Advanced search
1 file | 3.64 MB Add to list

Metal mixture modeling evaluation project, 2: comparison of four modeling approaches

Author
Organization
Keywords
Metal toxicity, WHAM-F-TOX, Metal bioavailability, Concentration addition, Biotic ligand model, BIOTIC LIGAND MODEL, TROUT ONCORHYNCHUS-MYKISS, RAINBOW-TROUT, ACUTE TOXICITY, HUMIC SUBSTANCES, DAPHNIA-MAGNA, ION-BINDING, ZINC TOXICITY, AQUATIC BIOTA, SOFT WATERS

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 3.64 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Farley, Kevin J., et al. “Metal Mixture Modeling Evaluation Project, 2: Comparison of Four Modeling Approaches.” ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, vol. 34, no. 4, 2015, pp. 741–53, doi:10.1002/etc.2820.
APA
Farley, K. J., Meyer, J. S., Balistrieri, L. S., De Schamphelaere, K., Iwasaki, Y., Janssen, C., … Tipping, E. (2015). Metal mixture modeling evaluation project, 2: comparison of four modeling approaches. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 34(4), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2820
Chicago author-date
Farley, Kevin J, Joseph S Meyer, Laurie S Balistrieri, Karel De Schamphelaere, Yuichi Iwasaki, Colin Janssen, Masashi Kamo, et al. 2015. “Metal Mixture Modeling Evaluation Project, 2: Comparison of Four Modeling Approaches.” ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY 34 (4): 741–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2820.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Farley, Kevin J, Joseph S Meyer, Laurie S Balistrieri, Karel De Schamphelaere, Yuichi Iwasaki, Colin Janssen, Masashi Kamo, Stephen Lofts, Christopher A Mebane, Wataru Naito, Adam C Ryan, Robert C Santore, and Edward Tipping. 2015. “Metal Mixture Modeling Evaluation Project, 2: Comparison of Four Modeling Approaches.” ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY 34 (4): 741–753. doi:10.1002/etc.2820.
Vancouver
1.
Farley KJ, Meyer JS, Balistrieri LS, De Schamphelaere K, Iwasaki Y, Janssen C, et al. Metal mixture modeling evaluation project, 2: comparison of four modeling approaches. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY. 2015;34(4):741–53.
IEEE
[1]
K. J. Farley et al., “Metal mixture modeling evaluation project, 2: comparison of four modeling approaches,” ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 741–753, 2015.
@article{5902902,
  author       = {{Farley, Kevin J and Meyer, Joseph S and Balistrieri, Laurie S and De Schamphelaere, Karel and Iwasaki, Yuichi and Janssen, Colin and Kamo, Masashi and Lofts, Stephen and Mebane, Christopher A and Naito, Wataru and Ryan, Adam C and Santore, Robert C and Tipping, Edward}},
  issn         = {{0730-7268}},
  journal      = {{ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY}},
  keywords     = {{Metal toxicity,WHAM-F-TOX,Metal bioavailability,Concentration addition,Biotic ligand model,BIOTIC LIGAND MODEL,TROUT ONCORHYNCHUS-MYKISS,RAINBOW-TROUT,ACUTE TOXICITY,HUMIC SUBSTANCES,DAPHNIA-MAGNA,ION-BINDING,ZINC TOXICITY,AQUATIC BIOTA,SOFT WATERS}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{741--753}},
  title        = {{Metal mixture modeling evaluation project, 2: comparison of four modeling approaches}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.2820}},
  volume       = {{34}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: