Advanced search
1 file | 351.69 KB

Classement par ordre d'importance des zoonoses alimentaires: méthodologie et application à la situation belge

Author
Organization
Abstract
A semi-quantitative methodology was developed to rank an extended list of foodborne zoonoses. Scores were given by 35 scientific experts in a standardised manner to 51 zoonotic agents based on five criteria related to public health (severity and occurrence in humans), impact on animal health (severity of disease coupled with economic consequences and occurrence in animals) and food (occurrence in food). Independently, the relative importance of the five criteria was weighted by 7 food chain risk managers. The zoonotic agents were ranked based on overall weighted scores and were grouped in four statistically different levels of importance. The following foodborne zoonotic pathogens were classified as "most important" : Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes and verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC). These results support the establishment of the annual monitoring programme. They also make it possible to identify knowledge gaps and to formulate key research questions.
Keywords
Methodology, Standardised expert scores, Prioritization, Foodborne zoonoses, Criteria, SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT, FOOD, SURVEILLANCE, INFECTIONS, SYSTEMS, DISEASE, EUROPE, CALVES, MEAT

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 351.69 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Cardoen, Sabine, Xavier Van Huffel, Dirk Berkvens, Sophie Quoilin, Geneviève Ducoffre, Claude Saegerman, Niko Speybroeck, et al. 2009. “Classement Par Ordre D’importance Des Zoonoses Alimentaires: Méthodologie Et Application à La Situation Belge.” In Revue Epidemiologie Et Sante Animale, ed. B Toma, 55:27–44. Maisons-Alfort, France: Association de l’étude de l'épidémiologie des maladies animales (AEEMA).
APA
Cardoen, Sabine, Van Huffel, X., Berkvens, D., Quoilin, S., Ducoffre, G., Saegerman, C., Speybroeck, N., et al. (2009). Classement par ordre d’importance des zoonoses alimentaires: méthodologie et application à la situation belge. In B. Toma (Ed.), Revue Epidemiologie et Sante Animale (Vol. 55, pp. 27–44). Presented at the Conference on Sentinel Animal Epidemiology, Maisons-Alfort, France: Association de l’étude de l'épidémiologie des maladies animales (AEEMA).
Vancouver
1.
Cardoen S, Van Huffel X, Berkvens D, Quoilin S, Ducoffre G, Saegerman C, et al. Classement par ordre d’importance des zoonoses alimentaires: méthodologie et application à la situation belge. In: Toma B, editor. Revue Epidemiologie et Sante Animale. Maisons-Alfort, France: Association de l’étude de l'épidémiologie des maladies animales (AEEMA); 2009. p. 27–44.
MLA
Cardoen, Sabine, Xavier Van Huffel, Dirk Berkvens, et al. “Classement Par Ordre D’importance Des Zoonoses Alimentaires: Méthodologie Et Application à La Situation Belge.” Revue Epidemiologie Et Sante Animale. Ed. B Toma. Vol. 55. Maisons-Alfort, France: Association de l’étude de l'épidémiologie des maladies animales (AEEMA), 2009. 27–44. Print.
@inproceedings{4388577,
  abstract     = {A semi-quantitative methodology was developed to rank an extended list of foodborne zoonoses. Scores were given by 35 scientific experts in a standardised manner to 51 zoonotic agents based on five criteria related to public health (severity and occurrence in humans), impact on animal health (severity of disease coupled with economic consequences and occurrence in animals) and food (occurrence in food). Independently, the relative importance of the five criteria was weighted by 7 food chain risk managers. The zoonotic agents were ranked based on overall weighted scores and were grouped in four statistically different levels of importance. The following foodborne zoonotic pathogens were classified as {\textacutedbl}most important{\textacutedbl} : Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes and verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC). These results support the establishment of the annual monitoring programme. They also make it possible to identify knowledge gaps and to formulate key research questions.},
  author       = {Cardoen, Sabine and Van Huffel, Xavier and Berkvens, Dirk and Quoilin, Sophie and Ducoffre, Genevi{\`e}ve and Saegerman, Claude and Speybroeck, Niko and Imberechts, Hein and Herman, Lieve and Ducatelle, Richard and Dierick, Katelijne},
  booktitle    = {Revue Epidemiologie et Sante Animale},
  editor       = {Toma, B},
  issn         = {0754-2186},
  keyword      = {Methodology,Standardised expert scores,Prioritization,Foodborne zoonoses,Criteria,SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT,FOOD,SURVEILLANCE,INFECTIONS,SYSTEMS,DISEASE,EUROPE,CALVES,MEAT},
  language     = {fre},
  location     = {Paris, France},
  pages        = {27--44},
  publisher    = {Association de l'{\'e}tude de l'{\'e}pid{\'e}miologie des maladies animales (AEEMA)},
  title        = {Classement par ordre d'importance des zoonoses alimentaires: m{\'e}thodologie et application {\`a} la situation belge},
  volume       = {55},
  year         = {2009},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: