Innovation is created by humans, not by systems: an exploration of user involvement in living labs: user motivation versus lead user criteria
- Author
- Sara Logghe (UGent) , Kathy Oelbrandt and Dimitri Schuurman (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- The past few years companies have become more interested in involving users during the production process of their products. On the other hand, a group of users started to innovate on their own. Users also became interested in becoming part of the production processes themselves. Certain users experience certain needs earlier than others and they enjoy finding solutions for these needs. They are called Lead Users (von Hippel, 2005). Living Labs are one possibility for users to realize this interest to innovate. iLab.o, the Living Lab division of iMinds, has been organizing Living Lab research since 2009. To get a better view on the motivations of this panel, we analyzed the behavior of the involved users from September 2009 to December 2013. We tried to detect Lead Users, but it is not obvious to define people as Lead Users because of the different used definitions. Instead, we divided this panel into three types of users based on the intensity of their involvement: passive, sleeping and active users. A small group of users is extremely active and are been defined as “alpha users”. Based on interviews with these alpha users in November and December 2013, a better view on their motivations to keep participating in Living Lab research was made. In this paper we focus on the participation of these different user types in one research phase type within Living Lab research, more specifically co-creation sessions. By means of a comparative case study, we tried to get a better understanding of the behavior of the different user types. It became clear that in order to keep the panel involved it is important to focus on community building.
Downloads
-
Logghe et al. Innovation is created by humans.pdf
- full text
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 281.25 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-5722003
- MLA
- Logghe, Sara, et al. “Innovation Is Created by Humans, Not by Systems: An Exploration of User Involvement in Living Labs: User Motivation versus Lead User Criteria.” OpenLivingLab Days 2014, Proceedings, 2014.
- APA
- Logghe, S., Oelbrandt, K., & Schuurman, D. (2014). Innovation is created by humans, not by systems: an exploration of user involvement in living labs: user motivation versus lead user criteria. OpenLivingLab Days 2014, Proceedings. Presented at the OpenLivingLab Days 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Chicago author-date
- Logghe, Sara, Kathy Oelbrandt, and Dimitri Schuurman. 2014. “Innovation Is Created by Humans, Not by Systems: An Exploration of User Involvement in Living Labs: User Motivation versus Lead User Criteria.” In OpenLivingLab Days 2014, Proceedings.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Logghe, Sara, Kathy Oelbrandt, and Dimitri Schuurman. 2014. “Innovation Is Created by Humans, Not by Systems: An Exploration of User Involvement in Living Labs: User Motivation versus Lead User Criteria.” In OpenLivingLab Days 2014, Proceedings.
- Vancouver
- 1.Logghe S, Oelbrandt K, Schuurman D. Innovation is created by humans, not by systems: an exploration of user involvement in living labs: user motivation versus lead user criteria. In: OpenLivingLab Days 2014, Proceedings. 2014.
- IEEE
- [1]S. Logghe, K. Oelbrandt, and D. Schuurman, “Innovation is created by humans, not by systems: an exploration of user involvement in living labs: user motivation versus lead user criteria,” in OpenLivingLab Days 2014, Proceedings, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014.
@inproceedings{5722003, abstract = {{The past few years companies have become more interested in involving users during the production process of their products. On the other hand, a group of users started to innovate on their own. Users also became interested in becoming part of the production processes themselves. Certain users experience certain needs earlier than others and they enjoy finding solutions for these needs. They are called Lead Users (von Hippel, 2005). Living Labs are one possibility for users to realize this interest to innovate. iLab.o, the Living Lab division of iMinds, has been organizing Living Lab research since 2009. To get a better view on the motivations of this panel, we analyzed the behavior of the involved users from September 2009 to December 2013. We tried to detect Lead Users, but it is not obvious to define people as Lead Users because of the different used definitions. Instead, we divided this panel into three types of users based on the intensity of their involvement: passive, sleeping and active users. A small group of users is extremely active and are been defined as “alpha users”. Based on interviews with these alpha users in November and December 2013, a better view on their motivations to keep participating in Living Lab research was made. In this paper we focus on the participation of these different user types in one research phase type within Living Lab research, more specifically co-creation sessions. By means of a comparative case study, we tried to get a better understanding of the behavior of the different user types. It became clear that in order to keep the panel involved it is important to focus on community building.}}, author = {{Logghe, Sara and Oelbrandt, Kathy and Schuurman, Dimitri}}, booktitle = {{OpenLivingLab Days 2014, Proceedings}}, language = {{eng}}, location = {{Amsterdam, The Netherlands}}, title = {{Innovation is created by humans, not by systems: an exploration of user involvement in living labs: user motivation versus lead user criteria}}, year = {{2014}}, }