Advanced search
1 file | 705.83 KB Add to list

Key characteristics for tool choice in indicator-based sustainability assessment at farm level

Author
Organization
Abstract
Although the literature on sustainability assessment tools to support decision making in agriculture is rapidly growing, little attention has been paid to the actual tool choice. We focused on the choice of more complex integrated indicator-based tools at the farm level. The objective was to determine key characteristics as criteria for tool choice. This was done with an in-depth comparison of 2 cases: the Monitoring Tool for Integrated Farm Sustainability and the Public Goods Tool. They differ in characteristics that may influence tool choice: data, time, and budgetary requirements. With an enhanced framework, we derived 11 key characteristics to describe differences between the case tools. Based on the key characteristics, we defined 2 types of indicator-based tools: full sustainability assessment (FSA) and rapid sustainability assessment (RSA). RSA tools are more oriented toward communicating and learning. They are therefore more suitable for use by a larger group of farmers, can help to raise awareness, trigger farmers to become interested in sustainable farming, and highlight areas of good or bad performance. If and when farmers increase their commitment to on-farm sustainability, they can gain additional insight by using an FSA tool. Based on complementary and modular use of the tools, practical recommendations for the different end users, i.e., researchers, farmers, advisers, and so forth, have been suggested.
Keywords
tool choice, INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT, sustainability assessment tool, rapid assessment, full assessment, farm level

Downloads

  • ES-2014-6876.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 705.83 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Marchand, Fleur et al. “Key Characteristics for Tool Choice in Indicator-based Sustainability Assessment at Farm Level.” ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY 19.3 (2014): n. pag. Print.
APA
Marchand, F., Debruyne, L., Triste, L., Gerrard, C., Padel, S., & Lauwers, L. (2014). Key characteristics for tool choice in indicator-based sustainability assessment at farm level. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 19(3).
Chicago author-date
Marchand, Fleur, Lies Debruyne, Laure Triste, Catherine Gerrard, Susanne Padel, and Ludwig Lauwers. 2014. “Key Characteristics for Tool Choice in Indicator-based Sustainability Assessment at Farm Level.” Ecology and Society 19 (3).
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Marchand, Fleur, Lies Debruyne, Laure Triste, Catherine Gerrard, Susanne Padel, and Ludwig Lauwers. 2014. “Key Characteristics for Tool Choice in Indicator-based Sustainability Assessment at Farm Level.” Ecology and Society 19 (3).
Vancouver
1.
Marchand F, Debruyne L, Triste L, Gerrard C, Padel S, Lauwers L. Key characteristics for tool choice in indicator-based sustainability assessment at farm level. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY. 2014;19(3).
IEEE
[1]
F. Marchand, L. Debruyne, L. Triste, C. Gerrard, S. Padel, and L. Lauwers, “Key characteristics for tool choice in indicator-based sustainability assessment at farm level,” ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, vol. 19, no. 3, 2014.
@article{5759619,
  abstract     = {Although the literature on sustainability assessment tools to support decision making in agriculture is rapidly growing, little attention has been paid to the actual tool choice. We focused on the choice of more complex integrated indicator-based tools at the farm level. The objective was to determine key characteristics as criteria for tool choice. This was done with an in-depth comparison of 2 cases: the Monitoring Tool for Integrated Farm Sustainability and the Public Goods Tool. They differ in characteristics that may influence tool choice: data, time, and budgetary requirements. With an enhanced framework, we derived 11 key characteristics to describe differences between the case tools. Based on the key characteristics, we defined 2 types of indicator-based tools: full sustainability assessment (FSA) and rapid sustainability assessment (RSA). RSA tools are more oriented toward communicating and learning. They are therefore more suitable for use by a larger group of farmers, can help to raise awareness, trigger farmers to become interested in sustainable farming, and highlight areas of good or bad performance. If and when farmers increase their commitment to on-farm sustainability, they can gain additional insight by using an FSA tool. Based on complementary and modular use of the tools, practical recommendations for the different end users, i.e., researchers, farmers, advisers, and so forth, have been suggested.},
  articleno    = {46},
  author       = {Marchand, Fleur and Debruyne, Lies and Triste, Laure and Gerrard, Catherine and Padel, Susanne and Lauwers, Ludwig},
  issn         = {1708-3087},
  journal      = {ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY},
  keywords     = {tool choice,INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT,sustainability assessment tool,rapid assessment,full assessment,farm level},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {10},
  title        = {Key characteristics for tool choice in indicator-based sustainability assessment at farm level},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06876-190346},
  volume       = {19},
  year         = {2014},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: