a relative shortening of the GIT, an increase in GIT diameter, and a reduced caecum might contribute to relatively faster ingesta passage; however, more anatomical data is needed to verify these hypotheses. The digestive physiology of large foregut fermenters presents a unique problem: ruminant-and nonruminant-forestomachs were designed to delay ingesta passage, and they limit food intake as a side effect. Therefore, with increasing body size and increasing absolute energy requirements, their relative capacity has to increase in order to compensate for this intake limitation. It seems that the foregut fermenting ungulates did not evolve species in which the intake-limiting effect of the foregut could be reduced, e.g. by special bypass structures, and hence this digestive model imposed an intrinsic body size limit. This limit will be lower the more the natural diet enhances the ingesta retention and hence the intake-limiting effect. Therefore, due to the mechanical characteristics of grass, grazing ruminants cannot become as big as the largest browsing ruminant. Ruminants are not absent from the very large body size classes because their digestive physiology offers no particular advantage, but because their digestive physiology itself intrinsically imposes a body size limit. We suggest that the decreasing ability for colonic water absorption in large grazing ruminants and the largest extant foregut fermenter, the hippopotamus, are an indication of this limit, and are the outcome of the competition of organs for the available space within the abdominal cavity. Our hypotheses are supported by the fossil record on extinct ruminant/tylopod species which did not, with the possible exception of the Sivatheriinae, surpass extant species in maximum body size. In contrast to foregut fermentation, the GIT design of hindgut fermenters allows adaptations for relative passage acceleration, which explains why very large extinct mammalian herbivores are thought to have been hindgut fermenters.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (review)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
browsers, ruminants, grazers, passage rate, fermentation, AFRICAN WILD RUMINANTS, DIGESTIVE PHYSIOLOGY, HIPPOPOTAMUS-AMPHIBIUS, COLONIC ABSORPTION, ECOLOGY, DIET, EVOLUTION, ANTELOPE, ELEPHANT, ELECTROLYTES
journal title
OECOLOGIA
Oecologia
volume
136
issue
1
pages
14 - 27
Web of Science type
Review
Web of Science id
000183638000002
JCR category
ECOLOGY
JCR impact factor
3.128 (2003)
JCR rank
14/105 (2003)
JCR quartile
1 (2003)
ISSN
0029-8549
DOI
10.1007/s00442-003-1254-z
language
English
UGent publication?
no
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
668271
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-668271
date created
2009-05-27 11:12:52
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:45:44
@article{668271,
  abstract     = {An oft-cited nutritional advantage of large body size is that larger animals have lower relative energy requirements and that, due to their increased gastrointestinal tract (GIT) capacity, they achieve longer ingesta passage rates, which allows them to use forage of lower quality. However, the fermentation of plant material cannot be optimized endlessly; there is a time when plant fibre is totally fermented, and another when energy losses due to methanogenic bacteria become punitive. Therefore, very large herbivores would need to evolve adaptations for a comparative acceleration of ingesta passage. To our knowledge, this phenomenon has not been emphasized in the literature to date. We propose that, among the extant herbivores, elephants, with their comparatively fast passage rate and low digestibility coefficients, are indicators of a trend that allowed even larger hindgut fermenting mammals to exist. The limited existing anatomical data on large hindgut fermenters suggests that both a relative shortening of the GIT, an increase in GIT diameter, and a reduced caecum might contribute to relatively faster ingesta passage; however, more anatomical data is needed to verify these hypotheses. The digestive physiology of large foregut fermenters presents a unique problem: ruminant-and nonruminant-forestomachs were designed to delay ingesta passage, and they limit food intake as a side effect. Therefore, with increasing body size and increasing absolute energy requirements, their relative capacity has to increase in order to compensate for this intake limitation. It seems that the foregut fermenting ungulates did not evolve species in which the intake-limiting effect of the foregut could be reduced, e.g. by special bypass structures, and hence this digestive model imposed an intrinsic body size limit. This limit will be lower the more the natural diet enhances the ingesta retention and hence the intake-limiting effect. Therefore, due to the mechanical characteristics of grass, grazing ruminants cannot become as big as the largest browsing ruminant. Ruminants are not absent from the very large body size classes because their digestive physiology offers no particular advantage, but because their digestive physiology itself intrinsically imposes a body size limit. We suggest that the decreasing ability for colonic water absorption in large grazing ruminants and the largest extant foregut fermenter, the hippopotamus, are an indication of this limit, and are the outcome of the competition of organs for the available space within the abdominal cavity. Our hypotheses are supported by the fossil record on extinct ruminant/tylopod species which did not, with the possible exception of the Sivatheriinae, surpass extant species in maximum body size. In contrast to foregut fermentation, the GIT design of hindgut fermenters allows adaptations for relative passage acceleration, which explains why very large extinct mammalian herbivores are thought to have been hindgut fermenters.},
  author       = {Clauss, Marcus and Frey, R and Kiefer, B and Lechner-Doll, M and Loehlein, W and Polster, C and R{\"o}ssner, GE and Streich, W J{\"u}rgen},
  issn         = {0029-8549},
  journal      = {OECOLOGIA},
  keyword      = {browsers,ruminants,grazers,passage rate,fermentation,AFRICAN WILD RUMINANTS,DIGESTIVE PHYSIOLOGY,HIPPOPOTAMUS-AMPHIBIUS,COLONIC ABSORPTION,ECOLOGY,DIET,EVOLUTION,ANTELOPE,ELEPHANT,ELECTROLYTES},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {14--27},
  title        = {The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1254-z},
  volume       = {136},
  year         = {2003},
}

Chicago
Clauss, Marcus, R Frey, B Kiefer, M Lechner-Doll, W Loehlein, C Polster, GE Rössner, and W Jürgen Streich. 2003. “The Maximum Attainable Body Size of Herbivorous Mammals: Morphophysiological Constraints on Foregut, and Adaptations of Hindgut Fermenters.” Oecologia 136 (1): 14–27.
APA
Clauss, Marcus, Frey, R., Kiefer, B., Lechner-Doll, M., Loehlein, W., Polster, C., Rössner, G., et al. (2003). The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters. OECOLOGIA, 136(1), 14–27.
Vancouver
1.
Clauss M, Frey R, Kiefer B, Lechner-Doll M, Loehlein W, Polster C, et al. The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters. OECOLOGIA. 2003;136(1):14–27.
MLA
Clauss, Marcus, R Frey, B Kiefer, et al. “The Maximum Attainable Body Size of Herbivorous Mammals: Morphophysiological Constraints on Foregut, and Adaptations of Hindgut Fermenters.” OECOLOGIA 136.1 (2003): 14–27. Print.