Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Dynamic identifiability analysis-based model structure evaluation considering rating curve uncertainty

Stijn Van Hoey, Ingmar Nopens UGent, Johannes van der Kwast and Piet Seuntjens UGent (2015) JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING. 20(5).
abstract
When applying hydrological models, different sources of uncertainty are present, and evaluations of model performances should take these into account to assess model outcomes correctly. Furthermore, uncertainty in the discharge observations complicates the model identification, both in terms of model structure and parameterization. In this paper, the authors compare two different lumped model structures (PDM and NAM) considering uncertainty coming from the rating curve. Limits of acceptability for the model simulations were determined based on derived uncertainty bounds of the discharge observations. The authors applied the DYNamic Identifiability Approach (DYNIA) to identify structural failure of both models and to evaluate the configuration of their structures. In general, similar model performances are observed. However, the model structures tend to behave differently in the course of time, as revealed by the DYNIA approach. Based on the analyses performed, the probability based soil storage representation of the PDM model outperforms the NAM structure. The incorporation of the observation error did not prevent the DYNIA analysis to identify potential model structural deficiencies that are limiting the representation of the seasonal variation, primarily indicated by shifting regions of parameter identifiability. As such, the proposed approach is able to indicate where deficiencies are found and model improvement is needed.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
DATA ASSIMILATION, CATCHMENT, FLOW, IDENTIFICATION, ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, IMPROVED CALIBRATION, PARAMETER-ESTIMATION, HYDROLOGICAL MODELS, RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL, PROBABILITY-DISTRIBUTED MODEL, Uncertainty, Parameter identifiability, Sensitivity analysis, Mathematical models
journal title
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING
J. Hydrol. Eng.
volume
20
issue
5
article number
04014072
pages
17 pages
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000353995400002
JCR category
ENGINEERING, CIVIL
JCR impact factor
1.53 (2015)
JCR rank
40/126 (2015)
JCR quartile
2 (2015)
ISSN
1084-0699
DOI
10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000995
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
5974358
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-5974358
date created
2015-06-03 14:26:23
date last changed
2016-12-21 15:41:23
@article{5974358,
  abstract     = {When applying hydrological models, different sources of uncertainty are present, and evaluations of model performances should take these into account to assess model outcomes correctly. Furthermore, uncertainty in the discharge observations complicates the model identification, both in terms of model structure and parameterization. In this paper, the authors compare two different lumped model structures (PDM and NAM) considering uncertainty coming from the rating curve. Limits of acceptability for the model simulations were determined based on derived uncertainty bounds of the discharge observations. The authors applied the DYNamic Identifiability Approach (DYNIA) to identify structural failure of both models and to evaluate the configuration of their structures. In general, similar model performances are observed. However, the model structures tend to behave differently in the course of time, as revealed by the DYNIA approach. Based on the analyses performed, the probability based soil storage representation of the PDM model outperforms the NAM structure. The incorporation of the observation error did not prevent the DYNIA analysis to identify potential model structural deficiencies that are limiting the representation of the seasonal variation, primarily indicated by shifting regions of parameter identifiability. As such, the proposed approach is able to indicate where deficiencies are found and model improvement is needed.},
  articleno    = {04014072},
  author       = {Van Hoey, Stijn and Nopens, Ingmar and van der Kwast, Johannes and Seuntjens, Piet},
  issn         = {1084-0699},
  journal      = {JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING},
  keyword      = {DATA ASSIMILATION,CATCHMENT,FLOW,IDENTIFICATION,ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,IMPROVED CALIBRATION,PARAMETER-ESTIMATION,HYDROLOGICAL MODELS,RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL,PROBABILITY-DISTRIBUTED MODEL,Uncertainty,Parameter identifiability,Sensitivity analysis,Mathematical models},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {5},
  pages        = {17},
  title        = {Dynamic identifiability analysis-based model structure evaluation considering rating curve uncertainty},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000995},
  volume       = {20},
  year         = {2015},
}

Chicago
Van Hoey, Stijn, Ingmar Nopens, Johannes van der Kwast, and Piet Seuntjens. 2015. “Dynamic Identifiability Analysis-based Model Structure Evaluation Considering Rating Curve Uncertainty.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 20 (5).
APA
Van Hoey, S., Nopens, I., van der Kwast, J., & Seuntjens, P. (2015). Dynamic identifiability analysis-based model structure evaluation considering rating curve uncertainty. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 20(5).
Vancouver
1.
Van Hoey S, Nopens I, van der Kwast J, Seuntjens P. Dynamic identifiability analysis-based model structure evaluation considering rating curve uncertainty. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING. 2015;20(5).
MLA
Van Hoey, Stijn, Ingmar Nopens, Johannes van der Kwast, et al. “Dynamic Identifiability Analysis-based Model Structure Evaluation Considering Rating Curve Uncertainty.” JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING 20.5 (2015): n. pag. Print.