Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gastric banding in morbidly obese patients
(2008) Obesity Surgery. 18(6). p.680-685- abstract
- Background There are no guidelines on ventilation modes in morbidly obese patients. We investigated the effects of volume-controlled (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and cardiovascular responses in laparoscopic gastric banding procedures. Methods After Institutional Review Board approval, 24 adult consenting patients scheduled for laparoscopic gastric banding were studied. Anesthesia was standardized using remifentanil, propofol, rocuronium, and sevoflurane. All patients started with VCV with a tidal volume of 10 ml kg(-1) ideal body weight, respiratory rate adjusted to obtain an end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35-40 mmHg, positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH(2)O, an inspiratory pause of 10% and an inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1:2. Fifteen minutes after pneumoperitoneum, the patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In Group VCV (n=12), ventilation was with the same parameters. In Group PCV (n=12), the airway pressure was set to provide a tidal volume of 10 ml kg(-1) ideal body weight without exceeding 35 cm H2O. Respiratory rate was adjusted to keep an end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35-40 mmHg. Arterial blood samples were drawn after surgical positioning and 15 min after allocation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis. Results With constant minute ventilation, VCV generates equal airway pressures and cardiovascular effects with a lower Pa-CO2 as compared to PCV (42.5 (5.2) mmHg versus 48.9 (4.3) mmHg, p < 0.01 ANOVA). Arterial oxygenation remained unchanged. Conclusion VCV and PCV appear to be an equally suited ventilatory technique for laparoscopic procedures in morbidly obese patients. Carbon dioxide elimination is more efficient when using VCV.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-528897
- author
- Luc De Baerdemaeker UGent, C. Van der Herten, MARC GILLARDIN JEAN UGent, Piet Pattyn UGent, Eric Mortier UGent and Laszlo L Szegedi UGent
- organization
- year
- 2008
- type
- journalArticle (original)
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keyword
- GAS-EXCHANGE, TIDAL VOLUME, RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME, effects, INVERSE RATIO VENTILATION, cardiovascular system, elimination, carbon dioxide, partial pressure oxygen, laparoscopy, surgery, ventilation, mechanics, DEAD SPACE, I/E RATIOS, OXYGENATION, MECHANICS, SURGERY, ANESTHESIA
- journal title
- Obesity Surgery
- Obes. Surg.
- volume
- 18
- issue
- 6
- pages
- 680 - 685
- publisher
- Springer
- place of publication
- 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA
- conference name
- Euroanaesthesia 2005 Meeting
- conference location
- Vienna, AUSTRIA,
- conference start
- 2005-05-28
- conference end
- 2005-05-31
- Web of Science type
- Proceedings Paper
- Web of Science id
- 000255631000011
- JCR category
- SURGERY
- JCR impact factor
- 2.913 (2008)
- JCR rank
- 23/148 (2008)
- JCR quartile
- 1 (2008)
- ISSN
- 0960-8923
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11695-007-9376-8
- language
- English
- UGent publication?
- yes
- classification
- A1
- copyright statement
- I have retained and own the full copyright for this publication
- id
- 528897
- handle
- http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-528897
- date created
- 2009-03-24 09:39:13
- date last changed
- 2017-01-02 09:55:33
@article{528897, abstract = {Background There are no guidelines on ventilation modes in morbidly obese patients. We investigated the effects of volume-controlled (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and cardiovascular responses in laparoscopic gastric banding procedures. Methods After Institutional Review Board approval, 24 adult consenting patients scheduled for laparoscopic gastric banding were studied. Anesthesia was standardized using remifentanil, propofol, rocuronium, and sevoflurane. All patients started with VCV with a tidal volume of 10 ml kg(-1) ideal body weight, respiratory rate adjusted to obtain an end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35-40 mmHg, positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH(2)O, an inspiratory pause of 10\% and an inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1:2. Fifteen minutes after pneumoperitoneum, the patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In Group VCV (n=12), ventilation was with the same parameters. In Group PCV (n=12), the airway pressure was set to provide a tidal volume of 10 ml kg(-1) ideal body weight without exceeding 35 cm H2O. Respiratory rate was adjusted to keep an end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35-40 mmHg. Arterial blood samples were drawn after surgical positioning and 15 min after allocation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis. Results With constant minute ventilation, VCV generates equal airway pressures and cardiovascular effects with a lower Pa-CO2 as compared to PCV (42.5 (5.2) mmHg versus 48.9 (4.3) mmHg, p {\textlangle} 0.01 ANOVA). Arterial oxygenation remained unchanged. Conclusion VCV and PCV appear to be an equally suited ventilatory technique for laparoscopic procedures in morbidly obese patients. Carbon dioxide elimination is more efficient when using VCV.}, author = {De Baerdemaeker, Luc and Van der Herten, C. and GILLARDIN JEAN, MARC and Pattyn, Piet and Mortier, Eric and Szegedi, Laszlo L}, issn = {0960-8923}, journal = {Obesity Surgery}, keyword = {GAS-EXCHANGE,TIDAL VOLUME,RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME,effects,INVERSE RATIO VENTILATION,cardiovascular system,elimination,carbon dioxide,partial pressure oxygen,laparoscopy,surgery,ventilation,mechanics,DEAD SPACE,I/E RATIOS,OXYGENATION,MECHANICS,SURGERY,ANESTHESIA}, language = {eng}, location = {Vienna, AUSTRIA,}, number = {6}, pages = {680--685}, publisher = {Springer}, title = {Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gastric banding in morbidly obese patients}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9376-8}, volume = {18}, year = {2008}, }
- Chicago
- De Baerdemaeker, Luc, C. Van der Herten, MARC GILLARDIN JEAN, Piet Pattyn, Eric Mortier, and Laszlo L Szegedi. 2008. “Comparison of Volume-controlled and Pressure-controlled Ventilation During Laparoscopic Gastric Banding in Morbidly Obese Patients.” Obesity Surgery 18 (6): 680–685.
- APA
- De Baerdemaeker, L., Van der Herten, C., GILLARDIN JEAN, M., Pattyn, P., Mortier, E., & Szegedi, L. L. (2008). Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gastric banding in morbidly obese patients. Obesity Surgery, 18(6), 680–685. Presented at the Euroanaesthesia 2005 Meeting.
- Vancouver
- 1.De Baerdemaeker L, Van der Herten C, GILLARDIN JEAN M, Pattyn P, Mortier E, Szegedi LL. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gastric banding in morbidly obese patients. Obesity Surgery. 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA: Springer; 2008;18(6):680–5.
- MLA
- De Baerdemaeker, Luc, C. Van der Herten, MARC GILLARDIN JEAN, et al. “Comparison of Volume-controlled and Pressure-controlled Ventilation During Laparoscopic Gastric Banding in Morbidly Obese Patients.” Obesity Surgery 18.6 (2008): 680–685. Print.