Advanced search
Add to list

Mainstream economics: searching where the light is

Author
Organization
Abstract
The starting point of this paper is the question of how to explain mainstream economics' great level of acceptance in the face of its poor empirical track record. An explanation is provided in terms of a combination of unification and, most importantly, inference to the best explanation. This paper asks whether the appeal of mainstream economics to inference to the best explanation is justified and as a consequence questions one of the main reasons for the dominance of mainstream economics today. The final section integrates the ideas from the previous sections into a general framework for explanatory pluralism.
Keywords
EXPLANATORY UNIFICATION, unification, mainstream economics, explanatory pluralism, inference to the best explanation, POPULATION BIOLOGY, STRATEGY, SCIENCE

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
De Langhe, Rogier. “Mainstream Economics: Searching Where the Light Is.” JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS, vol. 32, no. 1, 2009, pp. 137–50, doi:10.2753/PKE0160-3477320109.
APA
De Langhe, R. (2009). Mainstream economics: searching where the light is. JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS, 32(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477320109
Chicago author-date
De Langhe, Rogier. 2009. “Mainstream Economics: Searching Where the Light Is.” JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS 32 (1): 137–50. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477320109.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
De Langhe, Rogier. 2009. “Mainstream Economics: Searching Where the Light Is.” JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS 32 (1): 137–150. doi:10.2753/PKE0160-3477320109.
Vancouver
1.
De Langhe R. Mainstream economics: searching where the light is. JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS. 2009;32(1):137–50.
IEEE
[1]
R. De Langhe, “Mainstream economics: searching where the light is,” JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 137–150, 2009.
@article{663049,
  abstract     = {{The starting point of this paper is the question of how to explain mainstream economics' great level of acceptance in the face of its poor empirical track record. An explanation is provided in terms of a combination of unification and, most importantly, inference to the best explanation. This paper asks whether the appeal of mainstream economics to inference to the best explanation is justified and as a consequence questions one of the main reasons for the dominance of mainstream economics today. The final section integrates the ideas from the previous sections into a general framework for explanatory pluralism.}},
  author       = {{De Langhe, Rogier}},
  issn         = {{0160-3477}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS}},
  keywords     = {{EXPLANATORY UNIFICATION,unification,mainstream economics,explanatory pluralism,inference to the best explanation,POPULATION BIOLOGY,STRATEGY,SCIENCE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{137--150}},
  title        = {{Mainstream economics: searching where the light is}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477320109}},
  volume       = {{32}},
  year         = {{2009}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: