The Nasality Severity Index 2.0 : revision of an objective multiparametric approach to hypernasality
- Author
- Kim Bettens (UGent) , Kristiane Van Lierde (UGent) , Paul Corthals (UGent) , Anke Luyten and Floris Wuyts (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Objective: Due to the multidimensional nature of resonance disorders, multivariate diagnostic assessment is advisable. The nasality severity index (NSI) is based on this point of view. Because of the influence of personal and environmental variables on the current NSI, this study aims to refine this index. Design: Prospective case-control study. Setting: Tertiary university hospital. Patients: Forty-two patients with cleft lip and palate and 50 children without resonance disorders were tested. Interventions: Resonance was investigated by perceptual as well as objective measurements. A Nasometer was used to score nasalance, and spectral speech characteristics of a sustained sound /i:/ were determined, among which the voice low tone to high tone ratio (VLHR). Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the optimal index to discriminate patients from control children. Additionally, the validity of the index was determined based on data from an independent patient and control group. Results: The NSI 2.0, a weighted linear combination of three variables, can be obtained using the equation NSI 2.0¼13.20(.0824 x nasalance /u:/ [%])(.260 x nasalance oral text [%])(.242 x VLHR 4.47*F0 [dB]). The NSI has a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 100%. Moreover, it has excellent validity (sensitivity 88%, specificity 89%). Conclusions: The NSI 2.0 discriminates patients from control children with high sensitivity, specificity, and validity. This multiparametric method can offer a more powerful approach in the assessment and treatment planning of individuals with hypernasality.
- Keywords
- cleft palate, assessment, nasality severity index, hypernasality, HIGH TONE RATIO, VOICE LOW TONE, DIRECT MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION, NASALANCE SCORES, CLEFT-PALATE, VELOPHARYNGEAL INSUFFICIENCY, SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS, PERCEPTUAL ASSESSMENT, SPEAKING CHILDREN, SPEECH
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 157.32 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-5908804
- MLA
- Bettens, Kim, et al. “The Nasality Severity Index 2.0 : Revision of an Objective Multiparametric Approach to Hypernasality.” CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, vol. 53, no. 3, 2016, pp. e60–70, doi:10.1597/14-247.
- APA
- Bettens, K., Van Lierde, K., Corthals, P., Luyten, A., & Wuyts, F. (2016). The Nasality Severity Index 2.0 : revision of an objective multiparametric approach to hypernasality. CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 53(3), e60–e70. https://doi.org/10.1597/14-247
- Chicago author-date
- Bettens, Kim, Kristiane Van Lierde, Paul Corthals, Anke Luyten, and Floris Wuyts. 2016. “The Nasality Severity Index 2.0 : Revision of an Objective Multiparametric Approach to Hypernasality.” CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL 53 (3): e60–70. https://doi.org/10.1597/14-247.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Bettens, Kim, Kristiane Van Lierde, Paul Corthals, Anke Luyten, and Floris Wuyts. 2016. “The Nasality Severity Index 2.0 : Revision of an Objective Multiparametric Approach to Hypernasality.” CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL 53 (3): e60–e70. doi:10.1597/14-247.
- Vancouver
- 1.Bettens K, Van Lierde K, Corthals P, Luyten A, Wuyts F. The Nasality Severity Index 2.0 : revision of an objective multiparametric approach to hypernasality. CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL. 2016;53(3):e60–70.
- IEEE
- [1]K. Bettens, K. Van Lierde, P. Corthals, A. Luyten, and F. Wuyts, “The Nasality Severity Index 2.0 : revision of an objective multiparametric approach to hypernasality,” CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. e60–e70, 2016.
@article{5908804, abstract = {{Objective: Due to the multidimensional nature of resonance disorders, multivariate diagnostic assessment is advisable. The nasality severity index (NSI) is based on this point of view. Because of the influence of personal and environmental variables on the current NSI, this study aims to refine this index. Design: Prospective case-control study. Setting: Tertiary university hospital. Patients: Forty-two patients with cleft lip and palate and 50 children without resonance disorders were tested. Interventions: Resonance was investigated by perceptual as well as objective measurements. A Nasometer was used to score nasalance, and spectral speech characteristics of a sustained sound /i:/ were determined, among which the voice low tone to high tone ratio (VLHR). Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the optimal index to discriminate patients from control children. Additionally, the validity of the index was determined based on data from an independent patient and control group. Results: The NSI 2.0, a weighted linear combination of three variables, can be obtained using the equation NSI 2.0¼13.20(.0824 x nasalance /u:/ [%])(.260 x nasalance oral text [%])(.242 x VLHR 4.47*F0 [dB]). The NSI has a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 100%. Moreover, it has excellent validity (sensitivity 88%, specificity 89%). Conclusions: The NSI 2.0 discriminates patients from control children with high sensitivity, specificity, and validity. This multiparametric method can offer a more powerful approach in the assessment and treatment planning of individuals with hypernasality.}}, author = {{Bettens, Kim and Van Lierde, Kristiane and Corthals, Paul and Luyten, Anke and Wuyts, Floris}}, issn = {{1545-1569}}, journal = {{CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL}}, keywords = {{cleft palate,assessment,nasality severity index,hypernasality,HIGH TONE RATIO,VOICE LOW TONE,DIRECT MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION,NASALANCE SCORES,CLEFT-PALATE,VELOPHARYNGEAL INSUFFICIENCY,SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS,PERCEPTUAL ASSESSMENT,SPEAKING CHILDREN,SPEECH}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{e60--e70}}, title = {{The Nasality Severity Index 2.0 : revision of an objective multiparametric approach to hypernasality}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1597/14-247}}, volume = {{53}}, year = {{2016}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: