Advanced search
1 file | 252.56 KB Add to list

Face veil bans in the European Court of Human Rights: the importance of empirical findings

Eva Brems (UGent)
(2014) JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY. 22(2). p.517-551
Author
Organization
Project
  • ECHR (Strengthening the European Court of Human Rights: More Accountability through better legal reasoning)
Abstract
First, this Article will set out the facts and context of face veil bans in Europe and the legal challenges surrounding them. Then, the Article will explain the legal criteria that will be used by the European Court of Human Rights when deciding on this issue. Next, in its central argument, this Article will discuss the possible outcome of S.A.S. v. France, by assessing whether the arguments advanced by European governments to ban face veils can pass the human rights test instituted by the court. This assessment will rely on the court’s case law, as well as on the case file of the case currently pending before it. It will also include the results of empirical research conducted among women wearing face veils in Europe and analyze whether the government’s claims are consistent with those empirical studies.
Keywords
ECHR, face veil ban, HRC

Downloads

  • 2014.06.10 BremsJLP.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 252.56 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Brems, Eva. “Face Veil Bans in the European Court of Human Rights: The Importance of Empirical Findings.” JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY, edited by David Giller, vol. 22, no. 2, 2014, pp. 517–51.
APA
Brems, E. (2014). Face veil bans in the European Court of Human Rights: the importance of empirical findings. JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY, 22(2), 517–551.
Chicago author-date
Brems, Eva. 2014. “Face Veil Bans in the European Court of Human Rights: The Importance of Empirical Findings.” Edited by David Giller. JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY 22 (2): 517–51.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Brems, Eva. 2014. “Face Veil Bans in the European Court of Human Rights: The Importance of Empirical Findings.” Ed by. David Giller. JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY 22 (2): 517–551.
Vancouver
1.
Brems E. Face veil bans in the European Court of Human Rights: the importance of empirical findings. Giller D, editor. JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY. 2014;22(2):517–51.
IEEE
[1]
E. Brems, “Face veil bans in the European Court of Human Rights: the importance of empirical findings,” JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 517–551, 2014.
@article{4411976,
  abstract     = {{First, this Article will set out the facts and context of face veil bans in Europe and the legal challenges surrounding them. Then, the Article will explain the legal criteria that will be used by the European Court of Human Rights when deciding on this issue. Next, in its central argument, this Article will discuss the possible outcome of S.A.S. v. France, by assessing whether the arguments advanced by European governments to ban face veils can pass the human rights test instituted by the court. This assessment will rely on the court’s case law, as well as on the case file of the case currently pending before it. It will also include the results of empirical research conducted among women wearing face veils in Europe and analyze whether the government’s claims are consistent with those empirical studies.}},
  author       = {{Brems, Eva}},
  editor       = {{Giller, David}},
  issn         = {{1074-0635}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY}},
  keywords     = {{ECHR,face veil ban,HRC}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{517--551}},
  title        = {{Face veil bans in the European Court of Human Rights: the importance of empirical findings}},
  url          = {{http://www.brooklaw.edu/en/intellectuallife/lawjournals/journaloflawandpolicy/generalinformation.aspx?}},
  volume       = {{22}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}