Advanced search
1 file | 9.33 MB Add to list

Renegotiating communal autonomy: communal land rights and liberal land reform on the Bolivian altiplano: Carangas, 1860-1930

Hanne Cottyn (UGent)
(2014)
Author
Promoter
(UGent)
Organization
Project
The end of peasant societies in an historical and comparative perspective.
Abstract
This dissertation is the result of a detailed analysis of the local dynamics generated in the context of an anti-corporatist land reform in a rural region marked by a strong communal control over land. The presented case study is informed by a broader analytical framework that allows for a critical assessment of peripheral agency within a globalizing world. With this research, I aim to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of global-local interactions in which local actors, and particularly rural communities, creatively re-negotiate the terms of their participation and autonomy in the face of state- and market-driven integration processes. This ambition leads to the question of how trajectories of rural transition are shaped by the course of world-systemic expansion and, the other way around, how processes of globalization are “fuelled” by local dynamics of rural change. Do these local-global entanglements constellate a more homogeneous world, or do they feed new trends of ? My assessment of that question seeks to grasp how autonomous spaces for communal organization have been asserted or enclosed throughout the cycles of world-systemic contraction and expansion. In view of the historical oscillations in the erosion and renewal of such spaces, it interrogates the assets and potentials but also the vulnerabilities of communal agency. I address the question on rural change and communal autonomy from the angle of land rights and the imposition of standardized land rights. This process of commodification will be specified for the rural Andes, where the outcome of centuries-long processes of colonial exploitation and post-colonial extractivism entails a remarkable (yet over the centuries increasingly more defied) “margin” for the safeguarding of communal land control. Why could such rights be preserved in certain regions? How were these rights safeguarded throughout cycles of land rights commodification? What implications did this have on the longer term? I confine my examination of these questions to Bolivia’s first land reform project launched by under the name of Exvinculación, referring to the Alienation Act of 1874. This reform emblematizes a longer and conflictive process of liberal legislation and rural transformation that subjected communal autonomy and land rights security to an enclosure operation. The central story of this research, however, tells more about the enclosure’s standstill rather than its advance. The province of Carangas, entirely located on the altiplano (Andean High Plateau), was one of the few rural zones where the land reform made no headway. While this is mainly explained by the region’s protracted marginalization and its little attractive soil for agricultural entrepreneurs, the premise of my research urges to look beyond ecological and demographic factors. The two guiding questions of my enquiry are why and how the imposed land rights reorganization of customary land systems and the related break-up of communities was kept at bay in Carangas; and what impact this had on social power relations on the long term. This assessment is based on extensive archive research as well as field work in several villages of the former province. This combination of methods allowed me to dissect the most local levels of organizing life in Carangas. The dissertation is structured by three parts. In the first part, I present the theoretical framework of my research, constructed around the notion of “frontier” and “frontier zones”. On basis of these building blocks, the first chapter proposes a “frontier perspective” as an approach towards local-global interactions in terms of a dynamic process of incorporation that has a spatial repercussion, reflected in the formation of a “frontier zone” where differently organized groups and regions come into sustained contact. The second chapter relates the movement of frontiers and the creation of frontier zones to the historical incorporation trajectory of the rural Andes and detects the “communal” as the essential framework for strategies to enter in “negotiation” with state and market actors. This “negotiated peripherality” is based on the determination and ability of community-bound actors to participate in broader structures for exchange and regulation and simultaneous secure a margin for communal modes of production and governance. In the second part of the dissertation I reconstruct the particular setting of this incorporation process. Chapter three gives insight into how rural life in Carangas is organized within a social agro-pastoralist framework on basis of land, labour and livestock management, and how people and resources are brought into circulation through a “complex exchange chain.” Chapter four assesses how local production, exchange and regulation was bound by a fiscal-legal land system, local practices and interregional patterns for exchange and mobility, and elite intermediation. The third and last part comprises the case study, focusing on the land reform experience of the communities of the Carangas province between 1860 and 1930. Chapter five explains how, nurtured by new liberal ideas on land and property, a disentailment legislation was debated and designed. While envisioning a capitalist transition of community-bound indigenous population into a smallholder class, the reform process rather nurtured the expansion of the hacienda complex, meanwhile triggering a strong reaction on part of the communities. Through a threefold resistance strategy of legal action, political lobbying and violent confrontation, they obtained important concessions for communal land tenure, thereby destabilizing the legislation. The last two chapters give a detailed reconstruction of how this process reverberated in the communities of Carangas. The analysis presented in chapter six demonstrates that already under the land reform decrees preceding the mentioned Act, the communities secured their exemption from the decrees via a fiscal arrangement. Meanwhile, however, they lost their direct control over complementary valley lands. When disentailment was brought into operation, from the 1880s on, the announcement of a land inspection to implement the law fostered rebellious reactions against that intervention as well as a raise in inter-community conflicts over land. The threat posed by the altered legislation instigated the cooperation among community leaders to formulate a joint response, which involved the forging of strategic inter-ethnic alliances, erupting in a widespread rebellion during the 1899 federal war. Chapter seven continues with the post-1899 context, indicating how pressures on the land and the extractable resources it entailed increased, but the province’s commodity frontiers proved rather immobile. With regards to the land reform, pressures to introduce the new legislation got bogged down in endless delay, converting the province in one of the few completely hacienda-free regions of the Bolivian countryside. This went together with increasing internal conflict, communal mobilization, and strong but very ambiguous elite intervention. Special attention is given to this ambiguity, detecting a shared interest in the defence of communal lands that resulted from a gradual process of simultaneous usurpation and integration on part of the village elites. The chapter closes by explaining how the role of provincial elites nurtured a shift in the national discourse on the indigenous population, signalling the adoption of an integration policy. In short, the presented analysis tests the general hypothesis that processes of globalization nurture a diversity of transformation trajectories and that these diverse local processes “nourish” the global expansive-contractive course of capitalist developments by assessing the effects of a land-commodifying reform process in a region where most of the land was ánd remained subject to communal control. It demonstrates that “exemption” from the effects of such process is not merely a matter of isolation but is actively “extorted” in a dynamic renegotiation process. From a frontier perspective, the way in which a commodifying legislation was floored through communal action reflects the operation of feedback loops in the expansive course of world-systemic developments. The result is a thwarted incorporation process, visible in the constant (re)creation and assertion of alternative spaces for communal autonomy.
Keywords
20th century, 19th century, Land Reform, Land Rights, Indigenous Communities, Peasants, Bolivia, Andes, World History, Frontiers

Downloads

  • Cottyn PhD 2014-withcover.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 9.33 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Cottyn, Hanne. “Renegotiating Communal Autonomy: Communal Land Rights and Liberal Land Reform on the Bolivian Altiplano: Carangas, 1860-1930.” 2014 : n. pag. Print.
APA
Cottyn, H. (2014). Renegotiating communal autonomy: communal land rights and liberal land reform on the Bolivian altiplano: Carangas, 1860-1930. Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent, Belgium.
Chicago author-date
Cottyn, Hanne. 2014. “Renegotiating Communal Autonomy: Communal Land Rights and Liberal Land Reform on the Bolivian Altiplano: Carangas, 1860-1930”. Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Cottyn, Hanne. 2014. “Renegotiating Communal Autonomy: Communal Land Rights and Liberal Land Reform on the Bolivian Altiplano: Carangas, 1860-1930”. Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy.
Vancouver
1.
Cottyn H. Renegotiating communal autonomy: communal land rights and liberal land reform on the Bolivian altiplano: Carangas, 1860-1930. [Ghent, Belgium]: Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy; 2014.
IEEE
[1]
H. Cottyn, “Renegotiating communal autonomy: communal land rights and liberal land reform on the Bolivian altiplano: Carangas, 1860-1930,” Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent, Belgium, 2014.
@phdthesis{4432196,
  abstract     = {This dissertation is the result of a detailed analysis of the local dynamics generated in the context of an anti-corporatist land reform in a rural region marked by a strong communal control over land. The presented case study is informed by a broader analytical framework that allows for a critical assessment of peripheral agency within a globalizing world. With this research, I aim to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of global-local interactions in which local actors, and particularly rural communities, creatively re-negotiate the terms of their participation and autonomy in the face of state- and market-driven integration processes. This ambition leads to the question of how trajectories of rural transition are shaped by the course of world-systemic expansion and, the other way around, how processes of globalization are “fuelled” by local dynamics of rural change. Do these local-global entanglements constellate a more homogeneous world, or do they feed new trends of ? My assessment of that question seeks to grasp how autonomous spaces for communal organization have been asserted or enclosed throughout the cycles of world-systemic contraction and expansion. In view of the historical oscillations in the erosion and renewal of such spaces, it interrogates the assets and potentials but also the vulnerabilities of communal agency.
I address the question on rural change and communal autonomy from the angle of land rights and the imposition of standardized land rights. This process of commodification will be specified for the rural Andes, where the outcome of centuries-long processes of colonial exploitation and post-colonial extractivism entails a remarkable (yet over the centuries increasingly more defied) “margin” for the safeguarding of communal land control. Why could such rights be preserved in certain regions? How were these rights safeguarded throughout cycles of land rights commodification? What implications did this have on the longer term? 
I confine my examination of these questions to Bolivia’s first land reform project launched by under the name of Exvinculación, referring to the Alienation Act of 1874. This reform emblematizes a longer and conflictive process of liberal legislation and rural transformation that subjected communal autonomy and land rights security to an enclosure operation. The central story of this research, however, tells more about the enclosure’s standstill rather than its advance. The province of Carangas, entirely located on the altiplano (Andean High Plateau), was one of the few rural zones where the land reform made no headway. While this is mainly explained by the region’s protracted marginalization and its little attractive soil for agricultural entrepreneurs, the premise of my research urges to look beyond ecological and demographic factors. The two guiding questions of my enquiry are why and how the imposed land rights reorganization of customary land systems and the related break-up of communities was kept at bay in Carangas; and what impact this had on social power relations on the long term. This assessment is based on extensive archive research as well as field work in several villages of the former province. This combination of methods allowed me to dissect the most local levels of organizing life in Carangas. 
The dissertation is structured by three parts. In the first part, I present the theoretical framework of my research, constructed around the notion of “frontier” and “frontier zones”. On basis of these building blocks, the first chapter proposes a “frontier perspective” as an approach towards local-global interactions in terms of a dynamic process of incorporation that has a spatial repercussion, reflected in the formation of a “frontier zone” where differently organized groups and regions come into sustained contact. The second chapter relates the movement of frontiers and the creation of frontier zones to the historical incorporation trajectory of the rural Andes and detects the “communal” as the essential framework for strategies to enter in “negotiation” with state and market actors. This “negotiated peripherality” is based on the determination and ability of community-bound actors to participate in broader structures for exchange and regulation and simultaneous secure a margin for communal modes of production and governance. 
In the second part of the dissertation I reconstruct the particular setting of this incorporation process. Chapter  three gives insight into how rural life in Carangas is organized within a social agro-pastoralist framework on basis of land, labour and livestock management, and how people and resources are brought into circulation through a “complex exchange chain.” Chapter four assesses how local production, exchange and regulation was bound by a fiscal-legal land system, local practices and interregional patterns for exchange and mobility, and elite intermediation.
The third and last part comprises the case study, focusing on the land reform experience of the communities of the Carangas province between 1860 and 1930. Chapter five explains how, nurtured by new liberal ideas on land and property, a disentailment legislation was debated and designed. While envisioning a capitalist transition of community-bound indigenous population into a smallholder class, the reform process rather nurtured the expansion of the hacienda complex, meanwhile triggering a strong reaction on part of the communities. Through a threefold resistance strategy of legal action, political lobbying and violent confrontation, they obtained important concessions for communal land tenure, thereby destabilizing the legislation. 
The last two chapters give a detailed reconstruction of how this process reverberated in the communities of Carangas. The analysis presented in chapter six demonstrates that already under the land reform decrees preceding the mentioned Act, the communities secured their exemption from the decrees via a fiscal arrangement. Meanwhile, however, they lost their direct control over complementary valley lands. When disentailment was brought into operation, from the 1880s on, the announcement of a land inspection to implement the law fostered rebellious reactions against that intervention as well as a raise in inter-community conflicts over land. The threat posed by the altered legislation instigated the cooperation among community leaders to formulate a joint response, which involved the forging of strategic inter-ethnic alliances, erupting in a widespread rebellion during the 1899 federal war. Chapter seven continues with the post-1899 context, indicating how pressures on the land and the extractable resources it entailed increased, but the province’s commodity frontiers proved rather immobile. With regards to the land reform, pressures to introduce the new legislation got bogged down in endless delay, converting the province in one of the few completely hacienda-free regions of the Bolivian countryside.
This went together with increasing internal conflict, communal mobilization, and strong but very ambiguous elite intervention. Special attention is given to this ambiguity, detecting a shared interest in the defence of communal lands that resulted from a gradual process of simultaneous usurpation and  integration on part of the village elites. The chapter closes by explaining how the role of provincial elites nurtured a shift in the national discourse on the indigenous population, signalling  the adoption of an integration policy.
In short, the presented analysis tests the general hypothesis that processes of globalization nurture a diversity of transformation trajectories and that these diverse local processes “nourish” the global expansive-contractive course of capitalist developments by assessing the effects of a land-commodifying reform process in a region where most of the land was ánd remained subject to communal control. It demonstrates that “exemption” from the effects of such process is not merely a matter of isolation but is actively “extorted” in a dynamic renegotiation process. From a frontier perspective, the way in which a commodifying legislation was floored through communal action reflects the operation of feedback loops in the expansive course of world-systemic developments. The result is a thwarted incorporation process, visible in the constant (re)creation and assertion of alternative spaces for communal autonomy.},
  author       = {Cottyn, Hanne},
  keywords     = {20th century,19th century,Land Reform,Land Rights,Indigenous Communities,Peasants,Bolivia,Andes,World History,Frontiers},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {XXI, 467},
  publisher    = {Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy},
  school       = {Ghent University},
  title        = {Renegotiating communal autonomy: communal land rights and liberal land reform on the Bolivian altiplano: Carangas, 1860-1930},
  url          = {https://www.academia.edu/7485351/Renegotiating_communal_autonomy_dissertation},
  year         = {2014},
}