Advanced search
2 files | 525.44 KB Add to list

How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory

(2009) BRAIN AND LANGUAGE. 108(2). p.112-121
Author
Organization
Keywords
PROCESSING MODEL, FORM AREA, NEIGHBORHOOD FREQUENCY, MAGNETIC STIMULATION, LANGUAGE DOMINANCE, FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY, LEXICAL DECISION, PRINTED WORD, REPRESENTATION, CORTEX

Downloads

  • Van der Haegen et al 2009 Penultimate Version.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 273.99 KB
  • Van der Haegen et al 2009 Brain Language.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 251.45 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Van der Haegen, Lise, et al. “How Does Interhemispheric Communication in Visual Word Recognition Work? Deciding between Early and Late Integration Accounts of the Split Fovea Theory.” BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, vol. 108, no. 2, ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE, 2009, pp. 112–21, doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.005.
APA
Van der Haegen, L., Brysbaert, M., & Davis, C. J. (2009). How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 108(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.005
Chicago author-date
Van der Haegen, Lise, Marc Brysbaert, and Colin J. Davis. 2009. “How Does Interhemispheric Communication in Visual Word Recognition Work? Deciding between Early and Late Integration Accounts of the Split Fovea Theory.” BRAIN AND LANGUAGE 108 (2): 112–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.005.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Van der Haegen, Lise, Marc Brysbaert, and Colin J. Davis. 2009. “How Does Interhemispheric Communication in Visual Word Recognition Work? Deciding between Early and Late Integration Accounts of the Split Fovea Theory.” BRAIN AND LANGUAGE 108 (2): 112–121. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.005.
Vancouver
1.
Van der Haegen L, Brysbaert M, Davis CJ. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE. 2009;108(2):112–21.
IEEE
[1]
L. Van der Haegen, M. Brysbaert, and C. J. Davis, “How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory,” BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 112–121, 2009.
@article{599777,
  author       = {{Van der Haegen, Lise and Brysbaert, Marc and Davis, Colin J.}},
  issn         = {{0093-934X}},
  journal      = {{BRAIN AND LANGUAGE}},
  keywords     = {{PROCESSING MODEL,FORM AREA,NEIGHBORHOOD FREQUENCY,MAGNETIC STIMULATION,LANGUAGE DOMINANCE,FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY,LEXICAL DECISION,PRINTED WORD,REPRESENTATION,CORTEX}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{112--121}},
  publisher    = {{ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE}},
  title        = {{How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.005}},
  volume       = {{108}},
  year         = {{2009}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: