Advanced search
1 file | 1.96 MB Add to list

Does ASEM Work?

Author
Organization
Abstract
This CEPS Policy Brief is based on a larger study for the EEAS and European Commission, written by the same authors in the run-up of the Milan ASEM summit of 16-17 October 2014. The main idea of the study is to assess whether ASEM works and how, by verifying the factual evidence in detail. After all, ASEM has no institutions, no budget and no treaty, whilst dialogues and a loose improvement over time in Asia-Europe relations refer to process much more than genuine ‘results’. The stocktaking covers all ASEM activities since the 2006 Helsinki summit. Summit and foreign ministers’ declarations and ASEM calendar of activities (and interviews) are used to trace ASEM activities in the three ASEM pillars (political, economic, and peoples-to-peoples/cultural). All the ‘regular’ ASEM meetings at ministerial and other levels (many of which are only known to relatively few) have been mapped. Also the ASEM working methods, based on the 2000 AECF framework and many subsequent initiatives, have been scrutinised, including whether they are actually implemented or not or partially. Such methods refer to how to work together in areas of cooperation (beyond the typical ASEM dialogue), organisation, coordination and ASEM visibility. The main conclusion is that ASEM works reasonably well, once one accepts the ASEM of today, although some inefficiencies still characterise the ‘system’. There is a host of secondary conclusions on the three pillars, the foreign ministers, the strong government-to-government nature of ASEM and the working methods. We recommend that today’s ASEM needs no reform and that not having ASEM would entail political and diplomatic costs. We emphasise that ASEM is well placed to stimulate exchange of information between the mega-FTAs such as TPP, RCEP and TTIP.
Keywords
TTIP, RCEP, TPP, FTA, Asia-Europe relations, ASEM

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.96 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Pelkmans, Jacques, and Weinian Hu. “Does ASEM Work?” No. 321, 14 October 2014, Centre for European Policy Studies, 2014.
APA
Pelkmans, J., & Hu, W. (2014). Does ASEM Work? Brussels, Belgium: Centre for European Policy Studies.
Chicago author-date
Pelkmans, Jacques, and Weinian Hu. 2014. “Does ASEM Work?” No. 321, 14 October 2014. Brussels, Belgium: Centre for European Policy Studies.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Pelkmans, Jacques, and Weinian Hu. 2014. “Does ASEM Work?” No. 321, 14 October 2014. Brussels, Belgium: Centre for European Policy Studies.
Vancouver
1.
Pelkmans J, Hu W. Does ASEM Work? No. 321, 14 October 2014. Brussels, Belgium: Centre for European Policy Studies; 2014.
IEEE
[1]
J. Pelkmans and W. Hu, “Does ASEM Work?,” No. 321, 14 October 2014. Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
@misc{5730104,
  abstract     = {{This CEPS Policy Brief is based on a larger study for the EEAS and European Commission, written by the same authors in the run-up of the Milan ASEM summit of 16-17 October 2014. The main idea of the study is to assess whether ASEM works and how, by verifying the factual evidence in detail. After all, ASEM has no institutions, no budget and no treaty, whilst dialogues and a loose improvement over time in Asia-Europe relations refer to process much more than genuine ‘results’. The stocktaking covers all ASEM activities since the 2006 Helsinki summit. Summit and foreign ministers’ declarations and ASEM calendar of activities (and interviews) are used to trace ASEM activities in the three ASEM pillars (political, economic, and peoples-to-peoples/cultural). All the ‘regular’ ASEM meetings at ministerial and other levels (many of which are only known to relatively few) have been mapped. Also the ASEM working methods, based on the 2000 AECF framework and many subsequent initiatives, have been scrutinised, including whether they are actually implemented or not or partially. Such methods refer to how to work together in areas of cooperation (beyond the typical ASEM dialogue), organisation, coordination and ASEM visibility. The main conclusion is that ASEM works reasonably well, once one accepts the ASEM of today, although some inefficiencies still characterise the ‘system’. There is a host of secondary conclusions on the three pillars, the foreign ministers, the strong government-to-government nature of ASEM and the working methods. We recommend that today’s ASEM needs no reform and that not having ASEM would entail political and diplomatic costs. We emphasise that ASEM is well placed to stimulate exchange of information between the mega-FTAs such as TPP, RCEP and TTIP.}},
  author       = {{Pelkmans, Jacques and Hu, Weinian}},
  keywords     = {{TTIP,RCEP,TPP,FTA,Asia-Europe relations,ASEM}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{15}},
  publisher    = {{Centre for European Policy Studies}},
  series       = {{No. 321, 14 October 2014}},
  title        = {{Does ASEM Work?}},
  url          = {{http://ssrn.com/author=2313205}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}