Advanced search
1 file | 237.59 KB Add to list

'There are no men here, so why should I be a woman?' Franse en Angelsaksische verpleegsters in hun omgang met gewonde soldaten en lichamelijkheid tijdens de Eerste Wereldoorlog

Author
Organization
Abstract
In this article the cultural reaction of French and Anglo-Saxon voluntary nurses to the impact of the First World War on the soldier’s body is analyzed by means of a discourse analysis of their (wartime) writings. It enriches the historiography that successfully corrects and deconstructs the traditional view of the Great War as a male-only, trench-fighter’s war. The descriptions and meanings given to the bodies are related to the identities of the authors. Both French and Anglo-Saxon nurses use two seemingly contradictory discourses. On the one hand they reveal the horrors of war by describing the bodies as maimed. On the other hand they idealize and masculinize the wounded body; it is represented as the site through which masculine identity is performed and thus constructed. The flip side of this representation is that the nurses appropriate an eternal femininity. This general tendency contrasts with the exceptional writings of three nurses: Enid Bagnold, Ellen La Motte, and Mary Borden, who deliver potent critiques of war and war nursing and contest the gendered war ideology by questioning (or even negating) ‘the male body’ and conventional notions of masculinity and femininity.
Keywords
First World War, gender

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 237.59 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Van Wesemael, Fabian. “‘There Are No Men Here, so Why Should I Be a Woman?’ Franse En Angelsaksische Verpleegsters in Hun Omgang Met Gewonde Soldaten En Lichamelijkheid Tijdens De Eerste Wereldoorlog.” TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR GENDERSTUDIES 17.1 (2014): 27–45. Print.
APA
Van Wesemael, F. (2014). “There are no men here, so why should I be a woman?” Franse en Angelsaksische verpleegsters in hun omgang met gewonde soldaten en lichamelijkheid tijdens de Eerste Wereldoorlog. TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR GENDERSTUDIES, 17(1), 27–45.
Chicago author-date
Van Wesemael, Fabian. 2014. “‘There Are No Men Here, so Why Should I Be a Woman?’ Franse En Angelsaksische Verpleegsters in Hun Omgang Met Gewonde Soldaten En Lichamelijkheid Tijdens De Eerste Wereldoorlog.” Tijdschrift Voor Genderstudies 17 (1): 27–45.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Van Wesemael, Fabian. 2014. “‘There Are No Men Here, so Why Should I Be a Woman?’ Franse En Angelsaksische Verpleegsters in Hun Omgang Met Gewonde Soldaten En Lichamelijkheid Tijdens De Eerste Wereldoorlog.” Tijdschrift Voor Genderstudies 17 (1): 27–45.
Vancouver
1.
Van Wesemael F. “There are no men here, so why should I be a woman?” Franse en Angelsaksische verpleegsters in hun omgang met gewonde soldaten en lichamelijkheid tijdens de Eerste Wereldoorlog. TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR GENDERSTUDIES. 2014;17(1):27–45.
IEEE
[1]
F. Van Wesemael, “‘There are no men here, so why should I be a woman?’ Franse en Angelsaksische verpleegsters in hun omgang met gewonde soldaten en lichamelijkheid tijdens de Eerste Wereldoorlog,” TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR GENDERSTUDIES, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 27–45, 2014.
@article{4390045,
  abstract     = {In this article the cultural reaction of French and Anglo-Saxon voluntary nurses to the impact of the First World War on the soldier’s body is analyzed by means of a discourse analysis of their (wartime) writings. It enriches the historiography that successfully corrects and deconstructs the traditional view of the Great War as a male-only, trench-fighter’s war. The descriptions and meanings given to the bodies are related to the identities of the authors. Both French and Anglo-Saxon nurses use two seemingly contradictory discourses. On the one hand they reveal the horrors of war by describing the bodies as maimed. On the other hand they idealize and masculinize the wounded body; it is represented as the site through which masculine identity is performed and thus constructed. The flip side of this representation is that the nurses appropriate an eternal femininity. This general tendency contrasts with the exceptional writings of three nurses: Enid Bagnold, Ellen La Motte, and Mary Borden, who deliver potent critiques of war and war nursing and contest the gendered war ideology by questioning (or even negating) ‘the male body’ and conventional notions of masculinity and femininity.},
  author       = {Van Wesemael, Fabian},
  issn         = {1388-3186},
  journal      = {TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR GENDERSTUDIES},
  keywords     = {First World War,gender},
  language     = {dut},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {27--45},
  title        = {'There are no men here, so why should I be a woman?' Franse en Angelsaksische verpleegsters in hun omgang met gewonde soldaten en lichamelijkheid tijdens de Eerste Wereldoorlog},
  volume       = {17},
  year         = {2014},
}