Development and usability of a computer-tailored pedometer-based physical activity advice for breast cancer survivors
- Author
- Katrien De Cocker (UGent) , Caroline Charlier (UGent) , E Van Hoof, Evelyn Pauwels (UGent) , L Lechner, Jan Bourgois (UGent) , Heleen Spittaels (UGent) , C Vandelanotte and Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- This observational study aimed to adapt a computer-tailored step advice for the general population into a feasible advice for breast cancer survivors and to test its usability. First, several adaptations were made to the original design (adding cancer-related physical activity (PA) barriers and beliefs, and self-management strategies to improve survivors' personal control). Second, the adapted advice was evaluated in two phases: (1) a usability testing in healthy women (n = 3) and survivors (n = 6); and (2) a process evaluation during 3 weeks in breast cancer survivors (n = 8). Preliminary usability testing revealed no problems during logging-in; however, three survivors misinterpreted some questions. After refining the questionnaire and advice, survivors evaluated the advice as interesting, attractive to read, comprehensible and credible. Inactive survivors found the advice novel, but too long. The process evaluation indicated that the majority of the women (n = 5/8) reported increased steps. Monitoring step counts by using a pedometer was perceived as an important motivator to be more active. To conclude, this study provides initial support for the usability and acceptability of a computer-tailored pedometer-based PA advice for breast cancer survivors. After testing efficacy and effectiveness of this intervention, this tool can broaden the reach of PA promotion in breast cancer survivors.
- Keywords
- Internet, breast cancer, computer-tailoring, step-counts, women, survivorship, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL, 6 MONTHS POSTTREATMENT, ACTIVITY INTERVENTION, EXERCISE, BEHAVIORS, EFFICACY, QUALITY, PEOPLE, ADULTS, LIFE
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 96.30 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-5799957
- MLA
- De Cocker, Katrien, et al. “Development and Usability of a Computer-Tailored Pedometer-Based Physical Activity Advice for Breast Cancer Survivors.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, vol. 24, no. 5, 2015, pp. 673–82, doi:10.1111/ecc.12225.
- APA
- De Cocker, K., Charlier, C., Van Hoof, E., Pauwels, E., Lechner, L., Bourgois, J., … De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2015). Development and usability of a computer-tailored pedometer-based physical activity advice for breast cancer survivors. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 24(5), 673–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12225
- Chicago author-date
- De Cocker, Katrien, Caroline Charlier, E Van Hoof, Evelyn Pauwels, L Lechner, Jan Bourgois, Heleen Spittaels, C Vandelanotte, and Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij. 2015. “Development and Usability of a Computer-Tailored Pedometer-Based Physical Activity Advice for Breast Cancer Survivors.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE 24 (5): 673–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12225.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- De Cocker, Katrien, Caroline Charlier, E Van Hoof, Evelyn Pauwels, L Lechner, Jan Bourgois, Heleen Spittaels, C Vandelanotte, and Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij. 2015. “Development and Usability of a Computer-Tailored Pedometer-Based Physical Activity Advice for Breast Cancer Survivors.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE 24 (5): 673–682. doi:10.1111/ecc.12225.
- Vancouver
- 1.De Cocker K, Charlier C, Van Hoof E, Pauwels E, Lechner L, Bourgois J, et al. Development and usability of a computer-tailored pedometer-based physical activity advice for breast cancer survivors. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE. 2015;24(5):673–82.
- IEEE
- [1]K. De Cocker et al., “Development and usability of a computer-tailored pedometer-based physical activity advice for breast cancer survivors,” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 673–682, 2015.
@article{5799957,
abstract = {{This observational study aimed to adapt a computer-tailored step advice for the general population into a feasible advice for breast cancer survivors and to test its usability. First, several adaptations were made to the original design (adding cancer-related physical activity (PA) barriers and beliefs, and self-management strategies to improve survivors' personal control). Second, the adapted advice was evaluated in two phases: (1) a usability testing in healthy women (n = 3) and survivors (n = 6); and (2) a process evaluation during 3 weeks in breast cancer survivors (n = 8). Preliminary usability testing revealed no problems during logging-in; however, three survivors misinterpreted some questions. After refining the questionnaire and advice, survivors evaluated the advice as interesting, attractive to read, comprehensible and credible. Inactive survivors found the advice novel, but too long. The process evaluation indicated that the majority of the women (n = 5/8) reported increased steps. Monitoring step counts by using a pedometer was perceived as an important motivator to be more active. To conclude, this study provides initial support for the usability and acceptability of a computer-tailored pedometer-based PA advice for breast cancer survivors. After testing efficacy and effectiveness of this intervention, this tool can broaden the reach of PA promotion in breast cancer survivors.}},
author = {{De Cocker, Katrien and Charlier, Caroline and Van Hoof, E and Pauwels, Evelyn and Lechner, L and Bourgois, Jan and Spittaels, Heleen and Vandelanotte, C and De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse}},
issn = {{0961-5423}},
journal = {{EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE}},
keywords = {{Internet,breast cancer,computer-tailoring,step-counts,women,survivorship,RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL,6 MONTHS POSTTREATMENT,ACTIVITY INTERVENTION,EXERCISE,BEHAVIORS,EFFICACY,QUALITY,PEOPLE,ADULTS,LIFE}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{5}},
pages = {{673--682}},
title = {{Development and usability of a computer-tailored pedometer-based physical activity advice for breast cancer survivors}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12225}},
volume = {{24}},
year = {{2015}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: