Advanced search

Physical versus chemical surface-modification approaches for PET: preliminary haemo- and bio-compatibility studies

Author
Organization
Keywords
haemocompatibility, HUVEC, cardiovascular, poly(ethylene terephthalate)

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Giol, Elena Diana, Ron E Unger, Sandra Van Vlierberghe, C James Kirkpartick, and Peter Dubruel. 2014. “Physical Versus Chemical Surface-modification Approaches for PET: Preliminary Haemo- and Bio-compatibility Studies.” In AMBA 2014 : Advanced Materials for Biomedical Applications.
APA
Giol, E. D., Unger, R. E., Van Vlierberghe, S., Kirkpartick, C. J., & Dubruel, P. (2014). Physical versus chemical surface-modification approaches for PET: preliminary haemo- and bio-compatibility studies. AMBA 2014 : advanced materials for biomedical applications. Presented at the Conference on Advanced Materials for Biomedical Applications (AMBA 2014).
Vancouver
1.
Giol ED, Unger RE, Van Vlierberghe S, Kirkpartick CJ, Dubruel P. Physical versus chemical surface-modification approaches for PET: preliminary haemo- and bio-compatibility studies. AMBA 2014 : advanced materials for biomedical applications. 2014.
MLA
Giol, Elena Diana, Ron E Unger, Sandra Van Vlierberghe, et al. “Physical Versus Chemical Surface-modification Approaches for PET: Preliminary Haemo- and Bio-compatibility Studies.” AMBA 2014 : Advanced Materials for Biomedical Applications. 2014. Print.
@inproceedings{5743843,
  author       = {Giol, Elena Diana and Unger, Ron E and Van Vlierberghe, Sandra and Kirkpartick, C James and Dubruel, Peter},
  booktitle    = {AMBA 2014 : advanced materials for biomedical applications},
  language     = {eng},
  location     = {Ghent, Belgium},
  title        = {Physical versus chemical surface-modification approaches for PET: preliminary haemo- and bio-compatibility studies},
  year         = {2014},
}