Advanced search
1 file | 329.21 KB Add to list

The impact of communicating conflicting risk and benefit messages: an experimental study on red meat information

Author
Organization
Keywords
UNCERTAINTY, CREDIBILITY, MEDIA, PERCEPTIONS, CONSUMPTION, FISH, Risks, Red meat, Conflicting information, Communication, Benefits, NUTRITION MESSAGES, FOOD, MANAGEMENT, CONSUMER RESPONSES

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 329.21 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Regan, Áine, Áine McConnon, Margôt Kuttschreuter, et al. “The Impact of Communicating Conflicting Risk and Benefit Messages: An Experimental Study on Red Meat Information.” FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE 38 (2014): 107–114. Print.
APA
Regan, Á., McConnon, Á., Kuttschreuter, M., Rutsaert, P., Shan, L., Pieniak, Z., Barnett, J., et al. (2014). The impact of communicating conflicting risk and benefit messages: an experimental study on red meat information. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 38, 107–114.
Chicago author-date
Regan, Áine, Áine McConnon, Margôt Kuttschreuter, Pieter Rutsaert, Liran Shan, Zuzanna Pieniak, Julie Barnett, Wim Verbeke, and Patrick Wall. 2014. “The Impact of Communicating Conflicting Risk and Benefit Messages: An Experimental Study on Red Meat Information.” Food Quality and Preference 38: 107–114.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Regan, Áine, Áine McConnon, Margôt Kuttschreuter, Pieter Rutsaert, Liran Shan, Zuzanna Pieniak, Julie Barnett, Wim Verbeke, and Patrick Wall. 2014. “The Impact of Communicating Conflicting Risk and Benefit Messages: An Experimental Study on Red Meat Information.” Food Quality and Preference 38: 107–114.
Vancouver
1.
Regan Á, McConnon Á, Kuttschreuter M, Rutsaert P, Shan L, Pieniak Z, et al. The impact of communicating conflicting risk and benefit messages: an experimental study on red meat information. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE. 2014;38:107–14.
IEEE
[1]
Á. Regan et al., “The impact of communicating conflicting risk and benefit messages: an experimental study on red meat information,” FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, vol. 38, pp. 107–114, 2014.
@article{5695724,
  author       = {Regan, Áine and McConnon, Áine and Kuttschreuter, Margôt and Rutsaert, Pieter and Shan, Liran and Pieniak, Zuzanna and Barnett, Julie and Verbeke, Wim and Wall, Patrick},
  issn         = {0950-3293},
  journal      = {FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE},
  keywords     = {UNCERTAINTY,CREDIBILITY,MEDIA,PERCEPTIONS,CONSUMPTION,FISH,Risks,Red meat,Conflicting information,Communication,Benefits,NUTRITION MESSAGES,FOOD,MANAGEMENT,CONSUMER RESPONSES},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {107--114},
  title        = {The impact of communicating conflicting risk and benefit messages: an experimental study on red meat information},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.05.019},
  volume       = {38},
  year         = {2014},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: