Advanced search
Add to list

Thought suppression in obese and non-obese restrained eaters: piece of cake or forbidden fruit.

Author
Organization
Abstract
Objective: This article examines thought suppression tendencies in restrained eaters. Furthermore, the dynamics between failing thought suppression and thought control strategies are explored. Methods: One hundred and five overweight and normal-weight boys and girls (12-18 years) participated in a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. A distinction was made between disinhibited restrained eaters (high restraint/high disinhibition), inhibited restrained eaters (high restraint/low disinhibition) and unrestrained eaters (low restraint) in both weight-groups. The Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) was used to select the different groups of (un)restrained eaters. The White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI) was employed to measure thought suppression and intrusions. The Thought Control Questionnaire (TCQ) was used to measure thought control strategies (distraction, punishment, reappraisal, worry, social control). Results: The disinhibited restrainers obtained meaningfully higher scores on WBSI-total, WBSI-thought suppression and WBSI-intrusion than the inhibited restrainers and unrestrained eaters in both weight groups. Those who scored high on WBSI-total, obtained significantly higher scores on the TCQ subscales distraction, worry and punishment, than those who scored low on WBSI-total. Discussion: The findings suggest that disinhibited restrainers, irrespective of their weight status, report a high tendency to suppress thoughts. Given Wegner's theoretical account, this may be associated with preoccupations and self-control difficulties. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
Keywords
INVENTORY, BULIMIA-NERVOSA, UNWANTED THOUGHTS, DIETARY RESTRAINT, INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES, MENTAL CONTROL, FOOD-RELATED STIMULI, dietary restraint, thought suppression, thought control, FAILURE, DIETERS, BEHAVIOR

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Soetens, Barbara, et al. “Thought Suppression in Obese and Non-Obese Restrained Eaters: Piece of Cake or Forbidden Fruit.” European Eating Disorders Review, vol. 16, no. 1, Wiley, 2008, pp. 67–76.
APA
Soetens, B., Braet, C., & Moens, E. (2008). Thought suppression in obese and non-obese restrained eaters: piece of cake or forbidden fruit. European Eating Disorders Review, 16(1), 67–76.
Chicago author-date
Soetens, Barbara, Caroline Braet, and Ellen Moens. 2008. “Thought Suppression in Obese and Non-Obese Restrained Eaters: Piece of Cake or Forbidden Fruit.” European Eating Disorders Review 16 (1): 67–76.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Soetens, Barbara, Caroline Braet, and Ellen Moens. 2008. “Thought Suppression in Obese and Non-Obese Restrained Eaters: Piece of Cake or Forbidden Fruit.” European Eating Disorders Review 16 (1): 67–76.
Vancouver
1.
Soetens B, Braet C, Moens E. Thought suppression in obese and non-obese restrained eaters: piece of cake or forbidden fruit. European Eating Disorders Review. 2008;16(1):67–76.
IEEE
[1]
B. Soetens, C. Braet, and E. Moens, “Thought suppression in obese and non-obese restrained eaters: piece of cake or forbidden fruit.,” European Eating Disorders Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2008.
@article{537363,
  abstract     = {{Objective: This article examines thought suppression tendencies in restrained eaters. Furthermore, the dynamics between failing thought suppression and thought control strategies are explored.

Methods: One hundred and five overweight and normal-weight boys and girls (12-18 years) participated in a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. A distinction was made between disinhibited restrained eaters (high restraint/high disinhibition), inhibited restrained eaters (high restraint/low disinhibition) and unrestrained eaters (low restraint) in both weight-groups. The Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) was used to select the different groups of (un)restrained eaters. The White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI) was employed to measure thought suppression and intrusions. The Thought Control Questionnaire (TCQ) was used to measure thought control strategies (distraction, punishment, reappraisal, worry, social control).

Results: The disinhibited restrainers obtained meaningfully higher scores on WBSI-total, WBSI-thought suppression and WBSI-intrusion than the inhibited restrainers and unrestrained eaters in both weight groups. Those who scored high on WBSI-total, obtained significantly higher scores on the TCQ subscales distraction, worry and punishment, than those who scored low on WBSI-total.

Discussion: The findings suggest that disinhibited restrainers, irrespective of their weight status, report a high tendency to suppress thoughts. Given Wegner's theoretical account, this may be associated with preoccupations and self-control difficulties. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.}},
  author       = {{Soetens, Barbara and Braet, Caroline and Moens, Ellen}},
  issn         = {{1072-4133}},
  journal      = {{European Eating Disorders Review}},
  keywords     = {{INVENTORY,BULIMIA-NERVOSA,UNWANTED THOUGHTS,DIETARY RESTRAINT,INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES,MENTAL CONTROL,FOOD-RELATED STIMULI,dietary restraint,thought suppression,thought control,FAILURE,DIETERS,BEHAVIOR}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{67--76}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{Thought suppression in obese and non-obese restrained eaters: piece of cake or forbidden fruit.}},
  volume       = {{16}},
  year         = {{2008}},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: