Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Establishing cooperation in a mixed-motive social dilemma: an fMRI study investigating the role of social value orientation and dispositional trust

Griet Emonds, Carolyn H Declerck, Christophe Boone, Ruth Seurinck and Rik Achten (2014) SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE. 9(1). p.10-22
abstract
When people are confronted with social dilemmas, their decision-making strategies tend to be associated with individual social preferences; prosocials have an intrinsic willingness to cooperate, while proselfs need extrinsic motivators signaling personal gain. In this study, the biological roots for the proselfs/prosocials concept are explored by investigating the neural correlates of cooperative versus defect decisions when participants engage in a series of one-shot, anonymous prisoner's dilemma situations. Our data are in line with previous studies showing that prosocials activate several social cognition regions of the brain more than proselfs (here: medial prefrontal cortex, temporo-parietal junction, and precuneus BA 7 (Brodmann area 7), and that dispositional trust positively affects prosocials' decisions to cooperate. At the neural level, however, dispositional trust appears to exert a greater marginal effect on brain activity of proselfs in three social cognition regions, which does not translate into an increase in cooperation. An event-related analysis shows that cooperating prosocials show significantly more activation in the precuneus (BA 7) than proselfs. Based on previous research, we interpret this result to be consistent with prosocials' enhanced tendency to infer the intentions of others in social dilemma games, and the importance of establishing norm congruence when they decide to cooperate.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
SELF, FOUNDATIONS, Cooperation, Trust, Social value orientation, Decision-making, Prisoner's dilemma, GAME, BRAIN, MIND, FALSE-BELIEF, BASES, DECISION-MAKING, NEURAL BASIS, INTERPERSONAL INTERACTIONS
journal title
SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE
volume
9
issue
1
pages
10 - 22
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000328929900002
JCR category
PSYCHOLOGY
JCR impact factor
2.66 (2014)
JCR rank
27/76 (2014)
JCR quartile
2 (2014)
ISSN
1747-0919
DOI
10.1080/17470919.2013.858080
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
5799173
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-5799173
date created
2015-01-08 10:24:08
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:40:01
@article{5799173,
  abstract     = {When people are confronted with social dilemmas, their decision-making strategies tend to be associated with individual social preferences; prosocials have an intrinsic willingness to cooperate, while proselfs need extrinsic motivators signaling personal gain. In this study, the biological roots for the proselfs/prosocials concept are explored by investigating the neural correlates of cooperative versus defect decisions when participants engage in a series of one-shot, anonymous prisoner's dilemma situations. Our data are in line with previous studies showing that prosocials activate several social cognition regions of the brain more than proselfs (here: medial prefrontal cortex, temporo-parietal junction, and precuneus BA 7 (Brodmann area 7), and that dispositional trust positively affects prosocials' decisions to cooperate. At the neural level, however, dispositional trust appears to exert a greater marginal effect on brain activity of proselfs in three social cognition regions, which does not translate into an increase in cooperation. An event-related analysis shows that cooperating prosocials show significantly more activation in the precuneus (BA 7) than proselfs. Based on previous research, we interpret this result to be consistent with prosocials' enhanced tendency to infer the intentions of others in social dilemma games, and the importance of establishing norm congruence when they decide to cooperate.},
  author       = {Emonds, Griet and Declerck, Carolyn H and Boone, Christophe and Seurinck, Ruth and Achten, Rik},
  issn         = {1747-0919},
  journal      = {SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE},
  keyword      = {SELF,FOUNDATIONS,Cooperation,Trust,Social value orientation,Decision-making,Prisoner's dilemma,GAME,BRAIN,MIND,FALSE-BELIEF,BASES,DECISION-MAKING,NEURAL BASIS,INTERPERSONAL INTERACTIONS},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {10--22},
  title        = {Establishing cooperation in a mixed-motive social dilemma: an fMRI study investigating the role of social value orientation and dispositional trust},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.858080},
  volume       = {9},
  year         = {2014},
}

Chicago
Emonds, Griet, Carolyn H Declerck, Christophe Boone, Ruth Seurinck, and Rik Achten. 2014. “Establishing Cooperation in a Mixed-motive Social Dilemma: An fMRI Study Investigating the Role of Social Value Orientation and Dispositional Trust.” Social Neuroscience 9 (1): 10–22.
APA
Emonds, G., Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., Seurinck, R., & Achten, R. (2014). Establishing cooperation in a mixed-motive social dilemma: an fMRI study investigating the role of social value orientation and dispositional trust. SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 9(1), 10–22.
Vancouver
1.
Emonds G, Declerck CH, Boone C, Seurinck R, Achten R. Establishing cooperation in a mixed-motive social dilemma: an fMRI study investigating the role of social value orientation and dispositional trust. SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE. 2014;9(1):10–22.
MLA
Emonds, Griet, Carolyn H Declerck, Christophe Boone, et al. “Establishing Cooperation in a Mixed-motive Social Dilemma: An fMRI Study Investigating the Role of Social Value Orientation and Dispositional Trust.” SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE 9.1 (2014): 10–22. Print.