Advanced search
1 file | 697.11 KB

Direct comparison of conventional radiography and cone beam computed tomography in trauma of small bones and joints

Author
Organization

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 697.11 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
De Smet, E, G De Praeter, Koenraad Verstraete, and Filip Vanhoenacker. 2014. “Direct Comparison of Conventional Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Trauma of Small Bones and Joints.” In Orthopaedica Belgica, Abstract Book, 76–76.
APA
De Smet, E, De Praeter, G., Verstraete, K., & Vanhoenacker, F. (2014). Direct comparison of conventional radiography and cone beam computed tomography in trauma of small bones and joints. Orthopaedica Belgica, Abstract book (pp. 76–76). Presented at the Orthopaedica Belgica 2014.
Vancouver
1.
De Smet E, De Praeter G, Verstraete K, Vanhoenacker F. Direct comparison of conventional radiography and cone beam computed tomography in trauma of small bones and joints. Orthopaedica Belgica, Abstract book. 2014. p. 76–76.
MLA
De Smet, E, G De Praeter, Koenraad Verstraete, et al. “Direct Comparison of Conventional Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Trauma of Small Bones and Joints.” Orthopaedica Belgica, Abstract Book. 2014. 76–76. Print.
@inproceedings{4410770,
  articleno    = {abstract O3},
  author       = {De Smet, E and De Praeter, G and Verstraete, Koenraad and Vanhoenacker, Filip},
  booktitle    = {Orthopaedica Belgica, Abstract book},
  language     = {eng},
  location     = {Antwerp, Belgium},
  pages        = {abstract O3:76--abstract O3:76},
  title        = {Direct comparison of conventional radiography and cone beam computed tomography in trauma of small bones and joints},
  year         = {2014},
}